[QUOTE=Bluey;3685992]
—“And, um, er. . if you ave a totally Independent seat and good balance, does it really matter if you keep putting your hands on the horses neck? If you have been taught to jump with no hands, hands on hips, hands out to side, hands on head then why is the crest release really harmful? The crest release and ducking and laying down on the horse are not the same thing.”—
A following hand will help support the horse at landing, if it needs support and will have you ahead if you are in a tight course or jump off.
I can’t see a crest release and jumps coming at you fast and furiously be near as effective in what you and your horse can do as with some real straight line contact, so you can be effective every second of the ride, if you need to.
That is why you do need a very secure and independent seat and proper leg to be consistently correct.
We should take advantage of all the aids at our disposition.[/QUOTE]
I will stick my head out to be flamed and say that most riders don’t press their hands on the crest, but just float them there. And a lot of riders float them lower, but not with a straight line.
I personally (this is the part that will get me charred) am not necessarily sold on the straight line to elbow being so great. Indeed, with some angle in your arm, you actually have a little more feel and control and option of how you can move your hand independent of your own body and to wherever your horse’s head ends up. With the straight line, you’re forced to make all adjustments in your shoulder; with the broken line, you can use your shoulder or your elbow to change the rein pressure/position/contact.
A straight line is the right choice for some reasons, the broken line for others, but I think that the argument now may be as much or more aesthetic than functional.
And now, younger people just think the straight line looks old fashioned and weird.