Off-label use generally means you are not covered by the manufacturer if something goes wrong.
According to the Luitpold website, the 4 days 7 vials dosage is “recommended”.
I’m not suggesting that using it as directed, which is indeed the loading dose which is 1 vial every 4 day’s for a total of 7 vials in 28 day’s is off label use.
After that initial loading dose use it is “as necessary”. The question is what that means…? Luitpold is not recommending, and legally can not recommend, due to no FDA approval and thus would constitute off label use, once per month shots. As a matter of fact, if you read Luitpolds literature, they don’t even mention to use it as needed/necessary after the inititial loading dose…
So, how about doing the loading dose once every 6 months for a total of 2 times per year? For example, in the case of a field hunter who is hunted hard 2 day’s per week, give the loading dose a month before hunting season starts followed by another loading dose once the season is over. That way you use it as directed. It also comes down to the same total amount of money spend over a year vs monthly shots.
The use of Adequan has been researched and proven to work when using the loading dose. Once per month injections “as needed” has not been researched, at least the research ,if it has been done in the first place, has not been published. So the question is, do the once monthly injections work?
For virtually the same amount of money on a yearly basis, you could administer the loading dose of Adequan twice per year for a total of 14 shots vs 12 monthly shots. Would this work better?