Where did this come from? I’ve read it several times, but no one has posted the source. That would be having sex with a different person every day for over 27 years. Even if it was every other day, that’d take 55 years! How do you find the time? How do you meet all those people much less get them into bed??? If you started at age 20, you’d be 75 to hit 10,000 averaging 3.5 partners a week. What am I missing here?
1 Like
It came from his book. And as someone else said earlier… if you get more creative in terms of considering situations involving multiple partners simultaneously… the numbers become slightly more possible. Though still implausible.
I find the mentality of anyone who makes such a claim BIZARRE. There is no good explanation. Malignant narcissism.
40 Likes
Isn’t it ironic that Mason Phelp’s PR company is handling George? The grapevine hearsay has worse stories about Mason. Even George recounts in his book how Mason dosed him with acid, but that’s minor compared to other gossip out there. You do wonder who’s next. I shouldn’t be enjoying this, but I kind of am, to be honest.
19 Likes
His book, Unrelenting.
6 Likes
Trainer of trainers.
As was Jimmy Williams.
12 Likes
del
3 Likes
Ahhhh - and there we go, another Jimmy Williams pupil. Quite a trainer of young people.
So so sick.
11 Likes
Is anyone in the FB group to monitor and let us know of anything upcoming that we might want to know about? Crowdfunding, lawsuits, protests etc? Who to avoid…
1 Like
If you factor in bathhouses and other venues for anonymous activity, it’s possible.
9 Likes
Diane Carney is asking people on Facebook to contact the White House. What would the executive branch do? Comes off as quite desperate to me. She has had GHM in for clinics for years.
5 Likes
Lol the current administration signed the SS legislation into law. Goodness.
9 Likes
I have! It’s been done since early July - my apologies for not posting it earlier. Does anyone know if I can attach an excel sheet here? If not, I could also just copy and paste each of the entries. I also need to update it with a few names (July 10-onwards).
2 Likes
Not a political commentary as far as left vs right.
However:
Going to someone who thinks “Grab them by theirs p^$$Y’” is locker room talk is the height of… someone fill in the blank for me. I am losing IQ points reading some of the posts.
40 Likes
That’s true, however the point many are making (Canadian Eric Lamaze included) is the lengthy time span. Although the timing of complaints have been debated and discussed here, it remains a concern for lots of people.
Take SS out of the picture for a moment, and focus just on USEF as a sports corporation with bylaws, and membership rules. Would USEF ban a member for doping, cheating, horse abuse, etc that happened 50 years ago, yet was only recently alleged ? Probably not, because USEF has protest rules that have a time frame for a complaint. However, if there’s a criminal conviction, USEF can move swiftly and take action on their own.
When so many members - some very accomplished and respected - of a large organization push back against their organization’s mandated partnership with a government entity that has the power to override the organization’s own rules, and a commonly accepted standard of judicial due process, their concerns are worth listening to. No member voted to have USEF join SS, yet the membership is quickly dividing.
Could you upload it to Google Sheets? It’s free and you can make it so anyone who has the link can view, but not edit.
On an unrelated note, I know one of the main (and IMO, most valid) complaints about Safe Sport’s bans is the lack of transparency around the investigative process. One of my friends who’s an attorney posted something that got me thinking. (I know she reads this board so feel free to jump in if I’m mischaracterizing your statement—I couldn’t remember whether you said it here or on Facebook so I couldn’t refresh my memory.) She talked about how the process of disbarment for things like sexual misconduct is more transparent and maps closer to the court system than the Safe Sport investigative process. Now I think it makes sense that the process for disbarring an attorney would be closer to the normal legal system than it would for sanctioning a member of a sport club, but it did get me thinking about how that maps on to other professional licensing bodies, so I looked into it a bit.
In my state (Oregon), the medical board’s investigation process is remarkably similar to Safe Sport’s. Even the flow chart looks pretty much the same, though it does include the flow into the court system which Safe Sport’s doesn’t. Our state medical board’s policy maps on very closely to the Federation of State Medical Board’s policy document Addressing Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for State Medical Boards so it’s not just Oregon. You’ll notice how Section IV advocates for the discretion to close hearings related to sexual misconduct to encourage victim participation, though it does mention that some states may have statues on the books that preclude closed hearings for medical board complaints.
The notices of disciplinary action from the Oregon Medical Board are very interesting to me, and I wonder if adopting a similar process might help with some of the more mild pushback from folks in these high-profile cases. The board releases a monthly summary of actions taken that includes a summary of the process and findings of fact, both with the statute numbers the licensee was accused and found of violating. Here’s the most recent month’s; I found Duane Stanley Bietz’s case on page 8 of the PDF to be a good example. Obviously medicine has very strict patient confidentiality laws, and as you can see the report has no real details on what happened, just the specific statutes that were violated. It’s really just an extension of what Safe Sport puts out already, but with citations that tie back to the code and a summary of the actions the board took to reach the decision.
Now, I’m not naive enough to think that this would be enough to pacify everyone; there’s a significant chunk of our sport that just doesn’t want to believe ANY report of sexual misconduct, and even more in cases that might involve a BNT/BNR. But I do think something like that summary of actions would help educate reasonable people on the Safe Sport process and alleviate some of the backlash (which, IMO, is deeply harmful to survivors).
5 Likes
This is hilarious.
Trump is anti chil abuse, not to get into a political debate AT ALL - Im not American people lol but anyways, he is one of the reasons for the fall of Hollywood and Epstein. Regardless of what people think of him, he 100% would not support a man who is thought to abuse children. The me too and victim strength movement are makings of this government.
11 Likes
And who defended that fine horseman, Roy Moore.
I’ve always found many BNT’s to be kind of, well, dumb? insulated? but they are outdoing themselves.
20 Likes
Also judging by the updated list, someone who was previously on the list, is now off the list, and I know for a fact he was abusive to students, and had an innapropriate controlling relationship with at least one, not to mention abused horses regularly. So clearly if there wasn’t enough evidence there to keep him on it, the evidence to ban someone for life must be pretty overwhelming.
14 Likes
del
9 Likes
I’m sure that the response would be that they are “very good people…”
14 Likes
