New decision in Holstein

[QUOTE=PNWjumper;8056429]
For starters, those who know Bayhawk know he is more than just talk, though I’m not going to say more than that because there’s no point and he certainly doesn’t need my defense. The people who he cares about knowing what he has produced already know…suffice it to say that he’s no poser (to understate things a bit)!

What I really wanted to say is that the only things disparaging TBs here are the cold hard statistics in the show jumping world and the reality of the horse that the modern day TB has evolved into (what stoicfish said many pages ago and what Down Yonder said a few posts up exactly).

And before you jump on me to accuse me of being a TB-hater, I’m one of the few campaigning my Thoroughbred at the FEI GP level of the show jumping world. My guy is one in a million, but has some serious struggles with the more difficult GP courses based on his very typey TB type. Supershorty is another who is part of our (small) GP-TB club and says the same things about her horse. You’d be hard pressed to find riders more enamored with their horses than us, but boy are we aware of the mismatch between what we’re sitting on and the type of horses the courses are designed for. I can’t think of why you would want to add that potential difficulty to a breed like the Holsteiner that has been bred to handle exactly what we jump today…or maybe it makes more sense to flip that statement around and say that the courses today cater to the skill set of the best WBs.

From that perspective I totally understand the “let my neighbor do it” sentiment. And expanding on ahf’s point, money talks and with TBs generally viewed as inexpensive, half-TBs are often viewed as less valuable than their full WB counterparts. Not saying that’s right, but it is how it is. Perhaps if there were more breeders like Fred, the story would be different. But as it stands now, the breeder who focuses on TBs aimed at the sport of jumping is a rare, rare bird.[/QUOTE]

I’m not the one throwing around terms like hater and jihadist. Besides, I already know that you ride a TB. I have seen videos of Bayhawk’s horses and wasn’t exactly overwhelmed. They looked very nice but they didn’t look like world beaters. Of course, I realize world beaters are extremely rare.

One thing that is most definitely true about bayhawk is that he makes up things about other people in an attempt to bolster his own self image. He certainly has about me. That says nothing about me and a lot about him. If you want to support someone like that, fine. I wish that bayhawk would stop going on about TBs since he doesn’t seem to know that much about them.

I imagine that you are going to find a warmblood that can match your TB a little harder than you thought. Such horses aren’t that common among warmbloods either. Plus, the whole point of using TBs in sportshorse breeding is to breed them for something other than racing. For something, you know, like jumping, since there are TBs out there with that kind of talent, and have a lot of good qualities that many warmbloods lack.

Oh, and before you call me a warmblood hater, I bred a warmblood and will own him for all of his life (out of a TB mare by a Han. stallion). I still wish he had more of her blood traits though. I still don’t know if he inherited his dam’s incredible jump because I’ve never jumped him for various reasons.

Edited to add: I most definitely wish there were more breeders like Fred. Her stallion is an outstanding horse who had produced outstanding horses and she is a class act all the way. That’s kind of been my entire point all along, that I wish there were more breeders like Fred.

Does this wonderful horse look in any way, shape or form look like the old type agricultural type of horse?!
https://www.google.nl/search?q=“cornet+d’amour”&hl=nl&rlz=1T4MERD_nlNL503NL503&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=4skFVd3uBoHuUP7Ag5AG&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=698

[QUOTE=Bent Hickory;8052016]
I don’t speak for Bayhawk, but the objective data regarding free jumping heritability speaks for itself as has already been posted at length elsewhere in this “TB debate.” Here’s a snipet from a post of mine regarding Heraldik, arguably one of the best contemporary TB stallions for show jumping.[/QUOTE]

From horse telex it looks like most of his showjumping offspring were Holsteiners.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;8056466]
I’m not the one throwing around terms like hater and jihadist. Besides, I already know that you ride a TB. I have seen videos of Bayhawk’s horses and wasn’t exactly overwhelmed. They looked very nice but they didn’t look like world beaters. Of course, I realize world beaters are extremely rare.

One thing that is most definitely true about bayhawk is that he makes up things about other people in an attempt to bolster his own self image. He certainly has about me. That says nothing about me and a lot about him. If you want to support someone like that, fine. I wish that bayhawk would stop going on about TBs since he doesn’t seem to know that much about them.

