Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

[SpicyPRE]

you do realize that MaMa and Papa K have not complied with their subpoenas? If said documents have been turned over there would be no pending contempt findings. But they, the Ks, arent responding to their subpoenas. Ignoring those types of things really leads folks to wonder why… Your comment misses the point that the Ks are the ones not in compliance and are in the hot seat right now.

ETA - that maybe Hut doesnt realize that there are subpoenas that are outstanding, and contempt charges that are pending. The time to properly address the subpoenas has come and gone, a couple of times of now. And yet, the Ks just cant seem be compliant in either producing the documents or responding in a timely manner. In the lawsuit file by their daughter…

[hut-ho78]

I’m waiting to see if the judge scolds the defense for harassing the parents. GAS brought up the second request was too identical to the first which was already quashed.

[SpicyPRE]

do you get that there was a deadline?

[rosinante]

@Knights_Mom

It is actually law that mandates the prosecution reveal any exculpatory evidence that comes up which would vindicate the defendant

True, but it does not always happen. Ref: Mike Nifong’s disbarment for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1834/

The reversal of nine North Carolina capital cases in the last decade, since open-file discovery was mandated for capital post-conviction litigation, demonstrates the ineffectiveness of solely relying on voluntary Brady disclosures, even when the consequence of an unjust conviction would be execution.

[eggbutt]

@hut-ho78

@BigMama1

@hut-ho78

therefore, the defense is harassing the Kanareks

Can you explain how, exactly, the defense is harassing anyone?

GAS explains it in his motion to quash.

I’m not reading his malarkey but you can defend it and post the proof here. It’s easy. Highlight, copy, paste. You can do it.

[Joanne]

@eggbutt

Then GAS needs to assign a real law clerk to read the threads rather than the man who is probably leading him down a huge rabbit hole.

I am thinking that Inigo gave his log-in info to his attorney/law clerk, not that Inigo himself is the one reading so much here.

[McGurk]

Where’s that lunge line image when we need it?

[eggbutt]

Malarkey, BS, Nonsense, Desperation, etc.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Didn’t one of the EIM have the middle finger salute in her avatar ?

No?

[erinmeri]

@pmysliwski

PSA - I was in Lexington at the Crumbl close to closing time. Much to my delight, Crumbl gives away free boxes of cookies which haven’t been sold (still fresh) before closing. They just shouted out “who wants chocolate chip” (that night), I raised my hand and was given a large box of fresh chocolate chip cookies! It was awesome

I am going to do this and then deliver to the staff at my barn. Amazing! (My coffee shop does the same, but it’s small and pickings are slim).

[MHM]

@pmysliwski

PSA - I was in Lexington at the Crumbl close to closing time. Much to my delight, Crumbl gives away free boxes of cookies which haven’t been sold (still fresh) before closing. They just shouted out “who wants chocolate chip” (that night), I raised my hand and was given a large box of fresh chocolate chip cookies! It was awesome

Thank goodness I’m not close to one. I’d be tempted to swing by at closing time every night. Lol.

[3PonyFarm]

Since we did not see a response from the motions yesterday can we assume that Mr D and Mr. Silver are waiting until a date is set for the oral argument requested in the one motion?
If that is the case it is good that they are saving their clients money however WE cannot read them and WE cannot view the court proceedings.

[MorganSercu]

The ones that we bought had crisper edges (but not thin) with a bit of crunch when you bit them and were definitely softer and not quite cakey in the middle - more of a traditional soft cookie texture. They are thick cookies so crisp is harder to get.

[MHM]

@ohnoO

That first motion GAS filed mentions LK paying $5,000-6,000 a month in board. How did I miss that? Since when was she paying more than $5,000?

That statement is so lacking in context it’s ridiculous, given the number of horses involved and what the cost of board should have been under the circumstances, given the facility and level of training available.

[Sdel]

@McGurk

Where’s that lunge line image when we need it?

And our straight lines were so beautiful this morning….

[3PonyFarm]

I want a cookie again, what about you @SoCoPony?

[DownYonder]

@eggbutt

I believe the poster who recently questioned if the MCPO had been led to believe Lauren Shay Kanarek owned HH and Michael was the tenant is on to something. I’m sorry I don’t recall who the poster was and I can’t find the post but I’ve thought that idea might have some basis in fact since I read the post.

I had postulated way back on one of the other threads that LK may have led MCPO and others in the community to believe that she was the owner/co-owner/official lessee of HH. I had even commented that she may have considered herself the doyenne or duchess of HH. And since she is the master (mistress?) of disinformation, I wouldn’t be one bit surprised to learn that other folks were under the assumption that she was the big dog there.

[trubandloki]

@3PonyFarm

Since we did not see a response from the motions yesterday can we assume that Mr D and Mr. Silver are waiting until a date is set for the oral argument requested in the one motion?
If that is the case it is good that they are saving their clients money however WE cannot read them and WE cannot view the court proceedings.

How quickly do you think they typically come up with a response?
I am sure both of those fine lawyers have other things to do and will respond within the required time. They have never neglected to respond to the stupidity of the Kanarek’s lawyer, so I doubt they are going to start now.

[ekat]

@3PonyFarm

Since we did not see a response from the motions yesterday can we assume that Mr D and Mr. Silver are waiting until a date is set for the oral argument requested in the one motion?
If that is the case it is good that they are saving their clients money however WE cannot read them and WE cannot view the court proceedings.

I don’t think we can assume anything yet. They have a timeline in which to respond, which I don’t know for sure what that is in NJ, but I would guess 5-10 days.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

This is the most concise explanation I’ve seen for why the IEM continually insists that anyone expressing a minority opinion by construction has to be some sort of relative or associate of LKs.

It’s your narrative that literally no one could express empathy for LK and push back on the bashing and the hate unless they had a personal association with LK.

It’s been obvious tor a long time, but you stated it explicitly and concisely. Thanks.

What’s so strange about your assertions is that I, and others, HAVE expressed empathy for LK. I, and others, DO hold minority opinions to this day (I, for one, don’t know who shot LK). And yet I don’t feel persecuted for expressing empathy or outlining a minority opinion. I think that may be because, 1) I don’t attack others, and 2) I can see nuance, and 3) I don’t take a monolithic POV, and 4) I don’t belabor my point, and 5) I don’t think that discussing someone’s (very public) bad behavior constitutes “bashing”, “bullying”, “trashing” or “[insert infamatory label here]”. YMMV.