This is interesting, Baffert is getting his money worth from his attorney. So Baffert’s Lawyer is now arguing that the disqualification cannot stand because it was betamethasone valerate not betamethasone acetate and only the latter is used for IA injections. Isn’t this argument the first time they have raised this point? In effect, that the “ointment” betamethasone is legally useable on race day? (I have attached a description of betamethasone valerate below-- which does seem like it acts as a general anti-inflammatory…)
I have attached references for greater minds --but at first glance -
- Under the rules, betamethasone (does not designate which type) is a Class C drug-.
- The Kentucky regulations only refer to penalties for Class C drug violations.
- It seems Baffert’s lawyer is leaning heavily on the “withdraw” guidelines which seem to focus on the IA injection type only and does not specifically refer to the ointment version.
- Will they make a due process argument that the withdraw guidelines did not lay out any time lines for the ointment form? (But there are lots of general caveats in the guidelines. )
- Dumb question, I assume if something is classified as a class c-- just because it is not specifically mentioned as a prohibited substance per withdraw guideline does not make a positive test for it ok? That would make no sense, right,-- which seems to be the lawyer’s argument?
- Regardless the reason for these drug rules is to keep racing fair and protect the horse, if this stuff ends up in the blood stream at a higher than allowed level does it matter which type was used?
Some references for the curious:
https://khrc.ky.gov/Documents/Chapter%208-020-1-Drug%20and%20Medication%20Classification%20Schedule%20-%20Final.pdf
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Betamethasone-valerate