Los Angeles Equestrian Center

Aww. Sid had a super sweet face!

1 Like

I remember seeing the horse trails that looked like they went straight up and down in the area around San Juan Capistrano and thinking those trail horses must be pretty darn fit!

Another time, I did the tour at Hearst Castle, and the recording on the bus (by Alex Trebek, for some reason) said that the Hearst family originally would ride horses from the entrance where we got on the bus to the current location of the castle complex, which started out as their camping area.

It took fifteen or twenty minutes on the bus, going on a road with a steep incline and tons of switchbacks, so I can only imagine how long it would take on a horse.

1 Like

HOw the heck do you block? I’ve been looking everywhere?

That quote is from this thread in the technical help section of the forum.

4 Likes

Thank you! I stupidly thought I could just click on the person and it would come up.

2 Likes

Just asking 
 Are we more interested in protecting the horse industry or the actual horse?

I am confused by this question

I mean, I know what the words mean, I do not understand what the question has to do with the topic.

I will say, just because you (general) do not do things how I do them, does not mean your way is wrong or abusive or any of those things.

13 Likes

It was in response to a post made by Peggy regarding the lack of turnout in many places. Don’t know how to got to you. It was post # 323.

1 Like

There were no papers as far as I know. My mom might have known something about his history but she’s gone. Given that he was owned by the proprietor of a boarding/rent stable in the 1960s he could have come from anywhere. We do know that his former owner’s name was Sid😆. He may have been gelded late since he deposited his manure in a neat stack like some stallions do, but that’s not helpful. She did keep him in one if the few box stall with a run as opposed to the many larger paddocks on the property so maybe he didn’t appreciate a lot of contact with neighbors.

1 Like

Thank you for explaining.

Just a FYI, to make posting easier for you and those reading your posts - If you hit the reply button in the lower right corner (see screen shot below with it boxed out in red) it will add the symbology in the upper right corner that makes it clear who you are responding to and what post. The replied to information allows the read to click it and expand to show the post being replied to (refer to second screen shot below).

3 Likes

The industry is the protection for the horse, the government certainly doesn’t care.
Eliminating horse ownership throughout the urban southwest and vast swathes of California, because it feels foreign to you despite thousands of horse owners doing it successfully, isn’t the answer.

19 Likes

Switched to a computer to answer this so I could multi-quote, but dags beat me to it. No horse industry, or limiting the horse-keeping area to areas deemed “suitable,” means way fewer horses. It also means little to no research that benefits horses, fewer horse-related products, fewer options for keeping horses, fewer horse professionals, including vets, and so on.

20 Likes

I don’t think this is very relevant when research has shown that horses NEED movement for fitness, gut health, social needs etc etc. There’s a good reason why some countries like Sweden and Germany have legal regulations that require turnout for horses.

Land is scarce in some areas, of course, but with proper space management and a little less fuss over turnout booboos and shenanigans there can be improvements. 4 hours
 8 hours
 overnight, etc. Anything is better than nothing or, at best, 1 hour outside alone in a tiny limestone lot.

Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should.

6 Likes

But we have, over the years, and they didn’t die.

Would I keep a horse this way? I don’t think I would. But I have been fortunate enough to live in MD.

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Every horse would be better off in a nice meadow in, say, Maryland, without a job. I’d be happier on a beach without a job :rofl:

I don’t think (most of) the horses in CA are living a tough life, even if it is not the Elysian Fields.

19 Likes

I just feel like that’s a very, very low bar to set.

3 Likes

Somehow we have gone from establishing what are “optimal conditions for horsekeeping” to “not providing certain conditions is cruelty.”

13 Likes

Or hyperbole

10 Likes

There are currently two horses in their 30’s at my very urban barn. One was born there and never lived anywhere else. Two others over thirty have passed in the last few years, also only boarded there. All well cared for and doted on, thrived on little to no turn out when they were ridden, 30-60 minutes in retirement, and maybe a hand walk.

Is it optimal? No. I’m jealous of the videos on here of horses cavorting in green pastures.

Can horses live long, healthy lives in an urban environment? Yes.

Pardon the profanity. It comes with the territory.

25 Likes

Yes I know the statement itself is hyperbole, but what it actually means is that it’s “fine” so long as they have food, water, and shelter.

1 Like

I know all about the “3 F’s” – but I’ve either ridden, cared for, or owned more horses than I can even estimate – and I can come up with multiple examples of horses that (for their own good) needed to be denied at least one of the “F’s.” I can certainly give you examples of horses than needed to be denied one of each of those categories. We try the best we can – for our horses, and ourselves. And I can guarantee you that generally the horses don’t know that they are being deprived.

7 Likes