[QUOTE=Laurierace;6480002]
You know you are having a bad day when you misspell the word no. [/QUOTE]
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
[QUOTE=arabhorse2]
Has anyone else noticed that every time she posts, the number of horses she’s supposedly ‘rescued’ goes up exponentially?
First it was, "I HAZ SAVED 200 HAWRSES. Now it’s, “I HAZ SAVED THOUSUNDS UV HAWRSES!” What’s next? “I PERSUNALY HAZ SAVED ELEVENTY BAJILLION HAWRSES!”
This is where I was almost rolling on the floor laughing so hard!!!
[QUOTE=JanM]I agree with Go Fish-how does a vet slam the horse’s feet down? It must be Paul Bunyan or the Incredible Hulk, who pick the horse up and toss them up in the air, and their hooves slammed when they landed. Spell Check is one of the best things ever invented, and someone needs to use it.
HAHAHAHAHA Paul Bunyan!!!
[QUOTE=Laurierace]I am not going to go back and search for the post but I believe she said she was invited to be on the Canadian Equitation team, no? They were inventing an event especially for her.
This is the funniest thread I have seen in such a long time!!!
[QUOTE=Laurierace;6479687]
I am not going to go back and search for the post but I believe she said she was invited to be on the Canadian Equitation team, no? They were inventing an event especially for her.[/QUOTE]
Someone posting about how she’s full-of-soup about the Olympics is the entire reason I’ve read all 7 pages of this thread. If you find it, you must repost!
NVM, I just saw it on page 7.
Lawlz
Has anyone ever bought a horse that was taller than advertised? I’ve never seen a thread on coth complaining about that.
Everytime I’ve ever gone horse shopping, all the 16 and 16.2 horses were at least a hand shorter than advertised. I thought everyone knew that. It’s one of the first things we all learned about horses when we were kids. (As well as that all the 7 yoa horses are actually 18-20 yoa.)
She’s invented a lot of things, so why not invent her own Olympic equitation event?:lol:
[QUOTE=jonesy;6479996]
copied from another thread about the Canadian Equestrian Team
Join Date: Nov. 29, 2009
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 66
Quote
I showed from five years old until eighteen every weekend. All Medals,hunters,jumpers,jrs. Canada asled me to ride on their equestion team. I said know. 1. I ddint want to ride for another country. 2. I was simply worn out. I got married and had a family. [/B[/QUOTE]
It was the “equestion team”,perhaps an equine themed sort of jeopardy… 
“asled”? Perhaps it was a team of mushers.
Well she was only asled, so not confirmed, and yes it was some sort of equestrian jeopardy, that’s what she said know;)
This is by far the funniest thing I’ve read in awhile :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It’s just too bad you are using Google translator to write. You may have not been an English major, but as an English professor, I can say that you wouldn’t have even gotten into English/Writing 101, and, therefore, you probably weren’t a “any” major. If you wish to have the respect of people on the internet who read your written word, make sure it is intelligible. Use complete sentences. Don’t put apostrophes where they don’t belong.
Finally, take responsibility for your actions. There is clear evidence that you have been involved in lawsuits, both on the end of the plaintiff and defendant. Acknowledge your mistakes, make reparations, and try to live a better life. Telling this quite educated audience on the COTH boards that we can’t read the bold-faced print is an insult. We are bound not to trust you.
What’s not funny about this thread is that this person is in charge of living and breathing animals, and apparently has a child, and yet she appears to have a very skewed view of reality and limited intelligence. While I have rolled my eyes and laughed along with most of you reading, it also makes me sad.
It must be appalling to live with someone like this.
There seems to be an unusually high degree of controversy surrounding this subject.
In a general context, these types of controversial subjects cause me to speculate about what the differences might be between those who may generally go through life attracting little or no controversy, and those who for whatever reason, appear to generate so much.
Just as some may seem to be prone to good fortune, some may also seem apparently prone to attracting a certain degree of disharmony about their affairs, and what interests me the most, are what forces may be at work that might account for this apparent difference.
There’s a tenant in some circles of psychology that suggests that what one projects of themselves onto the world, then becomes what they in turn experience the world to be.
The world is your mirror.
I often try to reflect on this tenant myself when ever I face any disharmony in my own life. On introspection, I often become aware of my own feelings of apprehensiveness for how things might go wrong, and contemplate on just what effects my own apprehensiveness might contribute to the realization of that which I may apprehend.
This is a complex subject, as it is not always easy to be open to discovering one’s own faults.
I have made acquaintances in the past, that have caused me to feel that there are individuals who do not seem to desire to seek any improvement in their own experiences upon this earth through any process of contemplation of the self.
It has become my belief that certain individuals may not have the capacity for, or the desire to, reinvent themselves in response to the causes of their dissatisfactions.
You may also know of individuals who seem to endlessly repeat attempts at resolving the same issue using the same solution apparently unaware that the outcome is always the same.
I can see this in myself at times, and to try to create a change in something that is so deeply ingrained for so long can seem like an impossible challenge. It is so much easier to just do what one has always done, and can fully expect the same outcome from it.
How many of us have become experts at damage control to enable our own weaknesses to perpetuate.
