Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

Judge smudge?

19 Likes

Regarding the footnote, would it be improper for the judge to watch the trial if it is not formally entered into evidence?

The flip side of course is that as a matter of law I thought that trial found MB committed the act but was not responsible (yes I know no one agrees with me. that was the legal finding…) and of course me and my collateral estoppel argument (that no one agrees with…oh well) --but I assume collateral estoppel has to be formally raised and the evidence of the prior ruling entered as an affirmative matter by LK. It seems that the new attorney is at least stirring the pot and maybe there will be a movement and hopefully a quick resolution for all.

3 Likes

Then clearly you are not writing things that say what you think they say because everyone else reads your posts to say something different than what you are pretending they now say.

Talking in circles is an art, which I think you believe you have mastered at a higher skill level than you actually have. Kind of like Lauren’s chess skill level, her proclamation of skill versus her real life skill do not match

Still no thoughts on your idol (@Inigo-montoya) ignoring another subpoena?

17 Likes

I doubt everything is lost forever.

3 Likes

His what?

How about we all plan to take Mr. B and Mr. D to dinner?. And we certainly have to add Mr. S to our invite. I think it would be heavenly to listen to a Silver Soliloquy while sipping a Scotch or Tennessee Whisky - or two or three. :wink:

8 Likes

How so? I haven’t had a chance to look at the filings yet.

Love Mr. Silver’s writing style!

11 Likes

That would be nice. I bet they would have interesting stories to tell at dinner!

4 Likes

Imagining that LK finally does have to sit for a deposition, remote or otherwise: Will she still be able to deflect questions that she really doesn’t want to answer (because it reflects negatively/exposes her behavior) by using the same tactic she used in the trial…“I don’t recall” ?

2 Likes

He devised this thing using zip ties that went around LK’s arms and attached behind her back to apparently help keep her shoulders back. In other words, a major accident waiting to happen. I wonder if she would have sued him had she fallen and gotten hurt?

6 Likes

Red robes? With white hoods?

2 Likes

Imagine filing a suit and wanting to do F all so that things can actually move along. Imagine your family members doing F all to ensure that things move along and that the legal process is followed. I’m sure it’s all in their 8D chess plan.

I mean, many of the happenings thus far haven’t been exciting, particularly unusual, or even all that surprising.

14 Likes

Imagine ever having Jonathan Kanarek as your attorney for anything!

8 Likes

Tsk, tsk, tsk @Seeker1 (Kirby Kanarek) and @Inigo-montoya(Jonathon Kanarek)! Not a good look for either of you! Not a good look at all!

I guess we all know for sure now 100% that the apple does not fall far from the tree!

27 Likes

She was taught well. They must be so proud!

6 Likes

Honestly, I don’t think they give a fig.

5 Likes

If they didn’t give a fig, they would not be on COTH daily checking the Barisone threads.

Oh, don’t you doubt they care! But, they care for all the wrong reasons! Right @Seeker1 and @Inigo-montoya?!?!?!

18 Likes

I don’t know what they do or don’t care about, so I can only “think” or surmise, but based off of what I’ve seen, from afar (thankfully), I don’t think that they give a fig about their behavior or their daughter’s behavior/her behavior being learned from them.

As to why they continue to browse the forums, there could be a few reasons. They might just enjoy logging in and being noticed for all I know.

5 Likes

@ekat and other attorneys, realistically, what are the Kanareks facing here? The likelihood of contempt may be real, but doubtful the judge would jail two retired folks, one being a retired attorney. JK is not licensed in NJ, correct? So not worried about his law license.

The only thing that may be realistic would be paying a fine. And they probably don’t care about that. But that begs the question: why fight the subpoena so hard if you are in possession of evidence in your (Plaintiff’s) favor?

11 Likes