I just wonder which tradition this rule is trying to protect.
Rust breeches and pale linen jackets of the 80s?
Velvet chokers from the 70s?
Loud plaid tweeds from the 60s?
True canary breeches with flares from the 50s?
All of these things are gone now but were perfectly acceptable and even expected in their day.
PleaseâŠI beg you Equine CanadaâŠplease please pleaseâŠkeep all discussion of jacket colour and trim out of our rules, âŠpleeeeeeeeeeese! (We currently just state jackets must be worn unless a judge deems it too hot lol)
That is exactly my question. This really just sounds like somebody fussing about a personal vision of what a rider âoughtâ to look like in the ring, in a division where the riderâs appearance is not being judged.
Hereâs Jackie Kennedy in a contrast-collar hunt coat on Thanksgiving Day Hunt (and this illustration shows a contrasting collar on a womenâs riding habit from the 1840âs.) Plaids, checks, and herringbones were seen in menâs shooting attire through the 1800s and are likely to have been worn hunting as well, both a light pattern on a dark base and a dark pattern on a light base.
Personally, the only reason burgundy coats bother me is that the particularly light-colored ones look like scarlet. In that sense itâs kind of appropriating colors a rider isnât entitled to wear (USET coat or hunt staff.) I think the wine-colored ones look sharp on dark and gray horses.
I showed in my burgundy AA jacket all season and won championships in Thermal and Thunderbird. Two of my barnmates also show in the burgundy jacket (and we wear classic velvet helmets). We have never been disqualified or even admonished by a judge. I did email USEF prior to purchasing my jacket and I was told, in an email, that burgundy is not prohibited.
Arenât contrasting collars traditionally worn by someone who has earned their âcolorsâ as a member of a hunt? So maybe that is the rationale for excluding them.
I donât compete in the hunter classes, at least not at recognized shows, but I really couldnât care less if someoneâs jacket is dark burgundy or light blue or whatever. Still, I could sort of see trying to prevent people from wearing jackets that make it look like they earned something they didnât.
Thatâs an interesting point. I know that that is one designation hunts use to recognize members who have earned their colors, but I donât know if itâs historically been the only purpose of a contrast-color collar. I believe thereâs at least some element of fashion, as shooting and sporting clothing also featured contrasting colors for the sake of style.
Um Mrs. Kennedy had gotten her hunt colors which is the reason why the collar contrasts. It has nothing to do with fashion, despite her reputation as a fashionista.
the first hunt coat I had was in 1968. A Britney of New York, bought used for the princely sum of $4. It belonged to one of the Woodington girls. I still have it, a lovely green buff and brown. tiny houndstooth. beautifully tailored and sewn. My mom patched repaired some moth holes exclaiming how beautifully made the coat was.
I also had a beautiful Pytchley , circa 1980 a beautiful gray blue tweed, man that was a beautiful coat.
Iâm all for tradition, but weâve really jumped the shark in the hunter ring is someone feels itâs a pressing necessity to exclude burgundy coats by rule. Honestly, who cares?
Finished her round and the judge radioed the gate and said they werenât using her and why. Recommended that she change coats before showing again. Kid was (in my opinion, rightfully) annoyed and pretty vocal about it on social media.
But Aviation Blue is not bright! It is more of a muted dull grey-blue. And one could argue, using Ralph Lauren decor from the 90âs as an example, that it doesnât get a lot more conservative than burgundy and hunter green - the two very colors for the era based on their own stodgy hunt club theme. Even Audi mocked hunter green and burgundy in their âsay goodbye to old luxuryâ ad campaign.