I imagine that you are going to find a warmblood that can match your TB a little harder than you thought. Such horses aren’t that common among warmbloods either. Plus, the whole point of using TBs in sportshorse breeding is to breed them for something other than racing. For something, you know, like jumping, since there are TBs out there with that kind of talent, and have a lot of good qualities that many warmbloods lack.

Oh, and before you call me a warmblood hater, I bred a warmblood and will own him for all of his life (out of a TB mare by a Han. stallion). I still wish he had more of her blood traits though. I still don’t know if he inherited his dam’s incredible jump because I’ve never jumped him for various reasons.

Edited to add: I most definitely wish there were more breeders like Fred. Her stallion is an outstanding horse who had produced outstanding horses and she is a class act all the way. That’s kind of been my entire point all along, that I wish there were more breeders like Fred. [/QUOTE]

Ha Ha ! This is funny…The breeder of one foal and rider of an event horse that has no record is assessing horses she saw on line somewhere.

I could give a rats !@#$ about your assessment of any horse , especially mine.

[QUOTE=PNWjumper;8056429]
For starters, those who know Bayhawk know he is more than just talk, though I’m not going to say more than that because there’s no point and he certainly doesn’t need my defense. The people who he cares about knowing what he has produced already know…suffice it to say that he’s no poser (to understate things a bit)!

What I really wanted to say is that the only things disparaging TBs here are the cold hard statistics in the show jumping world and the reality of the horse that the modern day TB has evolved into (what stoicfish said many pages ago and what Down Yonder said a few posts up exactly).

And before you jump on me to accuse me of being a TB-hater, I’m one of the few campaigning my Thoroughbred at the FEI GP level of the show jumping world. My guy is one in a million, but has some serious struggles with the more difficult GP courses based on his very typey TB type. Supershorty is another who is part of our (small) GP-TB club and says the same things about her horse. You’d be hard pressed to find riders more enamored with their horses than us, but boy are we aware of the mismatch between what we’re sitting on and the type of horses the courses are designed for. I can’t think of why you would want to add that potential difficulty to a breed like the Holsteiner that has been bred to handle exactly what we jump today…or maybe it makes more sense to flip that statement around and say that the courses today cater to the skill set of the best WBs.

From that perspective I totally understand the “let my neighbor do it” sentiment. And expanding on ahf’s point, money talks and with TBs generally viewed as inexpensive, half-TBs are often viewed as less valuable than their full WB counterparts. Not saying that’s right, but it is how it is. Perhaps if there were more breeders like Fred, the story would be different. But as it stands now, the breeder who focuses on TBs aimed at the sport of jumping is a rare, rare bird.[/QUOTE]

Perfect assessment coming from an ACTUAL rider of Grand Prixs !

[QUOTE=DownYonder;8056175]
Elles and others - why do you keep mentioning TBs from past decades that were used for sporthorse breeding?

Do you not understand that today’s TB, and today’s WB are different animals than in the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s, even the 90’s? :confused:

Today’s dressage and showjumping bred WB so far outstrips today’s TB in terms of sporthorse qualities (esp. at the top levels), that adding blood from today’s TB, is - as Bayhawk and others keeping pointing out - going to very, very likely be detrimental to the WB, particularly in the F1 generation. The breeders in Europe know it, and savvy breeders in NA and elsewhere know it, which is why most of them say, “Yeah, let my neighbor do it.” If they need “blood”, they go to another population such as SF, that has been specifically developed for sport horse qualities.

But I suppose a handful of TB fanatics on this forum know SO MUCH MORE about sporthorse breeding than those folks in Germany and Holland, etc., who have seen hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of foals grow up and move into sport (or not). :rolleyes:

And because I just know some of you are going to get on a tangent about event horses, let me state right here and now that my comments above pertain specifically to the disciplines of dressage and show jumping. Breeding for event horses is another beast entirely.[/QUOTE]

Perfect !

[QUOTE=DownYonder;8056277]
1 - It is my understanding they still have to give pre-approval to the breeder to use that stallion.

2 - There probably aren’t a lot of TB stallions out there that they will “pre-approve”.

3 - There probably aren’t a lot of TB stallions out there that the breeders will flock to.

4 - If provides outside options to those folks who focus on breeding event horses, which keeps them in the registry.

