[QUOTE=wateryglen;7717707]
Another thought…I’ve always wondered about whether WHERE in the US you get your qh and whether there are differences. I see; here in the east; too many of the short, stocky, heavy bodied qh with small legs and teeny feet. I prefer the better built foundation stock types that are proportioned better with bigger feet. I’d rather one from out west I’d bet. Maybe a ranch horse from Montana or something!![/QUOTE]
It really just depends on the individual, and what sort of program they came out of, more than location. Mine came out of Missouri.
This is my guy: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/t1.0-9/1773_10152410206300215_668475863_n.jpg
He’s clearly a QH, no one is going to mistake him for anything else (although I actually do get a baroque breed here and there now that he’s all grey!), but he’s got solid legs and appropriately sized feet. He’s been barefoot and never taken a lame step in the 11 years I’ve owned him. He’s a solid 15.2.
He was a stud for six years and came out of a ranch program. Despite being an English horse with me, he can still go out and work a cow like nobody’s business. He IS Impressive-bred (the “god father” of all those stereotypical beef cattle halter horses) but he was bred to be a working horse that had to hold up.
I’ve hunter-paced with him, did the 4H stuff, hunter shows, eventing, 1st level dressage, fooled around with cow stuff in an english saddle, did some competitive trail, and even took a spin on the polo field a time or two. He’s the epitome of the “all around QH.”
I wouldn’t hesitate to get another. As he started to age I got a TB mare to be his up-and-coming replacement…although I love her, I do find myself occasionally regretting the decision slightly as she steps on my foot spooking at the hose that’s been there for three weeks… :lol: