Controversial Book by Shane Sellers

This is a practice that has been adopted in some countries in the modeling industry, which like racing, is a sub-culture rife with eating disorders. The impetus was the deaths of several models who, despite a skeletal appearance and known issues, were allowed to keep working.

Eating disorders, chronic malnutrition and self-starvation, for whatever reasons, are LIFE-THREATENING. The most common cause of death is a heart attack brought on by electrolyte imbalance, after that it’s multiple organ failure brought on by chronic starvation and tissue wasting. These conditions, even if they don’t kill you, can cause permanent organ damage. Eating disorder patients also have a very high suicide rate.

Yes, you will always have people struggling to make weight. But a heck of a lot more people are going to be able to ride safely at 120-130 than at 110.

The insurance issues are also very important, as others are pointing out, especially when you take into consideration the damage these jocks are doing to themselves.

Unfortunately, like most professional sports, it’s a fear-based business. Everyone is one mishap away from the end of their career, loyalty doesn’t go far and there’s always someone waiting to take your place. The NFL has a huge problem with people playing hurt, taking mountains of painkillers, and ending up permanently disabled (like with dementia). They’re starting to deal with it but there’s such a huge stigma to sitting out a game, not everyone (especially the non-stars) wants to take that chance. Which is why, like in racing, everyone wants the other guy to be the one who takes a stand for everyone’s health and safety.

Shane Sellers is a very brave man. I admire his courage.

JER, thanks for posting… and I am very aware of what jocks go through to make weight, having ridden myself and spending LOTS of time in the jocks room…

Although raising weights will make it easier for the riders who are currently light enough to make weight now, I wonder how many 150 pound excersise boys will dangerously reduce down to 120 pounds to ride. I see it as a vicious cycle.

I commend Shane, and also Randy for sharing their story. My former brother in law started riding at 16, and was the classic example of a rider that flipped and resorted to other tactics to keep riding as he matured. I watched him suffer physically, and mentally for years. He died of throat cancer at age 40 a few years ago. I’m sure he would probably be alive today if he hadnt ruined his body by reducing all those years.

Dont get me wrong, I’m not against raising weights at all… hopefully they will come up with a plan that will work… I’m just not sure they are on the right path.

I also witnessed a rider that reduced so hard it killed him. He was an excersise boy that I personally told was to big to ride. He made the weight, rode a few races, and died of heart failure in the jocks room.

The “system” failed him. The track doctor knew he was unhealthy, as well as the stewards, yet let him keep his license. Untill everyone gets involved, and has a plan in place to deal with unhealthy jockeys, raising weights will be helpful to some of the riders, and a temptation for others.

Yes the body fat % will be the issue if a Jockey that reduces get’s his body fat % too low he will not be allowed to ride. When your body fat % gets too low, it’s a huge health concern as your organs start breaking down.

Shane also mentions in his book trying hard to get some sort of insurance benefits for jockeys and their familys. Which is something that is definatly needed. Its been too long coming.

Another issue he brings up is jockey’s signing away their rights. Yep they have to sign away their rights. Even their rights of self promotion. It’s the same thing as say NASCAR… In NASCAR you see the cars with all the different logo’s of the various company’s that sponsor them. This sponsor money is put to good use by each car’s owner as it helps with medical benefits for the drivers and pit crew.

Jockeys tried getting sponsorships from various company’s and the company logos were embroidered onto the sides and back of their Jock pants. Many tracks put a quick stop to that. Why is it that just about every other professional sport can have corporate sponsorship but not racing.

Some tracks I have ridden at wouldn’t even let you self promote. In other words have your own name on the side of your jock pants. I was riding in the Ladies Jockey Challenge up at Hoosier Park one year and had on Jock pants with my last name embroidered on the side. After riding the first race in the challenge the stewards called down and told me I had to change into pants that didn’t have my name on them.

Bless their hearts every other female jockey that was in the challenge with me said “Don’t change we’ll all put on our name pants and wear them!!!” I thanked the other lady’s and simply said “This is not the place or time, but thank you for your support.” So Shanes book covers a lot of this stuff too. He is just trying to make it better for all those jockey’s out there and the ones still to come.

Barn Brats Horse Themed Glassware
www.cmmbarnbrats.com

As for the sponsorship thing… the difference in racing is that the owner - the person footing the bills - gets no say in the sponsorship and no profit from it. If I, as an owner, am paying someone to ride my horse in a race I should have some say in what logo my horse will be sporting. And, if my horse is carrying that logo, I should get a portion of the profits from it. Plus, it just looks tacky. Same thing with self promotion. This is the argument against it, and yes, I personally feel this way, too.

I agree that insurance needs to be addressed - for everyone in the horse business.