5 - It provides outside options to those breeders who are thinking in generations (i.e., looking beyond the F1 offspring).

I am guessing the Verband weighed this decision pretty carefully, and realized that impact on the registry will be fairly minimal.[/QUOTE]

Your understanding is perfect.

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;8056625]
Ha Ha ! This is funny…The breeder of one foal and rider of an event horse that has no record is assessing horses she saw on line somewhere.

I could give a rats !@#$ about your assessment of any horse , especially mine.[/QUOTE]

Again, not true. The horse has a record it’s just not online currently.

Somehow bayhawk you always manage to make these threads about you. It’s very unfortunate.

When you stop making so many disparaging and inaccurate posts maybe you will be worth reading. Until then, no.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;8056640]
Somehow bayhawk you always manage to make these threads about you. It’s very unfortunate.

When you stop making so many disparaging and inaccurate posts maybe you will be worth reading. Until then, no.[/QUOTE]

It’s funny GAP that you insist on saying things like this , instead of holding your tongue and learning from some VERY knowledgeable people on here in both the sport and breeding.

You can’t learn squat when your lips are moving.

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;8056650]
It’s funny GAP that you insist on saying things like this , instead of holding your tongue and learning from some VERY knowledgeable people on here in both the sport and breeding.

You can’t learn squat when your lips are moving.[/QUOTE]

You’re not one of those VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE people, except with regards to Holsteiner pedigrees. I know that because I’ve read your posts. It doesn’t even matter if someone comes on here and defends you, because it’s not as though COTH is a hotbed of breeding horses that have international success. Breeders on here that have used TBs have had a lot of success though, including international success.

I understand the problems associated with using TBs. Yet you seem intent on ignoring everything else, such as WHY Americans are using warmbloods rather than TBs now (and it’s not just because of the courses), WHY Europeans don’t often use TBs (and there’s a lot more than just supposedly “killing the jump”, etc., etc.

I’m not going to waste any more time on you. You’re not worth it.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;8056654]
You’re not one of those VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE people.

You’re a legend in your own mind, apparently.

I’m not going to waste any more time on you. You’re not worth it.[/QUOTE]

Again…you just can’t read for comprehension , nor do you care about trying to learn anything. It’s quite obvious you have very little knowledge regarding anything equine ,yet you refuse to take advantage of others who take the time to post their experience here.

Hi you all!

If I could be permitted to ask a Holstein question that everyone else probably knows the answer to.

Why was the Ethelbert sire line allowed to die out?

I am beginning to believe that this sire line contributed something that may have avoided the TB-Holst. F1 genetic incompatibility, something that may not have been passed to his daughters. Of course I could well be wrong, I don’t know much about the Holstein breed. But to me dropping the Ethelbert sire line sort of looks similar to what would happen if the Morgan breed dropped the Justin Morgan sire line. Yeah, the horses may be more “ideal”, but the Ethelbert sire line seemed to define the Holstein breed, just like Justin Morgan defined the Morgan breed, making it different from all others.

I’m a rank outsider but I got to say: the thoroughbred obsession that traditionally flourishes among a small percentage of the COTH posters is really something else.

Unless you don’t accept that the premise of breeding for a specific discipline produces results (in which case, what are you doing here?) how in the world would it even be possible for thoroughbreds to compete with horses from European registries, which have been purpose bred for showjumping for generations? It would literally be some kind of miracle for that to happen. It would be statistically impossible. Why is this so hard to accept?

Saying the thoroughbred possesses superior crossover talent as a jumper at the highest level of the sport is like saying that a pro in the NBA would be likely to also excel in Major League Baseball. Enthusiasts on this forum puff the TB’s allegedly superior showjumping powers despite the fact they cannot adduce a single data point of evidence from recent years to support their position. Bayhawk is never going to be voted Most Congenial Forum Member because he reminds people of this inconvenient truth every time the subject comes up. Which is, like, a lot. I LOL every time another person reaches into the Wayback Machine and says GEM TWIST! when asked to provide evidence of the thoroughbred’s ability to excel in the world of contemporary showjumping. It’s kind of a punch line at this point.

