[QUOTE=whbar158;7810818]
As someone who had a 15.1h QH with a questionable stride, but has also ridden others with no problems with strides, I still think its silly. the whole “What about the in and out” trust me unless I were to chip the first I wasn’t adding in the in and out most horses can make the in and outs fine but when the line is set at 85’ for a 6 stride the little lost every stride starts to count more and while the ponies do have the children’s pony division the Children’s horse division is still pretty competitive and you sure can’t add in it and expect to place either. You have to step all the way down to pre-child/adult and even then some judges still aren’t ok with it. Now if a judge wants to take two equal rounds and give the one who had a bigger stride and did the “number” the placing over the one who added that is ok, but no I do not think someone with a chip/missed change etc beat out someone who had a really nice round but added smoothly. Of course it is my opinion and it doesn’t matter if anyone agrees, I really enjoy the challenge of the hunters and love riding a nice relaxed round nailing all my distances and corners and it being very smooth, since that is the goal for me![/QUOTE]
I disagree that most horses could make an in and out fine versus a longer line if they don’t really have the step for either. I rode a 14h large who had a medium pony step, and it was scary trying to do an in and out set at rated pony distances. We had to run and pray and thank goodness he was scopey with no stop, but one strides in particular were hairy. We had more of a chance to make the step in a longer line where we could GALLOP, though we would typically opt for the add. I didn’t show him in the A/AA rated larges because he didn’t have the step, but when I did a local medal finals, they set the distances that way even though all of our qualifying classes were set on a 12’ step (and no combinations). That was a disappointing surprise.