Who are the recent ancestors? I wouldn’t be blaming shoulder asymmetry or high/low on Royal Charger or Turn To. In your horse those are ancestors, and very unlikely to play a part in high/low or shoulder asymmetry.
Those are two of the more valued sport lines in TB sport breeding, and in some irish breeding (ISHs). They’re not ‘nobody names’ - both of those stallions covered hundreds of mares and have a very proven record in terms of what they passed on to their progeny.
By the time you get to Royal Charger or Turn To in a modern horse, you’ve got about 61 other horses in the mix - and that is if either RC or TT are on the first page (5-gen)… if they are further back, which most are (remember, these are 1942 and 1951 editions…) you’re looking at nearly twice that number of individuals besides RC or TT that could possibly have contributed to the mix…
I see this a lot, but people are always so quick to blame the “other half” of a pedigree versus looking hard and up close at the dam and the sire of the horse with issues. The apple rarely falls far from the tree.
Something else to consider about RC and TT’s involvement in this… The c6/c7 malformation is as ubiquitous in WBs as it is in TBs. Turn To and Royal Charger are not foundation lines in WBs; they do show up occasionally through the damline, but not at the frequency they would need to be the root of this issue in the modern sport horses.
This malformation comes from much, much further back than horses born in the 1940s.