[QUOTE=Cowgirl;8932005]
These are good ideas, but I have to ask again: WHY DO IT AT ALL? It just contributes to the whole elitist impression of dressage–to create a show that only a few people can participate in and that doesn’t really reflect the quality of riding in this country because the best can’t all participate. [/QUOTE]
It no more creates that impression than the Scottsdale Arabian show creates an impression of elitist Arabian owners or the Morgan Grand National creates an impression of elitists having Morgans or the AQHA Congress suggest elitists have quarter horses.
Nobody thinks that about any of those events. They’re just big championship horse shows held every year in the same place, and some people go and some don’t. That’s life with horses. That’s how shows are. Some horse people care about championships and budget for them and make it happen. Others have other goals, and don’t bother.
“Why even have it”?
Because it’s a helluva lot of fun. There are nearly 400 pairs there. In no dictionary does FOUR HUNDRED equal “a few”. A few is defined as three or four.
And the people who’re there showing this week are not all rich, by any stretch. That’s just a ridiculous impression to draw. And plenty of them competing over there are among the best horse and rider pairs in their regions. Others qualified and took the place of higher-scored riders who didn’t go. Now they have a chance to score higher at a bigger show. That’s horses. Some of the best from every region are wealthy. Others aren’t. That’s horses.
It’s a fun thing to go do, and to experience.