<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by drifting cloud:
I STRONGLY disagree. How can you say this just because he ran 3rd to two other very good horses in a Grade 1 race???
His wins in the Derby and Preakness showed exactly how much class he has, and he will show his class in future races. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Did he win the Triple Crown? Nope. He isn’t in the same field. Not saying he isn’t an incredible horse, but he isn’t AS incredible as the Triple Crown winners. Call it era or time frame all you want, the races are the same, the level of greatness and difficulty is the same.
Funny Cide might remind Secretariat’s owner of big red, but Funny Cide is NO Secretariat. I think you’re nuts if you disagree.
Regarding what someone else said, (I think it was dressager)…none of the Triple Crown races are “sprint” races, though they are shorter than the Belmont. Just wanted to point that out 
As for sending Funny Cide early: With some horses, that’s their style of running. I don’t know about Funny Cide, but in some instances, if a horse is passed, they sulk and stop. Better to keep them up front. Sometimes if you try to hold them, they fight it (which is, if I’m not mistaken, along the line of what happened with Funny Cide). There are many reasons.
It’s hard to sit there and analyze the race and the way it was run without being an expert and avid follower, not just someone who started following the sport a few months ago. The trainers know the horses better than anyone, they’re the ones who give the instructions, and what Santos did seemed to make sense.
I think the race played out to what each horse deserved, and I don’t think Funny Cide was deprived of anything. No bob at the gate, clean break, smooth trip, fair finish. On Belmont day, Empire Maker was just the better horse.
J
Licensed Fjord Jockey and collector of bobbleheads.