If a D.A. insists on pressing charges they can imply complicity on the owners part which will likely be enough to get the owner on board with pursuing it.
Beyond a reasonable doubt. The standard in criminal cases. I donāt think the falling thing is clear enough to a jury to explain horse rebranding. The language is clear on causing it to fall. Not making the horse think it might fall so it brings further under him blah blah blah. Falling is falling. Splat. On the ground. Went boom.
Number 2 of the statute I posted making causing pain, injury like cuts, welts. That works. Juries can see wounds, bumps and bruises. That makes it a criminal act which would render the NDA moot.
Does anyone know anything about the Clinton Anderson horse collapse? I saw some pictures on Facebook but no video of what happened. Not sure if it was him handling the horse or one of his assistants?
Let me guess. CP will argue that the horse ran backwards to avoid loading in the trailer, and he (CP) used the pitchfork only in an attempt to keep the horse from running over him. Or that the horse was kicking at him and had him pinned against a wall and he had to use the pitchfork to defend himself.
Why would one have a pitchfork readily available in hand when loading a horse? That is not a typical device that is used for loading a horse in a trailer. A whip? Sure. Longe line? Sure. Pitchfork? Absolutely not. The only reason to have a pitchfork on hand would be to harm the horse. Period.
He would no doubt argue that one of his workers left it leaning against the wall and when the horse tried to kill him, he grabbed it in self defense.
An even better argument for a jury would be that the horse was about to trample or double barrel a child - gasp - so he had to take desperate measures to protect the kid.
Yeah, I am cynical but I have little faith in LE or the judicial system to punish animal abusers adequately.
This thread is about Cesar Parra, to be sure. But I think that one reason why heās gotten away with such abuse for so long is because of its prevalence. Along with a culture of unquestioningly following the directives of the ātrainer.ā It all needs to stop.
For instance, a trainer local to me wanted to rig up a contraption with ropes and pulleys to force a horse to āwork through the back.ā The horse was resistant due to OCD lesions, not because he woke up one day and decided to be difficult.
If someone wants to start a thread on another abusive trainer, by all means, go ahead. But it doesnāt make sense to bring up CA here. Theyāre not even in the same discipline.
Meh, my horseās poo goes on the same pile as her stablematesā does because itās all poo.
Which reminds me (insert comicreliefjack) a while ago I heard someone on the radio pronounce pooh pooh as poopoo and have been wondering since if other people distinguish between the way they are pronounced. (end crj)