Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

If the defense had a copy of the transcripts given to SS, or the SS report based on one or more transcripts, and that material
doesn’t match the audios, why does the defense need the transcripts?

Where has it been alleged that the defense has a copy of Kirby’s transcripts?

[Angela_Freda]

Same

[MHM]

@eggbutt

Perhaps GAS might want to have a clerk peruse this forum for a heads up on what he may have gotten into.

This is sort of a very specific pop culture reference, but that situation with the clerks would remind me of the two storm troopers in a recent Star Wars movie (The Force Awakens?) coming around the corner and hearing the villain having a meltdown in the next room, and then turning around and walking the other way in a hurry. Lol.

[3PonyFarm]

Kick them!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@erinmeri

@CurrentlyHorseless

Your narrative that literally no one could express empathy for LK and push back on the bashing and hate unless they are associated with her in some way is incorrect.

Ask me how I know.

The flaw in your argument is that you’re inserting something into the post you’re quoting that does not exist. You’re creating a false narrative. Stating that thousands who watched the trial reached a conclusion that you do not like does not mean that nobody can express a different opinion. It’s fact that most people reached said conclusion. AND… It does mean that it makes those with that “minority opinion” look suspiciously like Kanareks and Kanarek associates. Logically speaking, of course. But you get that, right? Your outrage is designed to inflame?

@Knights_Mom stated “I just assume that ANY pro LK poster here or anywhere else is LK or a close associate or family member.”

That’s the statement in her post that I’m responding to.

Obviously I am permitted to express a different opinion, but KnightsMom “just assumes” that anyone “pro LK” is LK, a close associate or a family member.

Her assumption is incorrect. I know it is incorrect because I am none of those things.

[cutter99]

@eggbutt

@3PonyFarm

Why didn’t the MCPO request the videos mentioned in the phone call between RG and JK during their investigation?

There are so many “why didn’t the MCPO…” do so many things any average trained police department would have automatically done. What a complete system failure on so many levels.

I believe the poster who recently questioned if the MCPO had been led to believe Lauren Shay Kanarek owned HH and Michael was the tenant is on to something. I’m sorry I don’t recall who the poster was and I can’t find the post but I’ve thought that idea might have some basis in fact since I read the post.

It was me @eggbutt, and further back on this thread.

In my thinking, how else could the district attorney could have told LK that Michael Barisone had NO rights to restrict her usage and barn time on HIS farm?

There are only 2 explanations for this-

LK is lying about the conversation with the district attorney.

LK lied to the district attorney about who the rightful owner of Hawthorne Hill was.

Either way- LK is still a liar!

[MHM]

@3PonyFarm

The defendant spent 21 years in prison before he was exonerated and he received a 1.3 million dollar settlement.

Honestly, that sounds like a very low number. Less than $62,000 a year to sit in prison for no reason other than incompetence or worse.

[SoCoPony]

Flying hooves of fury…

[3PonyFarm]

I thought so too. That is a lot of years to take away from someone’s life.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Obviously I am permitted to express a different opinion, but KnightsMom “just assumes” that anyone “pro LK” is LK, a close associate or a family member.

Yes I do. This is what I just assume. Why? No other valid reason exists. It is beyond comprehension and beyond the pale that someone would spend years defending the indefensible with such fervor unless there was personal involvement IMO

And I’m entitled to think that and with every additional post my belief is reaffirmed. It’s painfully obvious really.

[Sdel]

@cutter99

In my thinking, how else could the district attorney could have told LK that Michael Barisone had NO rights to restrict her usage and barn time on HIS farm?

Plus:
The curious outcome of not even notifying Barisone that Lauren Kanarek was recording him on his farm.

[roseymare]

Well that sure didn’t affect our teenage ice cream shop employees. Last summers group tried to eat up all of our profits! I have always seen ice cream as pretty self limiting. Not this group. Two or three shakes while working and a large sundae or mixin to go as they were leaving for the night! LOL

[3PonyFarm]

Make sure you have had your rabies vaccination.

[MorganSercu]

Good grief! A coworker worked in an ice cream shop while in high school and she still won’t eat it.

[FitzE]

@IPEsq

It’s soooo strange that the plaintiff and parties related to the plaintiff are trying to delay so much.

So much this! I’ve never heard of such nonsense particularly from the family of the plaintiff. It’s so rare that it strongly suggests something is seriously wrong plaintiff side. No other reasonable explanation.

[3PonyFarm]

They can put their other clients on hold. We have been checking the site and hoping to see something posted!

[rosinante]

@Knights_Mom

Yes but note quite the price was paid for defiance of the law.

I don’t understand what you are saying. Mike Nifong was disbarred.

[MorganSercu]

Yes. Getting disbarred was “quite the price” for defying the law.

[erinmeri]

@hut-ho78

My speculation is not only does the defense have everything, it not only matches, it hurts the defense case; therefore, the defense is harassing the Kanareks and trying to create illusions to hide the negative impact this will all have on MB’s defense when it is released to the public.

If I am understanding your logic circle correctly, the Kanareks have some very damning evidence that is being requested in discovery that HELPS them and HINDERS their adversaries… and yet they refuse to hand it over because their adversaries already have it? And that’s harassment? And somehow by harassing the plaintiff and their associates the defendants will deflect attention from the existence of the very damning evidence? Is that right? Because, if so… that is some impressive mental gymnastics! Am I missing something?

[SoCoPony]

Not only uptd but I have a tin foil hat to wear when not lunging. I get so very tired of the lunging.

Circle
Circle
Circle

Flounce…