Barisone/Kanarek Legal Filings (Public Record)

[TheJenners]

@Sparky , it’s still there, you must have been blocked.

[Sparky]

@TheJenners

@Sparky , it’s still there, you must have been blocked.

👍🏻😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[smoofox]

@eggbutt

GUESS WHAT I FOUND!!! The incriminating statement I made about being the bed of MB’s truck!!! I will post the post I was responding to as well for reference. Seems La-La is scraping the barrel trying to make fact out of sarcasm!!

[I]"10. 20, 2019, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by smoofox View Post
That is a very interesting change in your approach to this thread… when nothing you have posted previously was even remotely considered to be dangerous to the continuation of the thread… so what was so different about that last post?

Many pages ago you spewed a lot of details we had not heard before and then to cover for that brain fart insisted it was all in the thread further back… when that was not 100% correct. As Jealoushe and others (including me) have opined, you appear to be far closer to this incident than you are admitting - and have been very disingenuous about that.

If I were to tell you I was in the back of MB’s dually when he raced up to the house to have a shoot-out, would that make you happy or change anything? Nope, it wouldn’t. My identity is of no concern whatsoever nor is whether I was there or not. How is that “disingenuous”? :eek:[/I]

And please refresh my memory…what exactly is “the actual discussion”? Sacrifice paddocks? :lol:"

Seriously? THAT was the incriminating evidence/post? That was a reply to me and I did not for one nanosecond (or a fraction thereof) believe it was anything other than snide sarcasm. If THAT is now being presented as The Truth… just wow. Mountains out of …less than molehills.

In other news… I wish I had Netflix.

[eggbutt]

@smoofox

Seriously? THAT was the incriminating evidence/post? That was a reply to me and I did not for one nanosecond (or a fraction thereof) believe it was anything other than snide sarcasm. If THAT is now being presented as The Truth… just wow. Mountains out of …less than molehills.

In other news… I wish I had Netflix.

Yes, and we wonder why she didn’t provide the offending post when I called her on it and she said she didn’t have time to look it up. Then she accused me of gaslighting. It was a nothing burger. Her credibility definitely isn’t something to put trust in, is it?

[cheval_convert]

@eggbutt

Elvis has NOT left the building!

Having seen the movie, “Bubbahotep” I can attest that this is true!

[YankeeDuchess]

  The signed and dated order denying Lauren’s motion to appoint a fiscal administrator preventing Barisone from selling horses appeared on the NJ court site today, March 27. 

   It is dated today, March 27. 

   Somehow Knights Mom claims to have seen a signed and dated judge’s order on the motion two days ago.

[Smthn_Like_Olivia]

@YankeeDuchess

The signed and dated order denying Lauren’s motion to appoint a fiscal administrator preventing Barisone from selling horses appeared on the NJ court site today, March 27.

It is dated today, March 27.

Somehow Knights Mom claims to have seen a signed and dated judge’s order on the motion two days ago.

Seriously, you’ve gotta find something better to obsess about.

[Knights_Mom]

@YankeeDuchess

The signed and dated order denying Lauren’s motion to appoint a fiscal administrator preventing Barisone from selling horses appeared on the NJ court site today, March 27.

It is dated today, March 27.

Somehow Knights Mom claims to have seen a signed and dated judge’s order on the motion two days ago.

Give it up. Now you’re just being ridiculous. OF COURSE a newly signed order would have the date it was newly signed. Is it that you can’t understand or you just don’t want to understand?

But other than that, think what you want. Maybe I’m boffing the judge. Shining his gavel. Rubbing his robe.

[angelssix]

@Smthn_Like_Olivia

Seriously, you’ve gotta find something better to obsess about.

Everyone needs to stop obsessing over Lauren Kanawreck. She is quite a piece of work. Go back to watching daytime soap operas if you have that much time on your hands…

[eggbutt]

Does anyone want to argue this now??? Sorry, but the judge’s signature didn’t come through. And so I am not accused of not capturing something relevant, I copied everything on the page and it is posted here without edit.

01013 Christopher L. Deininger, Esq., N.J. Bar ID No. 004271996 DEININGER & ASSOCIATES, LLP 415 Route 10, Suite 1 Randolph, New Jersey 07869 (973) 879-1610; Fax (973) 361-1241 Attorneys for Defendant Michael Barisone LAUREN KANAREK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BARISONE; SWEETGRASS FARMS, LLC; RUTH COX; JOHN DOES 1-30; ABC CORPORATIONS 1- 20, Defendants, : : : : : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MORRIS COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MRS-L-2250-19 ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought to the Court by Order to Show Cause application made by the plaintiff, LAUREN KANAREK (“Plaintiff”), on notice to all parties, seeking preliminary relief in the form of (a) an Order appointing a special financial agent to ensure that the assets of defendant MICHAEL BARISONE (“Barisone”) are not dissipated pending the outcome of this litigation, (b) enjoining Barisone from transferring assets absent permission from the courtappointed special fiscal agent, and © granting such other relief as may be deemed equitable and just (the “Application”); and papers in opposition having been filed on behalf of Barisone; and the Court having held oral argument on March 20, 2020; and the Court having considered the papers submitting both in support and opposition to the application, as well as the oral arguments of counsel; and, for good cause shown, IT IS on this 27 day of March, 2020, ORDERED the Application shall be and hereby is denied, without prejudice, for the reasons stated by this Court on the record; and it is further ORDERED that a true and correct copy of this Order shall be served upon all counsel of record within 7 days. ________________________________ WILLIAM J. McGOVERN III, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

[Denali6298]

@Knights Mom

Give it up. Now you’re just being ridiculous. OF COURSE a newly signed order would have the date it was newly signed. Is it that you can’t understand or you just don’t want to understand?