Look at the clip JER posted on the eventing forum of the steeplechaser Vautour galloping and jumping. this is a magnificent example of a purpose-bred animal doing precisely what he is genetically predisposed to do. Note also that the athletic endeavor in which Vautour excels bears scant resemblance to contemporary showjumping. It speaks to the heart and athleticism of the TB horse that individuals do occasionally have the ability to compete at the highest levels of a discipline that bears little connection to the purpose for which they were bred. Isn’t this remarkable? Isn’t it enough?

The reason that people use words like “jihadists” is because the position flies in the face of common sense. People who aren’t True Believers don’t get it.

[QUOTE=Jackie Cochran;8056682]
Hi you all!

If I could be permitted to ask a Holstein question that everyone else probably knows the answer to.

Why was the Ethelbert sire line allowed to die out?

I am beginning to believe that this sire line contributed something that may have avoided the TB-Holst. F1 genetic incompatibility, something that may not have been passed to his daughters. Of course I could well be wrong, I don’t know much about the Holstein breed. But to me dropping the Ethelbert sire line sort of looks similar to what would happen if the Morgan breed dropped the Justin Morgan sire line. Yeah, the horses may be more “ideal”, but the Ethelbert sire line seemed to define the Holstein breed, just like Justin Morgan defined the Morgan breed, making it different from all others.[/QUOTE]

From doing pedigree work and looking at the pedigree of many, many horses, I can tell you that most horses have Ethelbert in their pedigree. He is one of the founding horses that heavily influenced Wb’s.
Are you speaking of a direct male tail?
In the days of hand breeding and limited numbers, it is not feasible to keep a certain ancestor in one position in a pedigree. If he had an outstanding direct sire line, they would have used it. But by 5 or 6 generations, that horse is more of a place holder than a legitimate influence. There are more important things to breeding than a y chrom.
But interesting is that most Wb male tail go back to Eclipse (some Herod). Eclipse is in Ethelberts’s pedigree in the male tail. Those horses are responsible for much of the Wb genetics. So his (Ethelbert) Y was the predominate version in Wb’s, just not passed on by his sons.

And what do you mean Tb-Holst F1 genetic incompatibility?
They are not incompatible, you are just adding genetics that are not as geared down to jumping as the pool you are adding them to.

Great post Tats! I don’t get it either.

[QUOTE=Sooty Tats;8056741]
I’m a rank outsider but I got to say: the thoroughbred obsession that traditionally flourishes among a small percentage of the COTH posters is really something else.

Unless you don’t accept that the premise of breeding for a specific discipline produces results (in which case, what are you doing here?) how in the world would it even be possible for thoroughbreds to compete with horses from European registries, which have been purpose bred for showjumping for generations? It would literally be some kind of miracle for that to happen. It would be statistically impossible. Why is this so hard to accept?

Saying the thoroughbred possesses superior crossover talent as a jumper at the highest level of the sport is like saying that a pro in the NBA would be likely to also excel in Major League Baseball. Enthusiasts on this forum puff the TB’s allegedly superior showjumping powers despite the fact they cannot adduce a single data point of evidence from recent years to support their position. Bayhawk is never going to be voted Most Congenial Forum Member because he reminds people of this inconvenient truth every time the subject comes up. Which is, like, a lot. I LOL every time another person reaches into the Wayback Machine and says GEM TWIST! when asked to provide evidence of the thoroughbred’s ability to excel in the world of contemporary showjumping. It’s kind of a punch line at this point.

Look at the clip JER posted on the eventing forum of the steeplechaser Vautour galloping and jumping. this is a magnificent example of a purpose-bred animal doing precisely what he is genetically predisposed to do. Note also that the athletic endeavor in which Vautour excels bears scant resemblance to contemporary showjumping. It speaks to the heart and athleticism of the TB horse that individuals do occasionally have the ability to compete at the highest levels of a discipline that bears little connection to the purpose for which they were bred. Isn’t this remarkable? Isn’t it enough?

The reason that people use words like “jihadists” is because the position flies in the face of common sense. People who aren’t True Believers don’t get it.[/QUOTE]

Not a single point of data?

You must not have been reading very carefully or know much about the subject. People have provided examples of TBs currently competing and being used for breeding.

Having ridden both warmbloods and TBs there is a need for more TB blood, especially among warmbloods in this country.

