FWIW … if this horse is actually being worked into the ground for the owner’s cash gain, and this continues indefinitely, the horse will start breaking down within a few months. If this continues at the pace that is being suggested by the OP, next year this will not be the same horse. There may not be one major issue, but a string of more ordinary issues in the realm of “it’s always something”. A textbook NQR horse. At that point, it may or may not be possible to bring the horse back to full abilities with rest and proper care.
2 Likes
Half leases many places just mean the rider is guaranteed that particular horse for their ride/lesson on their scheduled days, instead of rotating schoolhorses. It doesn’t imply control over the rest of the horse’s schedule, that day or otherwise. Probably best to clarify the expectations of this barn’s culture.
5 Likes
That doesn’t seem to be of much value. A full lease means that horse is basically yours. A half lease seems like it should mean the horse is yours half the days.
2 Likes
When I have part leased my horses in the past, I always told them I was going to be doing tune up rides because I found that my horse needed them. BUT, it should be disclosed up front.
As for the horse being ridden twice in a day, it really depends on how much work, how close together the rides are, and what kind of work. If I get on my horse for a 20-minute tune up ride, I think they’d be perfectly capable of being ridden by someone leasing her. That’s not the same as doing an intensive jump lesson. Again, it’s the communication part that’s lacking.
That said, I loaned my girl to a friend this morning for a trail ride and this afternoon she told me she’s filing a complaint with management about having to go out twice in one day.
As for the shows, it’s a good time for you to bring this up with the owner. You don’t have to be confrontational but mention that you’re unsure how it will work if weekend days are part of your half lease and the other girl wants to show. What you don’t want to have happen is a tug of war over who gets to ride and find out you’re both showing.
4 Likes
Don’t recall if this was mentioned upthread – OP, has the horse owner leased out her horse in the past? How much experience does she have with leasing?
If the owner is still somewhat new to leasing, or maybe hasn’t previously done two half-leases or whatever else is going on, she might be on a learning curve, too. She may not have anticipated some things that are coming up now.
There is a possibility that everyone needs a reset & review on how this is working. But at that point perhaps some changes could be made, and hopefully things become much better for everyone.
2 Likes
Well, it depends . At Barns of that type having the ability to ride the same horse every time is valuable to some people, and it’s an expense of like $300-$400 a month. Half of the horse’s expenses at a modest board rate.
3 Likes
A local barn around here considers this a “lease”, as well. Not conventional as what some think of one but is their structure. They pay over 300 for a free ride and a guaranteed lesson ride, price goes up for additional rides. They also will lease out to someone else, with whoever signed first with first refusal for showing, if they want. The horses can be used in lessons. They aren’t worked into the ground, I think I see behavior differences based on the riders. The amount they are doing is certainly not grueling, plus they have limited turn out. As an owner, I’d certainly want to be able to get on the horse to see how it is going, nothing nefarious about it. It sounds like the OP needs to look into the lease terms and barn culture. Not what I want for my horse, but it’s not my rodeo.
3 Likes
Both mean whatever the contract in front of you says they mean.
There is no set in stone rules about what any of those terms mean.
4 Likes
Correct. Which is why I said seems and should. There are multiple way to monetize horses.
I loaned my mare to a friend to have her top students put rides on her. One of her other students wanted to half lease her but when friend mentioned paying for it, the mother got all huffy and pulled her student out of the program. She thought she could 1/2 lease my horse but do it for free.
Barn I was in had a “ school lease” program where they were guaranteed that horse for one or two lessons and one or two hacks a week but no exclusivity on those days (no pearl clutching, nothing got overworked).
It is all about what is in that contract and definitions vary by barn. Know before you sign anything.
2 Likes
Yeah I do a lot of half leases but your situation sounds sketchy.
I have double half leased horses in the past, but generally avoid it. I only do it if riders schedules do not conflict and riders are different skill levels (ex. One rider jumps 2’6” and other is w/t learn to canter) that way if their days overlap it’s fine because beginner person rides in the morning and doing a w/t learn to canter lesson is not tiring for the horse and 2’6” person rides in the afternoon and actually keeps the horse a little quieter for the other person so it’s actually beneficial in some ways. But that’s it, horse does no other lessons. Only one person gets to show with the horse because only one person is at the skill level to compete. If either person wants to do a lot more than what they’re doing, time to switch horses.
But yeah that’s like a perfect situation, generally I don’t like doing that. Half leased horses do other lessons, but only light ones of very beginner people where they do a lot of walking.
1 Like
