Well, this plus the other email exchange with Jennifer Yoder, plus the editorial that Leslie herself wrote, plus the facts that name changes AREN’T a simple small or inexpensive thing to try and accomplish within a matter of two months or less until the FEI event was scheduled to run AFTER sponsorships were already secured, plus the fact that John and Leslie consciously decided to ignore Boyd Martin’s late August warning that if EN continued to push the name change agenda in a highly assertive manner, they risked offending the property owner to such a degree that the lease might be canceled and the whole venue might be lost as a result…
plus, Leslie Wiley’s decision to contribute to the NYT article that was written and ran in that paper AFTER this whole controversy had already exploded on social media. The article smeared the entire eventing community and the headline clearly implied the name of the venue was racist, and ties it to the property owner… thus essentially smearing him in a NYT article.
So no… it wasn’t just that series of emails. There were a few other pieces of evidence that I considers.
What about you? What do you think of my assertion that she and others maybe should have just taken Boyd Martin’s late August warning to stop pushing this agenda so hard, gone quiet for a bit, and then regrouped after the FEI event ran, and tried privately approaching the PFEE board at that time about their thoughts and opinions with the respect to the name, and engaged respectfully and patiently?
Sorry the thread is bugging you. I am trying to do better at laying out my point of view with respect to opportunities missed to achieve a constructive outcome.
I do think USEA is a huge part of the mess as well, however, and was derelict with respect to their role in terms of managing a tricky conflict between multiple parties in such a way so that the sporting community wasn’t damaged as a result of the conflict.
What do you think I am missing?