[QUOTE=Palm Beach;8796996]
Same exact thing.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Texarkana;8797012]My words are failing me in my communication, because my point was completely lost.
Yes, all trainers need to have the ability to pick a spot. Most trainers are picking the best spot for the horse to win. Period. End of sentence.
In Motion’s barn, they pick the best spot for the horse… and yeah, the goal is still to win, but they’re also willing to sacrifice a win if it’s for the greater good of the horse’s career… if that makes any sense at all.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Texarkana;8799789]Shame on me for insinuating what?? And holy heck on putting words in other peoples’ mouths. How on earth would you get ANY of the topics of your rant out of my two sentences asking you to be respectful?
In case you forgot, you started this whole win percentage conversation, pointing out the shortcomings in the percentages of some, sharing your own, and asking to know that of others.[/QUOTE]
Really? Is that what happened?
I pointed out the difference in win % of a trainer based at Fair Hill with access to all those treatment modalities and one who trains at a traditional track with little access to high tech equipment like hyperbaric chambers. YOU are the one who then focused the conversation on me and insulted me. It’s easy to talk about what should and should not be done with a race horse when you don’t own or train one.
It’s difficult to run your barn the way you really want to or keep your horse the way you really want to when the money just is not there. All those treatments at Fair Hill cost money, and to get the conversation back on track, are those treatments translating to improved performance? Or as a horse owner, is it more cost effective to keep your horses in a traditional setting where they still get great care, but may not have access to a hyperbaric chamber.