Years ago we were chatting about bowlers and Equibrit said something about people looking like a “blob on a cob”. It was hysterical, and yeah an ASTM helmet in the same design would exacerbate the “blob on a cob” look, especially for people with a round face.
I realize we’ve strayed from Jody’s request not to focus on looks. But we’re all human and no one wants to look like a science experiment gone awry.
I notice that the skunk stripe helmets seem to be all the rage - but if I recall from the Mark Davies study that brand/model was inferior in terms of safety, even though it is ASTM certified. Meaning - other brands/models performed better - though they all still met the requirements.
There are lots of brands/models out there, but evidently they do not all perform the same when compared. In the case of the skunk stripe design… it seems fashion/appearance/trendiness is still a significant factor when choosing an ASTM certified helmet.
You’d think people would buy the one that performed the best when tested. But we still don’t. Seems that even when faced with the possibility of an ASTM certified helmet saving us from a TBI or mitigating one… many horsemen still favor looks/fashion/trendiness over performance. Does the helmet make us look “tough” or more like athletes in other sports. Does the helmet show the world we can afford expensive equipment. Does the helmet resemble equipment from another age.
Or maybe people believe that ALL ASTM certified helmets perform exactly the same, and there is NO difference among helmets except appearance. So choosing one as a status symbol or fashion item is perfectly fine.