[QUOTE=Sandy M;2938874]
No, it is not an exact quote, but it is the tenor of her article. While she says she has worked with lesser horses (and indeed, still does), her statement was to the effect that better horses make better riders (I feel better TRAINING makes better riders), and that efforts with lesser horses are wasted.[/QUOTE]
Speaking as an old English teacher, it is incorrect, and a misrepresentation of authorship, to put things into quotation marks that are not direct, word for word, repetition of what the person actually said.
Yes, Cindy did say something “to the effect that” better horses help people to become better riders. Whether the particular horse is “better” by virtue of its breeding, its training, or a combination of both, I don’t think that anyone with much experience or sense would dispute the fact that being able to feel a movement or gait properly executed will greatly assist any rider’s ability to learn to ride that movement or gait in the future and thereby make the person a better rider. This does not mean, nor did Cindy say, that efforts with lesser horses are “wasted.” We learn different things from different horses and will learn more the more different ones we ride. Unfortunately, both horses and riders are often “taught” things that it might be best they never learned: e.g., under a “lesser” rider, a horse can learn to grab the bit and bolt for the barn, and, conversely, such a “lesser” horse can “teach” a rider to acquire a defensive posture it can take years to unlearn-- ideally, on “better” horses.
Yes, training does make better riders, but I would like to submit that we are to a large extent trained by the horses we ride, for better or for worse, just as they are trained by us. That’s why Podhajsky wrote My Horses, My Teachers, and also why it makes sense for each of us to buy the best horses (for our purposes) that we can afford.