They probably do, but they can’t provide that to the jury. It’s not entered into evidence. The jury has to hear what the witness testified to.
12 Likes
Sounds like they are considering the insanity defense?
6 Likes
Hell, just let the rewatch the YouTubes….
3 Likes
I think they all gave dates by the time they were done. I think one of them had to correct the dates in his notes or something like that. I have a vague recollection of it.
And in fact, if I look at my piece of paper, I think I actually wrote down the dates. Which the jury could have done if they had been allowed to take notes!
9 Likes
I’m curious about the mechanics of this. The defense isn’t active in finding the info. Is it up to the prosecution? Also, is there a transcript? Seems like it should have a search function with a date stamp.
2 Likes
According to the judge’s instructions, the jury does not need to entertain the issue of insanity until they’ve determined that the prosecution met its burden on the elements of its case.
4 Likes
There were no specific dates given. Pistachio said it was approximately a year after the event and the first defense expert ( psychiatrist) said about 1 month.
2 Likes
That’s what I was thinking lol
I thought maybe it would be in some of the written documents that are part of the evidence but I’ve not followed closely enough to know all of the entered evidence.
1 Like
Very good point especially considering all the information the judge let witnesses refresh their memory from but did not allow to be entered into evidence. Hmmm
3 Likes
If the criminal case ends with conviction, there is no appeal.
1 Like
It’s up to the court to identify and read back the requested testimony.
Transcripts actually take some time. Even with transcription software, the transcript has to be proofread and verified for accuracy before becoming official.
13 Likes
It seems to be on a par with all the other procedural work in this case. 
7 Likes
I just did a quick check of the YT transcript for the psychiatrist and he says the first time he saw MB was Sept 9, 2019 so that is in evidence. Hopefully the other dates are too
6 Likes
In regards to SafeSport, the Code clearly states that an adjudication of not guilty is not included in the bar on criminal charges. Active criminal charges are. If found not guilty, the respondent is not in violation of SafeSport code.
a. Criminal Disposition
It is a violation of the Code for a Participant to be
or have been subject to any disposition or
resolution of a criminal proceeding, other than an
adjudication of not guilty, including, but not
limited to: an adjudication of guilt or admission
to a criminal violation, a plea to the charge or a
lesser included offense, a plea of no contest, any
plea analogous to an Alford or Kennedy plea, the
disposition of the proceeding through a
diversionary program, deferred adjudication,
deferred prosecution, disposition of supervision,
conditional dismissal, juvenile delinquency
adjudication, or similar arrangement.b. Criminal Charge, including Warrant for Arrest
It is a violation of the Code for a Participant to
have any pending criminal charge(s) or
warrant(s) for arrest.
Further, there is specific language about the right to a new initial decision, not arbitration, in the case that an individual is found not guilty:
If the Center renders a Decision regarding a
Participant’s Criminal Charge or Disposition, and
that Charge or Disposition is subsequently modified
by a criminal court, the Participant may request that
the matter be reopened by the Center, pursuant to
Section XI®. In instances where a pending criminal
charge(s) resolves, in that the charge(s) is eventually
dismissed, results in an acquittal, or results in a
Criminal Disposition as defined above, a
Respondent’s request to reopen will always be
granted and a new Decision issued.
8 Likes
People on this thread are heavily influenced by people holding past grudges and a loyal fan base.
7 Likes
LKs conduct wasn’t just a matter of SM trash talking.
She was staying at his farm, and on the physical property with her boyfriend and horses, after being asked to leave it.
There are allegations that LK stood outside the door of the actual apartment MB shared with MHG and the children, screaming that she (LK) was going to ruin him.
MB and MHG were driven from their physical home to go stay in the barn, because of LKs conduct. MHGs children were sent away to stay with their father.
There were illegal recording devices placed in various sports on MBs farm. and his private conversations with other friends and clients were recorded… and publicized.
One good client, Mary DiFranco, testified she was going to pull multiple horses from MBs program, and her daughter was going to leave her role as a working student for MB, entirely because of the escalating issues with LK.
The BI and FM were called out, in a malicious attempt to get MB fined and penalized. The working students, MB, MHG, and JH we’re all driven from ANOTHER place they were temporarily sleeping.
And last, but not least, there is the SafeSport complaint, that resulted in a visit from DCPP, and interviews with MHG regarding her children’s welfare. Which is absolutely awful thing for any parent to go through, when the complaint is lacking in foundation.
And don’t even try the whole “it was tot for tat.”
Was LK driven from a home she actually owned, because someone was screaming outside her door nightly? No.
Was she facing thousands of dollars in fines on property she owned because someone had called a BI or FM and given them a heads up in a malicious attempt to harm her? No.
Did LK have a business that was being damaged because clients and employees were being driven away by an escalating situation involving harassing behavior? No.
Did LK have children that literally had to leave her custody and go stay somewhere else safe because of escalating harassment? No.
Did LK have to sit down with a DCPP investigator and address a complaint related to her children potentially being involved in a neglect/abuse situation? No.
To minimize this whole situation and say it was just about social media $hit posting on LKs part? And that the harassment was somehow an equivalent tit for tat? That’s deeply disingenuous.
LK did get shot. That was awful. It shouldn’t have happened. The behavior prior to her being shot? It was also awful. And she bears the vast majority of responsibility for that awful behavior. That’s the truth. Horse pros are often imperfect people. I’m sure MB has his issues. But LK was a CLIENT. The solution to problems with a horse pro when you are a client is to just take your $$$$ and animals elsewhere. That’s it. It’s not complicated.
45 Likes
Me too. Just trying to look through my own notes us a challenge and no one is relying on those for a verdict.
14 Likes
