[QUOTE=newrider;3444733]
The whole point I was trying to make originally is that if you are used to seeing eventing or foxhunting or other more Thoroughbred-type horses, the dressage horses look very different, in part because of their breeding. And because they don’t look like they would be able to go on, for example, a four-hour hunt, someone who is not familiar with the high level of fitness required for what they do might look only at the massive bodies that don’t move with speed and agility as much as suppleness and power (although they are agile too, it just looks different on an 18hh Hanoverian than on, say, a 15hh Anglo-Arab) and think that the body type indicates a lack of fitness.[/QUOTE]
Exactly. :yes: A non-horsey person was looking at the GP dressage over my shoulder at work (
:eek:
) and said, “That one looks really fat. Are they supposed to look like that?” I explained it as the difference between a sumo wrestler and a runner. Both have developed the muscles and fitness they need for their sport, but that the difference in training gives them entirely different looks.
Of course, having said that, I think I’d really rather go out on a cross-country hike with the runner than with the sumo wrestler. 