But when the roots of those weaknesses developed as tools that we may have at one time created to help us survive, it is understandable that we might cling to that which did function once in our lives as a mechanism of self preservation.
As we grow, and our circumstances change, we must try to become aware of the structures that we had once built for good purpose deep within our psyches, and just realize that we no longer need them. We must learn to trust in ourselves that we have the ability to create change, and accept that the process of change may at times be difficult, perhaps even seeming more difficult then that which we are attempting to move away from.
But those who never seek change may never find change of their own making.
I think change can be a gradual process, if we only commit to making one small step, and remaining vigilant to becoming aware of regressing backwards, forgiving if we do regress, but asserting to ourselves that we must keep trying.
I believe that in life. when you try hard to change for the good, that the good in the world will come to assist you in making that change.
You only need to remain aware of what you are seeking, and I think you will recognize whatever it is you need to help you find your way when it presents itself to you.
But what you do which creates chaos, may only bring you chaos.
It is unwise to burn the entire forest to gain one moment of warmth on a cold night.
The earth may provide you with all that you need in your life, if you will allow the earth to exist and prosper while accepting yourself as a part of the earth, and not trying to be the master of it.
We are all a part of the same world.
Wow…will print and keep when I get back to my "real"cmputer. Thank you!
[QUOTE=Churchill Hunt Club;6476961]
Thank you for being sincerel.[/QUOTE]
You’re not even trying. What does this word “sincerel” mean? I’ve decided it means “sincerity with evil intent”.
[QUOTE=alterhorse;6480546]
There seems to be an unusually high degree of controversy surrounding this subject.
In a general context, these types of controversial subjects cause me to speculate about what the differences might be between those who may generally go through life attracting little or no controversy, and those who for whatever reason, appear to generate so much.
Just as some may seem to be prone to good fortune, some may also seem apparently prone to attracting a certain degree of disharmony about their affairs, and what interests me the most, are what forces may be at work that might account for this apparent difference.
There’s a tenant in some circles of psychology that suggests that what one projects of themselves onto the world, then becomes what they in turn experience the world to be.
The world is your mirror.
I often try to reflect on this tenant myself when ever I face any disharmony in my own life. On introspection, I often become aware of my own feelings of apprehensiveness for how things might go wrong, and contemplate on just what effects my own apprehensiveness might contribute to the realization of that which I may apprehend.
This is a complex subject, as it is not always easy to be open to discovering one’s own faults.
I have made acquaintances in the past, that have caused me to feel that there are individuals who do not seem to desire to seek any improvement in their own experiences upon this earth through any process of contemplation of the self.
It has become my belief that certain individuals may not have the capacity for, or the desire to, reinvent themselves in response to the causes of their dissatisfactions.
You may also know of individuals who seem to endlessly repeat attempts at resolving the same issue using the same solution apparently unaware that the outcome is always the same.
I can see this in myself at times, and to try to create a change in something that is so deeply ingrained for so long can seem like an impossible challenge. It is so much easier to just do what one has always done, and can fully expect the same outcome from it.
How many of us have become experts at damage control to enable our own weaknesses to perpetuate.
But when the roots of those weaknesses developed as tools that we may have at one time created to help us survive, it is understandable that we might cling to that which did function once in our lives as a mechanism of self preservation.
As we grow, and our circumstances change, we must try to become aware of the structures that we had once built for good purpose deep within our psyches, and just realize that we no longer need them. We must learn to trust in ourselves that we have the ability to create change, and accept that the process of change may at times be difficult, perhaps even seeming more difficult then that which we are attempting to move away from.
But those who never seek change may never find change of their own making.
I think change can be a gradual process, if we only commit to making one small step, and remaining vigilant to becoming aware of regressing backwards, forgiving if we do regress, but asserting to ourselves that we must keep trying.
I believe that in life. when you try hard to change for the good, that the good in the world will come to assist you in making that change.
You only need to remain aware of what you are seeking, and I think you will recognize whatever it is you need to help you find your way when it presents itself to you.
But what you do which creates chaos, may only bring you chaos.
It is unwise to burn the entire forest to gain one moment of warmth on a cold night.
The earth may provide you with all that you need in your life, if you will allow the earth to exist and prosper while accepting yourself as a part of the earth, and not trying to be the master of it.
We are all a part of the same world.[/QUOTE]
agree mroades… this is awesome!!!
I found a quote the other day that plays to the above -
“There are some people who always seem angry looking for and creating conflict. WALK AWAY. The battle they are fighting isn’t with you, it is with themselves.”
[QUOTE=Eye in the Sky;6480784]
You’re not even trying. What does this word “sincerel” mean? I’ve decided it means “sincerity with evil intent”.[/QUOTE]
Or maybe naughty cereal? Sexy cereal? Breaking the Ten Commandments cereal?
OK folks, while we appreciate that CHC’s responses on this and other threads have been interesting, at this time, posts in response are mainly commenting on poor spelling/grammar, a point which she can’t have missed by now, so we’re going to close this thread as well.
You are welcome to reopen the topic down the road if there are new positive or negative reviews or experiences to share about this business.
Thanks,
Mod 1
