[QUOTE=BravAddict;7726160]
I’m not a breeder, but personally, if it were my mare, and she were physically unable to consume enough calories to maintain condition while she nursed her foal for a perfectly normal amount of time, I would conclude that raising a baby was too much for her body.
As for cost efficiency, I can’t laugh at it, but I don’t think I’d apply this rationale to my horse and her hypothetical foal, either! It smacks of a feedlot to me. Sure, I might save a few bucks (or even more than a few bucks, if I have a lot of foals) by weaning earlier, but at what cost? And then, there will be plenty of people who think they’re making a financially sound decision, but negate the money-saving benefits by feeding some specially-marketed baby food.
I don’t mean to pick on you, I just happened to disagree with both of your points at the same time.[/QUOTE]
OK, so as you say, “not being a breeder” you have NO idea how much feed, corn oil, alfalfa and pasture it takes to keep my mare in good flesh. It’s certainly not a matter of just a few dollars (and btw, since when did concerns about overhead become equated with a feedlot mentality).
This mare’s filly will most likely be weaned at about six months, and her best buddy will most likely be weaned at a little over five months so they can be weaned together. And I don’t think it makes a bit of difference whether its four, five or six months - or a year for that matter. The mares DO cut back on how much they allow their babies to nurse after a while.
Oh, and btw, she gets bred because she produces super foals and loves being a mommy. On years she has been open, she’s been very jealous of the mares with foals at their sides.