Regarding the footnote, would it be improper for the judge to watch the trial if it is not formally entered into evidence?
The flip side of course is that as a matter of law I thought that trial found MB committed the act but was not responsible (yes I know no one agrees with me. that was the legal finding…) and of course me and my collateral estoppel argument (that no one agrees with…oh well) --but I assume collateral estoppel has to be formally raised and the evidence of the prior ruling entered as an affirmative matter by LK. It seems that the new attorney is at least stirring the pot and maybe there will be a movement and hopefully a quick resolution for all.
Then clearly you are not writing things that say what you think they say because everyone else reads your posts to say something different than what you are pretending they now say.
Talking in circles is an art, which I think you believe you have mastered at a higher skill level than you actually have. Kind of like Lauren’s chess skill level, her proclamation of skill versus her real life skill do not match
Still no thoughts on your idol (@Inigo-montoya) ignoring another subpoena?
How about we all plan to take Mr. B and Mr. D to dinner?. And we certainly have to add Mr. S to our invite. I think it would be heavenly to listen to a Silver Soliloquy while sipping a Scotch or Tennessee Whisky - or two or three.
Imagining that LK finally does have to sit for a deposition, remote or otherwise: Will she still be able to deflect questions that she really doesn’t want to answer (because it reflects negatively/exposes her behavior) by using the same tactic she used in the trial…“I don’t recall” ?
He devised this thing using zip ties that went around LK’s arms and attached behind her back to apparently help keep her shoulders back. In other words, a major accident waiting to happen. I wonder if she would have sued him had she fallen and gotten hurt?
Imagine filing a suit and wanting to do F all so that things can actually move along. Imagine your family members doing F all to ensure that things move along and that the legal process is followed. I’m sure it’s all in their 8D chess plan.
I mean, many of the happenings thus far haven’t been exciting, particularly unusual, or even all that surprising.
I don’t know what they do or don’t care about, so I can only “think” or surmise, but based off of what I’ve seen, from afar (thankfully), I don’t think that they give a fig about their behavior or their daughter’s behavior/her behavior being learned from them.
As to why they continue to browse the forums, there could be a few reasons. They might just enjoy logging in and being noticed for all I know.
@ekat and other attorneys, realistically, what are the Kanareks facing here? The likelihood of contempt may be real, but doubtful the judge would jail two retired folks, one being a retired attorney. JK is not licensed in NJ, correct? So not worried about his law license.
The only thing that may be realistic would be paying a fine. And they probably don’t care about that. But that begs the question: why fight the subpoena so hard if you are in possession of evidence in your (Plaintiff’s) favor?