I’m happy he’s still employed, that’s all. Looking for jobs sucks.
7 Likes
Once again, you’re wrong.
13 Likes
I’m not interested in continuing arguing with you considering I’ve provided the screenshots multiple times over multiple threads. I’m content to rely on the other readers memory of the screenshots I’ve provided and my own good standing of credibility in the other readers eyes. Feel free to go search YT and the old threads yourself and post your own screenshots if you want to engage me on this further or think you have some proof as to the error of my statements.
18 Likes
She left her guns, the Walthers, in NC, remember? Now where do you imagine that she left the gun that you imagined that she had? Note-all in your imagination.
Yes, size and strength do matter in physical interactions. That is why wrestling and boxing are separated by size, weight, and so far gender.
Billy Jean King best Bobby Riggs in tennis but her muscles measured as more developed, she was faster, and she was a much better tennis player.
Didn’t Lauren admit at the trial that she had access to Michael’s office, where the gun was kept?
So weird to me that people ignore the fact that Lauren has bragged about her ability to beat up Michael and control Michael but some people want to think of her as a meek delicate flower who can not do a single thing. So very weird.
Again, she said under oath that she went all crazy on him and blocked his ability to leave or get into his truck. Her size does not matter one bit.
I would rather discuss how totally inappropriate it is that Jonathan Kanarek sent an email to the judge in the civil case.
34 Likes
Amazingly, the guns left in NC were not the only existing guns in the world or even (get this) New Jersey.
20 Likes
I find it interesting that some users seem to have no issue with Jonathan Kanarek contacting Judge Sceusi and they actually raise the ludicrous possibility that he copied the other attorneys to talk smack about them to their face. What gives Kanarek the arrogant idea he should contact anyone in this civil suit other than respond to the subpoena issued to him? Obviously he hasn’t announced himself as an attorney representing anyone. He’s just daddy mopping up, yet again. He crossed a line this time and he knows better. Bully tactics!
32 Likes
Makes me wonder what IM would say about that email since IM said they were doing things the proper way but the defendants’ lawyers didn’t get the responses. 
11 Likes
@eggbutt your post makes me wonder some things. Hopefully the legal types can clarify (they are SO VERY generous with their time and I am VERY thankful for that).
Since Jonathan Kanarek is not party to this lawsuit, he is just the father of the person who filed it and someone who is being asked to provide evidence, does he have a right to contact any of the lawyers involved other than answering what has been asked of him? Is that done? Does the father of the plaintiff reach out to opposing council and the judge ever?
7 Likes
@ekat, In that response Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya said that he and Kirby Kanarek/@Seeker1 gave the information to their lawyers (with an s on the end so more than one). Strange that no lawyer or lawyers have filed anything with the courts that they represent Jonathan Kanarek or Kirby Kanarek.
15 Likes
Never. Never, is contacting the judge ok. It’s always improper. If you needed to get them an emergency notification like, you are stuck behind a traffic accident and going to be late to court to testify, you still don’t contact the judge - you contact the attorneys, the vacuumers, etc.
Even as a non-lawyer type like my dad - it’s not ok to contact the judge.
The other lawyers - sure. The attorneys can tell Pops whether or not they want to communicate with them and how, but they can’t stop Pops from reaching out unless it becomes distracting, burdensome, harassing, or something.
18 Likes
Or, you know, answered any of the pending motions.
13 Likes
In my job I receive subpoenas (plural) every day - five days a week. I ALWAYS respond with “Service accepted and the subpoena will be forwarded to the appropriate legal counsel” - and then log it on a spreadsheet. When we send documents by email we always follow up to confirm the documents were received. It’s not rocket science. It’s not time consuming. It’s good business.
26 Likes
In hindsight, it’s even more remarkable that JK/IM would come on here and post all this (seemingly false) information just to hit the proverbial ping-pong ball back and forth with everyone here on the BB. Ditto for KK/Seeker.
Who does that??
18 Likes
Billy Jean King was 29. Bobby Riggs was 55 years old.
9 Likes
Well yes. Valid point.
Wouldn’t the lawyers for Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya ) and Kirby Kanarek ( @Seeker1 ) have proof that they sent something along to the other lawyers? Wouldn’t they have filed it however these lawyers do so it shows up on the website?
Are we supposed to believe that the information was lost between their lawyers and all of the other lawyers involved?
7 Likes
Hey, what are you doing? Introducing relevant factual statements into the conversation?!? Lol.
13 Likes
Scandalous.
6 Likes
And Jonathan Kanarek/IM’s best move going forward was to have his daughter’s lawyer file a late, inappropriate Motion to Quash and Then go forward and send an ex parte communication to the judge, instead of having their lawyers say, “HOLD UP! We did it right! Here’s Proof!”
It’s just…bizarre.
26 Likes
And I would bet a bunch of money the appropriate legal counsel just doesn’t say, “No thank you.” And ignores the multitude of subpoenas. Because legal counsel knows better. Or should.
But it’s good having you to track and confirm and making sure they are all get to the right place! 
9 Likes
