Seriously? This series of emails convinces you that Leslie Wylie is the problem? I have got to stop reading this thread.
Well, this plus the other email exchange with Jennifer Yoder, plus the editorial that Leslie herself wrote, plus the facts that name changes ARENāT a simple small or inexpensive thing to try and accomplish within a matter of two months or less until the FEI event was scheduled to run AFTER sponsorships were already secured, plus the fact that John and Leslie consciously decided to ignore Boyd Martinās late August warning that if EN continued to push the name change agenda in a highly assertive manner, they risked offending the property owner to such a degree that the lease might be canceled and the whole venue might be lost as a resultā¦
plus, Leslie Wileyās decision to contribute to the NYT article that was written and ran in that paper AFTER this whole controversy had already exploded on social media. The article smeared the entire eventing community and the headline clearly implied the name of the venue was racist, and ties it to the property ownerā¦ thus essentially smearing him in a NYT article.
So noā¦ it wasnāt just that series of emails. There were a few other pieces of evidence that I considers.
What about you? What do you think of my assertion that she and others maybe should have just taken Boyd Martinās late August warning to stop pushing this agenda so hard, gone quiet for a bit, and then regrouped after the FEI event ran, and tried privately approaching the PFEE board at that time about their thoughts and opinions with the respect to the name, and engaged respectfully and patiently?
Sorry the thread is bugging you. I am trying to do better at laying out my point of view with respect to opportunities missed to achieve a constructive outcome.
I do think USEA is a huge part of the mess as well, however, and was derelict with respect to their role in terms of managing a tricky conflict between multiple parties in such a way so that the sporting community wasnāt damaged as a result of the conflict.
What do you think I am missing?
I deleted my post, because this thread is upsetting me and I decided I should just stay out of it. But since you replied before I deleted it and because I do appreciate the effort you are putting into the discussion, I will reply to explain my last post, but then I really am going to try to stay away going forward.
I read the emails and thought that Leslie stayed polite and professional while the other woman was the one being rude, unreasonable, and ratcheting up the political rhetoric. Yet you and others seemed to see this email exchange as more proof against EN and their evil ways. To me, only one person in this exchange looks like a jerk and itās not Leslie. So it makes me wonder if this is the way all the email exchanges went - with people being absolutely insulted by the idea that thereās any issue with inclusion in the sport because they knew a successful Black equestrian once, and then ranting against BLM.
I have wondered about the inconsistency between Leslie saying she just wanted to start a discussion about diversity and inclusion and John Thier saying he knew ending PF might be an outcome and didnāt care. And it occurred to me that starting a discussion may have been the original goal, but then along the way they got so angry or frustrated about the responses they received that they decided they didnāt care if they burned it down. Iām not saying I agree with that choice, just that I can imagine it.
I think itās tragic that the landowner pulled his support of the event, but I think itās also sad that so many people are supporting him for doing that and are putting all the blame for PF ending on one side. The landowner had a lot of options - taking his toys and going home wasnāt the only one.
I recently read the book White Fragility, which I highly recommend. It is really eye opening.
(Edited to add: I didnāt read the email exchange with Jennifer Yoder you mentioned, because I was mostly not reading the thread for a while)
@Gardenhorse - thanks for your thoughtful response. I can respect where you are coming from, and follow your train of thought when you lay it out like that.
I certainly will admit that I support the landowner and PFEE board, as is abundantly clear to anyone who has read the thread. But I do see what you are saying. And Iām sorry the thread and otherās points of view are upsetting you.
Itās a shame that everyone involved didnāt cool it, and take a time out from the discussion, until it was possible to discuss the issue in a mutually respectful, and constructive way. I think we can agree on that. Finding common ground and stuff folks on opposite sides of an issue can agree on? I think itās really important. I sense that you do care about that as well. And thatās a good thing. Yet more common ground.
Cheers to you - and hope you have a good weekend.
I donāt see where the land owner didnāt remain polite. They were beyond polite. They are not obligated to engage in any meeting of the minds or āconstructive debateā over the naming of their own property which they have generously donatedāalong with many other contributions to the sportāfor decades.
Seriously, you are not obligated to engage with these people.
