But Ms. Peslar doesn’t appear to consider herself “wronged”, as I see it, following the lawsuit, and the events and info made public.
She likely said, "I need a new horse, and It needs to fit X and X and X criteria, and, I need it to be under a million. Her trainer said, “I think I know one”. Or, “I know someone who has horses to sell for people in that price range and fitting our criteria.”
And he went to his former business partner and asked what she had in the stable, and it’s likely SHE is the one who went, “OH YUMMY! A BUYER!”
And she made the horse fit the $900K budget through these shenanigans, after telling the seller that the horse couldn’t bring that kind of money. And so he and his lady/client went and rode the horse and loved the horse and made an offer. And they didn’t know about the shenanigans.
The shenanigans only meant the broker and her helpers (her father, and the guy in Belgium) pocketed pieces of the difference-- $600K. And the shenanigans brought a lawsuit on her, when the person who was told it was a $300K horse found out about the real sale price. Because people did talk amongst themselves and it got back to her.
But the person who spent the $900K got a horse, and she probably loves it, and it was probably $100K under budget.
She doesn’t care so much about the shenanigans, she’s loving her horse. I mean, she’s probably thinking, “Damn, I could have paid THAT MUCH less?” But she’s not super wounded because, that was what she had to spend. $900K. To most of us, $600 in a scheme is pretty damn wronged. To some people, it’s another life’s lesson and something to pay better attention to, next time around.
And her trainer who found the horse for “them” likely didn’t even know that the seller was being told the horse wasn’t worth their budget.