Let me make sure I have this straight…
You drop in with a diatribe about owners who expect free euthanasia. Which is certainly valid, but not particularly applicable to the conversation at hand. No one has asked for or is expecting a free euthanasia. (That’s very kind of you to extend to your regular patients, though.)
When pointed out that the problem was the requirement for bloodwork/further testing to even consider euthanasia, you said that the op didn’t say that, even though it was clearly stated.
And then you doubled down, saying that the issue was the OP didn’t want to trouble herself with the drive to the treating veterinarian.
When called on that incredibly callous remark you say (checks notes) that it “wasn’t directed” at the OP.
Do I have all that right?
Forgive me, I’m just kind of agog at the progression here. Especially toward someone working through an incredible loss of their kitty. There’s no doubt that some owners have a misplaced sense of entitlement regarding veterinary services, including euthanasia, but that’s certainly not our OP here.