Nobody has said TBs are superior in jumping. People have said that there are TBs capable of jumping 1.6m courses and doing it very well. It’s possible to breed to TBs for jumpers because there are very talented TB jumpers and can be just as useful in sporthorse breeding as warmbloods.

I imagine answering your post was a waste of time though.

Meanwhile, as I’ve said before, it’s not as though top jumping and dressage horses are American bred even though those breeders are using warmbloods in their programs.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;8056466]
I’m not the one throwing around terms like hater and jihadist. Besides, I already know that you ride a TB. I have seen videos of Bayhawk’s horses and wasn’t exactly overwhelmed. They looked very nice but they didn’t look like world beaters. Of course, I realize world beaters are extremely rare.

One thing that is most definitely true about bayhawk is that he makes up things about other people in an attempt to bolster his own self image. He certainly has about me. That says nothing about me and a lot about him. If you want to support someone like that, fine. I wish that bayhawk would stop going on about TBs since he doesn’t seem to know that much about them.

I imagine that you are going to find a warmblood that can match your TB a little harder than you thought. Such horses aren’t that common among warmbloods either. Plus, the whole point of using TBs in sportshorse breeding is to breed them for something other than racing. For something, you know, like jumping, since there are TBs out there with that kind of talent, and have a lot of good qualities that many warmbloods lack.

Oh, and before you call me a warmblood hater, I bred a warmblood and will own him for all of his life (out of a TB mare by a Han. stallion). I still wish he had more of her blood traits though. I still don’t know if he inherited his dam’s incredible jump because I’ve never jumped him for various reasons.

Edited to add: I most definitely wish there were more breeders like Fred. Her stallion is an outstanding horse who had produced outstanding horses and she is a class act all the way. That’s kind of been my entire point all along, that I wish there were more breeders like Fred. [/QUOTE]

Oh PLEASE STOP!!! You’re giving me a headache.

[QUOTE=Sooty Tats;8056741]
I’m a rank outsider but I got to say: the thoroughbred obsession that traditionally flourishes among a small percentage of the COTH posters is really something else.

Unless you don’t accept that the premise of breeding for a specific discipline produces results (in which case, what are you doing here?) how in the world would it even be possible for thoroughbreds to compete with horses from European registries, which have been purpose bred for showjumping for generations? It would literally be some kind of miracle for that to happen. It would be statistically impossible. Why is this so hard to accept?

Saying the thoroughbred possesses superior crossover talent as a jumper at the highest level of the sport is like saying that a pro in the NBA would be likely to also excel in Major League Baseball. Enthusiasts on this forum puff the TB’s allegedly superior showjumping powers despite the fact they cannot adduce a single data point of evidence from recent years to support their position. Bayhawk is never going to be voted Most Congenial Forum Member because he reminds people of this inconvenient truth every time the subject comes up. Which is, like, a lot. I LOL every time another person reaches into the Wayback Machine and says GEM TWIST! when asked to provide evidence of the thoroughbred’s ability to excel in the world of contemporary showjumping. It’s kind of a punch line at this point.

Look at the clip JER posted on the eventing forum of the steeplechaser Vautour galloping and jumping. this is a magnificent example of a purpose-bred animal doing precisely what he is genetically predisposed to do. Note also that the athletic endeavor in which Vautour excels bears scant resemblance to contemporary showjumping. It speaks to the heart and athleticism of the TB horse that individuals do occasionally have the ability to compete at the highest levels of a discipline that bears little connection to the purpose for which they were bred. Isn’t this remarkable? Isn’t it enough?

The reason that people use words like “jihadists” is because the position flies in the face of common sense. People who aren’t True Believers don’t get it.[/QUOTE]

Great post ! Sincerely , Mr. Congenial…

[QUOTE=dressage fan;8056916]
Oh PLEASE STOP!!! You’re giving me a headache.[/QUOTE]

I don’t care if you have a headache. I have a right to respond. If you don’t like my posts then don’t read them.

You may have a “right” but that doesn’t make them very useful or interesting. Chill out a bit. Any you’re right, I don’t have to read your posts - so I won’t! I’m putting you on ignore.

Great. You could have done that without posting on the thread.

So, is anyone going to talk about the decision in Holstein ever again, like the stallions the breeders might use, for example.