Another weird dope test;

Starting this year, the FEI assumed all financial responsibility for testing at competitions. They send out a Vet and technicians to the venue to do the testing.

You can read more about this here.

This is interesting:

A change has been made to the Veterinary Regulations where testing at 3* level events and above is no longer mandatory, and there is no longer a minimum number or percentage of horses that must be sampled at each FEI event. This will allow the FEI Veterinary Department to carry out testing evenly across the disciplines and across the different levels of FEI events.

IMO, testing should be mandatory for the top four spots in both team and individual competitions in which there is either a championship or a qualification for a championship. I say four because if someone loses a podium spot to a positive drugs finding, you also want to know that your newly-promoted medalist is playing by the rules.

One potential issue here is that it looks bad to the IOC to have doping positives in your sport, especially if the ISF feels the threat of Olympic expulsion. ISFs will do just about anything to keep their sport in the Olympics. Sadly for those who want an equal playing field, the ISFs have realized that it’s easier to sweep doping under the rug (hello IAAF) and just claim it’s not happening. One way to do that is to conduct fewer tests.

In equestrian sports, the need to pretend all is swell cuts against the FEI’s mission statement on horse welfare. I hope these new policies aren’t the FEI’s way of weaseling out of a serious anti-doping protocol.

2 Likes

What’s funny peculiar about all this is that Clean Sport was Princess Haya’s personal initiative, along with transparency. Now that she’s gone, her signature programs seem to be vanishing with her. When I say “funny peculiar”, I’m referencing her husband’s racing and endurance programs that seem to have drowned in illegal drugging in the past.

If drug testing isn’t mandatory at the upper levels of sport, why bother to test at all?

PR.

1 Like

So how many drug tests have been carried out at North American events by the FEI since 2016? The FEI makes it very clear that the NFs are to keep hands completely off testing in international competition, although I suppose that the USEF would drug test at “mixed” events–and why the duplication of effort? Would there be two drug testing vets at the venue? One is paid to drug test only the CC (or CI) classes and the other to test all the other competitions from BN to Advanced?

That information can be found here: http://inside.fei.org/fei/cleansport/horses/testing-results

I find this so shocking about not testing the winners. In the 90’s I was pretty good in the arabian community and regularly won at the regional and above level. Every champion or reserve at our regionals and above came with a drug test. They always met me at the out gate followed us back to the stall and waited.

It’s shocking to me that isn’t done at the international level!

4 Likes

I only looked at 4s, and they don’t seem to have drug tested at Pau in 2016 or 2017, nor did they drug test at Adelaide in 2016 that I could see. They didi not test at Burghley or Le Lion in 2017. If they were at a 4 event, they did test the winner, as far as I can tell. This year at Badminton, they tested 3 horses and one was Nereo. They tested all the individual medal winners at the Olympics, but not all of the team winners, so far as I can figure. At Burghley in 2016, they tested Nobilis. At Le Lion last year, they tested Weisse Duene (or whatever Ingrid Klimke’s horse was named.) At the former Rolex, they tested Fischer Rocana both years. At some US competitions they only tested one, two or three horses.

They do one heck of a lot more drug testing in Show Jumping and Endurance, and they test a whole bunch of horses at each competition. Dressage is sort of in the middle.

2 Likes

COTH has updated their story. The B sample also tested positive, as did a German test on August 23rd.

1 Like

I wonder if the committees that put this program together were concerned that the concentration of testing the upper levels was spreading the testing resources too thin and that drugging at the lower levels was a big problem? It’s difficult to know what the FEI is thinking even when they try to explain their reasoning.

Obviously there is still testing as the German team referenced in the article knows all too well.

I like how some people feel the tests are too sensitive, yet if the competitor were someone else whose initials are M and L, they’d be ready to throw them out of Eventing forever. And are these the same people who say “blood is blood and none shall pass” when Bertram Allen and Scott Brash had miniscule marks on their sides?

In this case, the test didn’t have to be very sensitive - the horse got a therapeutic-level dose of Previcox between Friday afternoon dressage and Saturday XC.

speaking of blood – I’m surprised no one’s started a thread about the changes to blood rules in sj .vs eventing . . . have at it!

[URL=“https://www.horsetalk.co.nz/2017/11/05/blood-spotlight-fei-showjumping-rules/”]https://www.horsetalk.co.nz/2017/11/...jumping-rules/

“In contrast, the eventing rules up for discussion at the General Assembly appear more lenient. Amendments to the Blood on Horses rule (Art. 526.4) propose that “Blood on Horses must be reviewed case by case by the Ground Jury. Not all cases of blood will lead to elimination. In minor cases of blood in the mouth, such as where a Horse appears to have bitten its tongue or lip, or minor bleeding, after investigation in consultation with the Veterinarian, the Ground Jury may authorise the Athlete to continue. The cases indicating Abuse of Horse will be dealt with according to the provision of Art. 526.2 (Abuse of Horse – Warnings and Penalties)”.”

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Previcox one of those drugs that doesn’t have instantaneous effects–eg, there’s a loading period? So one dose? Really?

I’ve heard vets say that it takes a few days for Previcox to have a noticeable effect.

If you look at the timing of the tests
one can only guess at the motivation of anyone that would medicate with this, it being obviously against the rules.

Veterinarians, and thus members of FEI level teams, know it will test.

1 Like

But there’s a good chance - 5 to 1 - that you won’t be tested.

And that just means you give up the medal that you wouldn’t have won if you didn’t finish a team. The H&H report says there’s no penalty except a fine and that there is no ban on competition.

The fine is about $3300. Not-winning a medal for a team whose funding depends on results can be far more expensive than that.

:slight_smile:

5 Likes

No. It’s more like bute. One dose would have a bit of therapeutic effect. I personally don’t like zero tolerance
I think it’s dumb. (Although where you draw the line is tough). But this is not a case of trace amounts
although I would be curious if this would violate USEF drug rules. I suspect this would be close. I think previcox is a 12 hour with holding.

https://heelsdownmag.com/?p=11812

I’m not sure assuming sabotage is really the best approach. Thoughts?

I wonder if it is possible that the groom thought they were giving something like UlcerGard, but accidentally administered Equioxx paste? The tubes look very similar

I was also wondering if they could have administered a “Natural” joint/ache supplement that could somehow test positive for firocoxib (ie Jock Paget’s natural supplement testing positive for Reserpine at Burghley). That probably makes less sense in this case since it was a therapeutic dose of firocoxib.

My gut feeling is that it was accidental, not sabotage, but we may never really know

1 Like

No way any previcox should have made it into tack trunks etc at the European Championships. Everyone I know with FEI horses is beyond careful

2 Likes