I think that is a very one side way to see showing, not at all what showing horses represent.
There is plenty of very good riders, excellent horsemanship, great trainers and their students and horses doing everything right.
There is, as in everything, some that are not as good, but to be fair, we should evaluate it all, not just point out to what we think is not right?
As for the question of showing, for many it gives their riding focus, for the horses a specific training and goals to work for when there are shows.
Decades ago, showing was where we were judged by a judge or a course in how well we had trained, how far our horses, ourselves, our students were and were a place to study how others fared and learn from it all.
There are also others than the competitors themselves, the supporting staff and family and friends, breeders, horse owners that may not ride but have others riding their horses.
There is a whole world out there around competing with horses.
For a large part of the horse world, all kinds of showing has been what fueled so much we have today in our horse world, so much more we may have, that we wonât without it.
Without competitions, we will lose a large part of what helps the horse world be as interesting and fulfilling to many as it is.
Saying horse competitions turn horses into a mere tool of competitors would be like thinking trail riding makes the horse a mere conveyance to get from point A to B, may as well use a four wheeler.
This is a good question, the world is going to change from now on in unknown ways, the horse world also, is a given.