Dr Gamboa has been found NOT GUILTY on all charges in Aiken County, South Carolina today as the jury took less than 1 hour to deliberate. The State’s case fell completely apart as it became clear that there was absolutely no credible admissible evidence regarding the false charges lodged against him. Ashley Hammack was the prosecutor who was the fool who prosecuted this case after learning the Dr. Gamboa passed two polygraph tests with flying colors - 1 with a plus 10 score the highest you can get for honesty and meaning absolutely no deception whatsoever.
[QUOTE=rudygirl77;7490799]
You would be wrong to assume that this charge is from the same parent as the South Carolina incident. The Mississippi charges are a completley different individual. And I know this because I am close with several people indirectly involved in this case. These new charges completely change this case. The boys in South Carolina were living in and were going to school in South Carolina. Not everyone is standing beside this man. Many are not, we are just quietly waiting for the events to unfold. And they will unfold.Remember…it is not the same child or children in the second charge!!! The mother is not even involved in the charging of accusations. Once the 1st victims verbal account of what happened was recorded, this case went straight to the State of South Carolina. That is who is charging Gamboa. The victims story has never once unwavered or differentiated from the first time they told it. There is a pattern of events here is you look closely. Predators are everywhere, in any form and most often, they are in the form mimicking the most normal and soft spoken of people. They are everyone and anyone. Stand up for victims and pray for them for the day this transgression happened to them, the soul of a child, a tiny human being was murdered. And it will never be back.[/QUOTE]
An Aiken jury found Dr. Juan Gamboa NOT GUILTY on all counts as it became clear that the children’s story did change and they were not credible. The Aiken jury took less than 1 hour to reach their verdict. Also, it has been disclosed that these are the same children in the Mississippi case. Let me know if you want there names. The name of the foolish prosecutor who went on this witch hunt was Ashley Agnew Hammack costing Aiken County citizens more that $20,000.
I know someone that knows him and she told me it was made up and that he was going to get off. Now it seems like a reality. This poor man and what he went thru just because someone says he did it. I think there has to be solid proof before something like this happens. It ruins innocent lives until they are found not guilty.
[QUOTE=TSWJB;8231690]
I know someone that knows him and she told me it was made up and that he was going to get off. Now it seems like a reality. This poor man and what he went thru just because someone says he did it. I think there has to be solid proof before something like this happens. It ruins innocent lives until they are found not guilty.[/QUOTE]
Ashley Agnew Hammack tried Dr. Juan Gamboa this week in Aiken County General Sessions. Today the jury deliberated for less than 1 hour and returned a verdict of NOT GUILTY on all false charges as her unfounded case fell apart before a packed courtroom. Numerous citizens turned out in support of Dr. Gamboa as Ashley found no one sitting behind her in support of her witch-hunt - not even the children’s mother! Ashley was made aware that Dr. Gamboa passed two polygraph test - one with a plus 10 score meaning no deception whatsoever and being the highest score one can receive. However, even armed with this information, Ashley Agnew Hammack elected to try the case costing Aiken County taxpayers over $20,000. Ashley went on another unfounded witch-hunt and would have had a better chance at finding one by looking in the mirror each morning.
Just because they could not prove the case, just because he passed a lie-detector test doesn’t mean it did not happen.
Interesting how on the off course thread you disparage a parent and name minors.
Suuuuuuuper creepy.
It took the jury less than 1 hour to find him not guilty on both counts of inappropriate touching. Never seen that before unless the defendant is absolutely innocent and have never ever before seen a defendant score a plus 10 on a lie Detector test - meaning absolutely no deception whatsoever. Before this incident the doctor only had two traffic citations in his entire life and no other criminal record. Let the man or even women who can say they have had less than two traffic citations and no other criminal charges in their entire life be the first to cast another stone at this innocent man.
[QUOTE=Aiken Citizen;8233793]
It took the jury less than 1 hour to find him not guilty on both counts of inappropriate touching. Never seed that before unless the defendant is absolutely innocent and have never ever before seen a defendant score a plus 10 on a lie Detector test - meaning absolutely no deception whatsoever. Before this incident man only had two traffic citations in his entire life and no other criminal record. Let the man or even women who can say they have had less than two traffic citations and no other criminal charges in their entire life be the first to cast another stone at this innocent man.[/QUOTE]
Mississippi =/= South Carolina…
That arrest was made after this one, is an even weaker case and is what we call in the business a copy cat allegation. The parents of both children know each other, which you wouldn’t initially think so since one incident was alleged to have happened in South Carolina and another in Mississippi. Can we all agree that when this false allegation is also dismissed in Mississippi that he is an innocent man? What is interesting in the Aiken trial is that the mother, Mellissa Berrio, was the first to report the allegations of inappropriate touching to Aiken County law enforcement by telephone from Florida which the children were staying with their father in Aiken, SC. Copies of the 911 calls she made were available and could have been played for the jury if she testified. She is what we call an outcry witness and could have testified at least regarding her initial reporting of the alleged incident. She was in Aiken this week, although she now lives in Tampa, Florida separated from her husband and they intend to get a divorce based on the father’s witness testimony. During the week she spent less than 30 minutes in the courtroom as she smiled and laughed at her second son as he testified. He did not become distraught nor upset telling his story of unlawful touching, but only became so as his story’s inconsistencies were challenged. This is not typical behavior of a child who described abuse which actually occurred, but rather that of one who is telling a “story.” Immediately after this testimony, their mother left the courtroom and hasn’t been seen since. That was last Tuesday. The jury returned its verdict Thursday afternoon after being compelled to stay in the courthouse/courtroom for four days (Monday-Thursday); whereas the mother vanished and did not care enough to stick around for their verdict. This to is not typical behavior of a mother whose children have been abused by a man. Typically they will stay in the courtroom throughout the trial, get very emotional and show signs of wanting to hurt or kill the defendant (sometimes with the jury present, but always when the jury is out).
In South Carolina corroboration is not required when an allegation of abuse is alleged by a minor under the age of 16 by an adult. All that is needed is the allegation itself. In this case Aiken County Sheriff Deputy David Blevins just took the allegations and swore out the two arrest warrants. Our local magistrate, Patrick Dorn Sullivan, is in the sheriff’s pocket as he was suspended from office over 20 months for misconduct and the sheriff testified in his behalf in order to get his job back. Magistrate Sullivan signed the two false arrest warrants which Blevins swore out. That’s all it took to start this. Blevins has recently been sued by Stephanie Kirkland after he swore out 7 false arrest warrants against her (4 lewd act and 3 criminal sexual conduct with a minor). You can look this case up on the Internet too. Blevins lost the civil suit and our county had to payout on an undisclosed settlement agreement just prior to the case being rostered for a jury trial (civil case).