But other than that, think what you want. Maybe I’m boffing the judge. Shining his gavel. Rubbing his robe.

For your sake stop trying to make this poster understand. She did the same thing in the safe sport threads. Unending what ifs.

[Smthn_Like_Olivia]

Do people still watch daytime soap operas??

[Ambitious_Kate]

@Knights Mom

Give it up. Now you’re just being ridiculous. OF COURSE a newly signed order would have the date it was newly signed. Is it that you can’t understand or you just don’t want to understand?

But other than that, think what you want. Maybe I’m boffing the judge. Shining his gavel. Rubbing his robe.

Of course she understands it. She’s being purposefully obtuse.

So, Knights Mom, I have a question. If Kanarek, of course, and also Barisone, and Sweet Water farms, and now Cox Also are bringing a counter suit on Kanarek and all are demanding a jury (of 6) trial, do they get four different juries, or do they get one jury, and hear all the complaints, one after the other? Or each seperately?

I’d love to know how this circus of monkeys works.

[Denali6298]

@YankeeDuchess people would take you seriously if you engaged more in our community. I, to be honest, suspect you’re an alter for some one who posts only in off topic. Try to become apart of this community.

[eggbutt]

@Knights Mom

Give it up. Now you’re just being ridiculous. OF COURSE a newly signed order would have the date it was newly signed. Is it that you can’t understand or you just don’t want to understand?

But other than that, think what you want. Maybe I’m boffing the judge. Shining his gavel. Rubbing his robe.

Perhaps those of us who saw it days ago are actually clairvoyant!! :tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink:

[eggbutt]

@La-LaPopRider

This is a really good point. I posted it too, only having read Eggbutts account of what she believes to be “FACTS.” (Post #2 of hers. ) I, myself, have seen no actual evidence from my own attorneys that motion (b) was denied.

The very first element of her partial posting of pieces of this document I pointed out to her- was the fact she removed the date of the proceeding. Additionally, whatever the ruling - there is a reason for the “without prejudice,” add-on.

Of course, by now, it’s really not so shocking Eggbutt (whom identified herself by referencing a comment I made to her on FB) would open yet another thread, again, twisting words used in “answer,” to my complaint, and calling them “facts.” She is known for doing the same thing to others -with her small group of lackeys, (IRL) in NC. Arguing with her is pointless. Her agenda is clear. Anytime she is called out- she pivots to “recipes.” Therefore, her interest is not in this case- rather, her interest is far more along the lines of proving her undying loyalty to her “very good friends,” - which she has named as being “MH’s family & MH “- since she has “known MH since she was a teen.” Disclaimer- That does not make her the “friend,” she believes to be she is. Though, I suppose, as long as SHE believes it… she can be as much a lackey for MH as R.C was for both MH & MB- by providing the gun used to (attempt) to murder us.

Lastly, she must have forgotten her post claiming she may have been “hiding,” in MB’s dually at the time of the shooting. That’s a bold claim. Random, I know. But thought I’d remind her 5 (ish) “comment boosters,” we are keeping very close track of her rantings- for obvious legal reasons, during an ongoing criminal investigation.

I wonder if LK’s attorneys have notified her yet???

I wonder if anyone has notified LK I posted the sarcastic post mentioning hiding in MB’s dually? And, let me ask again, what “obvious legal reasons”???

I wonder if anyone actually believes much of what LK rants or imagines??? Delusional.

[Knights_Mom]

@Ambitious Kate

Of course she understands it. She’s being purposefully obtuse.

So, Knights Mom, I have a question. If Kanarek, of course, and also Barisone, and Sweet Water farms, and now Cox Also are bringing a counter suit on Kanarek and all are demanding a jury (of 6) trial, do they get four different juries, or do they get one jury, and hear all the complaints, one after the other? Or each seperately?

I’d love to know how this circus of monkeys works.

There is one trial with one jury.

[eggbutt]

@Knights Mom

There is one trial with one jury.

And all different attorneys present their party’s evidence? Seems that it would get confusing if it isn’t controlled somehow. Interesting.

[YankeeDuchess]

@Denali6298

@YankeeDuchess people would take you seriously if you engaged more in our community. I, to be honest, suspect you’re an alter for some one who posts only in off topic. Try to become apart of this community.

Thanks for the advice, Denali.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@eggbutt

And all different attorneys present their party’s evidence? Seems that it would get confusing if it isn’t controlled somehow. Interesting.

I would bet that the judge will go to great lengths to keep control of that proceeding, and put some pretty strict rules down keeping people on task.