[QUOTE=NoDQhere;8004173]
I guess the point I was trying to make was that not all Appaloosas look like QHs. There have always been a few breeders that didn’t drink the AQHA koolaide and tried to breed a beautiful, quality Appaloosa horse, WITH COLOR. My Mom was one of those and it seems to have rubbed off on me :yes:.
As an aside, up until the 80s or so the QH was bred as a working horse and those old bloodlines were pretty good horses. IMO it was the breeding for halter horses and the specialization that hurt the quality of most of the popular breeds.[/QUOTE]
Well the Appy folks running the Association back in the 1980s changed the Registration rules allowing plain horses to compete and win against the colored horses equally. Then they hired QH Judges for the Championships. Guess who got places highest? Wasn’t the colored horses!! That ruling was almost the blow of death to the Breed, made the color unneeded to be an App Champion!! Luckily the present folks have changed the Rules again, so color on a horse is required, though I am not up on the exact wording of current Rules to show as an App.
Just was a BAD decision, based on breeders not having a market for those plain colored foals produced, that paid back what breeders had invested in those plain horses.
Good grief, first thing you expect when Appaloosa name is mentioned, is COLOR on them. It is their marker of special-ness!! A Dalmation dog without spots is just a white dog.
Lot of nice photos of good looking horses from the past. Too bad the quality of many has deteriorated so badly they are not clear to view. Lot of the old standbys, famous for years of showing and their production of quality foals. Thanks for the links