There is nothing upsetting about someone not agreeing to engage in hostage negotiations with some randos about what to do with their own property.
This is not a healthy thing to be upset about.
@ladyj79 - OMG :lol::lol::lol::lol: Jan Brady!
I agree for sure - neither PFEE nor the land owner need to negotiate or talk or compromise. Definitely not. I wouldnāt.
Iām just trying to make the point in my own persistent way, that there were certainly options available for the activists to pursueā¦ such as just putting a cork into it all until AFTER the FEI event was done a little under a week ago.
As to why they didnāt just settle down? Who knows. But itās a legitimate question. And, āWe didnāt know that everyone was so upset by this and that they might shut down the venue altogether as a result.āĀ Wellā¦ thatās dishonest.
I personally thought the email exchange with Cynthia McGinnis was kinda priceless.
[I]āĀI did have a poster of Greg Best and Gem Twist on my bedroom wall when I was a kid, and I hope your family knows what sort of dreams that horse inspired ā itās really incredible, to look back. So incredible.
I want the magic of horses to be accessible to all. What can we do to help foster that?āĀ
:rolleyes:[/I]
You just canāt make something like that up. Seriously.
No, I was astonished. That was insane. It was hilarious because there is just a huge disconnect between these people and the actual world of the sport.
It reminded me of the talk a couple weeks back about jumpers needing snazzier outfits in order to attract an audience.
Just wackos who are not really a part of the sport desperately trying to not just be a part of this world, but dictate how āitās gonna beā.
crazy town.
And then being desperately offended and sad that everyone doesnt just fall to their knees thanking them for noticing that the sport exists.
This becomes more absurd by the day.
Thereās a lot more Iāve been made aware of, privately. Iām not going to go there on this thread. But itās astonishing.
I seriously am baffled at USEF and USEA engaging in any of this. They should have run interference for everyone involved in running PFEE, and kept the folks at EN from engaging directly with them with respect to this issue.
Just this evening, Ole Miss football team took a knee before the game. As did their opponent the Florida football team.
Think on that. Ole Miss took a knee, publicly, pre-game. Ole Miss.
And yet Walker-Glaccum canāt even have a conversation about the issues that knee represented in their own sport. Iām not referencing any particular decision, just a conversation. Canāt do it.
Alrighty then. Thatās where they are. End of discussion, indeed.
The changes at ole miss generated from within the players.
From within.
Honey, if I donāt know you from Adamās house cat and you bang on my door and demand that I stop offending the unknown someone with my granddaddyās innocent name for a planting, I will run you off so fast itāll make your head spin
Did not bang on your door. So you can cool off on that.
Everyone picks their flag. Your Right. Your Choice. You be You.
Tonight Iāll just go sit with Ole Miss. Yāall carry on. :yes:
you like to conflate and oversimplify things and draw connections that exist exclusively in the mind of those who are ignorant and thus who tend to conflate and oversimplify.
Your name calling is noted.
Boyd Martin has now officially asked not to be featured on EN.
Could you explain it to me then, becomes I think you are again attempting to smear people without cause.
Your unwarranted attacks are noted, as are your repeated efforts to sow discord and create controversy where none existsābased on ignorance of what words mean.
What about the morals thing you were stumping for earlier??
Arenāt I supposed to cater to your ass no matter what, since I own the land?
His exact words:
At this time, I will respectfully request that I not be part of any āEventing NationāĀ story. I will also ask that pictures or videos of me and my horses donāt appear on this website. Many thanks, Boyd.
Good for him!!! That will have some power. Hopefully some others join him. This whole mess was so irresponsible and ugly. It should never have happened the way it did, and real people were harmed by this mess.
ETA: Holy Moly! Some of the nasty comments on his Facebook calling him a privileged white make, etc etc.
Round and round it goes. Anyone who doesnāt agree with this specific activist agenda, and calls put the aggressive pressure tactics? Prepare to be smeared. Iām fine with respectfully disagreeing with others on the underlying issueā¦ but come on guysā¦ the never ending personal smears of those who disagree? Itās so bad.
No racism at the track? Uh. I doubt that. Also, BLM is a Marxist movement?