Can’t compare to years past as I was a Congress Virgin until a week ago.
But here’s what I saw worth noting:
The “problem” with bling as observed from the stands. Not that so many gosh dang crystals are on top, the silver on the $5+ K does nothing. Sad to say, but if you commit to bling on top, you need to catch up with your saddle.
It was mainly men and a few heavy women in the Select division who went “back to basics” with matte colors. But the plain shirt is nice. And the Horse Show Diva booth had these lazy/jewelled shells that you could zip on over your plain shirt. Those looked nice on riders and certainly would give you the option of changing up your outfit more often for less money.
The brims on hats are all “straight edge”-- no curve to the wings The brim come straight out in front and then makes a sharp turn to curve up on the sides. It looks good-- crispy clean-- but very Warner Brothers cartoon, too.
Not a fan of the “salamander under a rock/albino” light saddles. There’s Blue Ribbon untanned/london color and then there’s the extreme done by Harris saddles. I don’t understand how you take care of an uberlight Harris saddle. I agree that these light saddles don’t help most color palettes. The black saddles were cool and those made me jones for some chocolate saddles used by riders who would choose warm tones for their ensemble.
Oh, and individual competitors buying ad space for themselves in the Equine Chronicle. What? Has this always gone on? It seems a bizarre use of money.