One might wonder if a regimen of 15 pharmaceuticals might be a factor in an unusual and unprecedented lung disease in a young pony.
The story is that the injection was Legend. I know of no legitimate reason to give Legend two hours before a class. Maybe that’s what was in the syringe, but it doesn’t make me feel any better about the situation.
Adhock, I hope that folks like you are the direction things will start heading. I doubt it, but I can hope. You are exactly what this industry needs more of.
The USEF is unable to enforce the rules it currently imposes. Perhaps the focus would be better put on enforcing the rules that exist rather than imposing additional rules. That can’t be enforced.
[QUOTE=poltroon;6747264]
One might wonder if a regimen of 15 pharmaceuticals might be a factor in an unusual and unprecedented lung disease in a young pony.
The story is that the injection was Legend. I know of no legitimate reason to give Legend two hours before a class. Maybe that’s what was in the syringe, but it doesn’t make me feel any better about the situation.[/QUOTE]
Despite the novel that EM wrote to defend herself here, she never said what was in the injection that killed the pony. “I don’t drug my horses” she said. OK, so what was in the syringe?
My guess is that she has been warned that if she falsely claims the injection contained Legend or some other legitimate pharmaceutical, while also claiming she did not botch the injection process itself (“I thought I’d hit the carotid but I was wrong”), then the manufacturer of said pharmaceutical will come down on her head with a lawsuit that might finish her.
Of course I am just speculating here.
[QUOTE=gumshoe;6747278]
The USEF is unable to enforce the rules it currently imposes. Perhaps the focus would be better put on enforcing the rules that exist rather than imposing additional rules. That can’t be enforced.[/QUOTE]
Maintaining and even enforcing what exists which as you state is not working - is not going to work. Changing the entire paradigm and the people in control of it has a much better chance of success.
As already stated many of the abuses are NOT even able to be uncovered (dex/magenesium/over use of allowed drugs) under the existing rules
Perhaps part of the problem is that TOO MANY drugs are allowed within limits. Why the need for TWO NSAIDs? Why is DEX allowed? Having said what I did in a previous post, I’m all for adopting FEI drug rules.
From the USEF letter it makes it seem like GABA is the big problem at issue. I was under the impression that high doses of mag sulfate could have been the culprit and is untestable. Why isn’t USEF working on a test for that (or are they)?
USEF can’t give itself the power to subpoena but they need harsh penalties for noncooperation to close the admin loophole.
The usef turns a blind eye because it goes against the business. the USEF just dispenses suspensions here and there to keep people believing there is fairness in the system. But the truth is that those that spend a lot can get away with anything. And the trainers that have the big clients and support the USEF will find a way to continue showing and winning and getting awards for being model horsemen.
I know this has been said before, but it bears repeating for all the exhibitors and pony moms out there who are relying on their trainers to do right by their horses/ponies.
ANY substance given for the purpose of effecting a horse’s behavior is illegal.
This includes Depo, Magnesium, Dex, etc. etc.
Drugs which “don’t test” does not mean that they are legal. I have heard trainers tell clients that XXX is OK to give to Dobbin because it doesn’t test. WRONGO.
It is the purpose for giving a drug which makes it illegal, not the drug itself.
Yes, therre is a “drug list” of drugs which obviously make a horse quiet/lethargic. But that is not the total sum of illegal drugs.
Why would a gelding need a drug which keeps a mare from coming in heat? He doesn’t. He gets it because it makes him less cranky, less likely to pin his ears and wring his tail. He is given depo solely fo the purpose of altering his behavior.
Please, exhibitors, understand the distinction and question your trainer if you do not understand.
Do not become part of the problem, be part of the solution.
[QUOTE=fordtraktor;6747305]
From the USEF letter it makes it seem like GABA is the big problem at issue. I was under the impression that high doses of mag sulfate could have been the culprit and is untestable. Why isn’t USEF working on a test for that (or are they)?/QUOTE]
It was stated at the presentation at the USHJA convention that they are working to determine appropriate levels of magnesium - however, since it is a naturally occurring substance, it is taking longer than everyone wants. They don’t want to rush the tests in case someone challenges it later - they want it right the first time. That’s what they did with GABA (Carolina Gold).
[QUOTE=Lord Helpus;6747319]
I know this has been said before, but it bears repeating for all the exhibitors and pony moms out there who are relying on their trainers to do right by their horses/ponies.
ANY substance given for the purpose of effecting a horse’s behavior is illegal.
This includes Depo, Magnesium, Dex, etc. etc.
Drugs which “don’t test” does not mean that they are legal. I have heard trainers tell clients that XXX is OK to give to Dobbin because it doesn’t test. WRONGO.
It is the purpose for giving a drug which makes it illegal, not the drug itself.
Yes, therre is a “drug list” of drugs which obviously make a horse quiet/lethargic. But that is not the total sum of illegal drugs.
Why would a gelding need a drug which keeps a mare from coming in heat? He doesn’t. He gets it because it makes him less cranky, less likely to pin his ears and wring his tail. He is given depo solely fo the purpose of altering his behavior.
Please, exhibitors, understand the distinction and question your trainer if you do not understand.
Do not become part of the problem, be part of the solution.[/QUOTE]
Well Said!!! and about time!
It seems the poor Pony here had both known and unknown/undiagnosed medical issues M uses as a defense for all the “legal” drugs? Basically saying they knew he was sick and needed them all to keep going but was sicker then they thought?
That right there is the root of the problem. Overuse, keeping them going at all costs and “help” for the less then accomplished riders who support the trainer and pay for it all, including the “meds”.
Whole concept is wrong and has to stop.
And don’t wave the FEI flag around as a utopian answer, they got their own problems with “untestable” drugs du jour and enforcement at the highest levels of the sport. It’s not about more rules, its about enforcing the ones we have against ALL involved with the horse, not just the one who signs as trainer.
[QUOTE=poltroon;6747264]
The story is that the injection was Legend. I know of no legitimate reason to give Legend two hours before a class. Maybe that’s what was in the syringe, but it doesn’t make me feel any better about the situation.[/QUOTE]
Many people give Legend 2-4 hours out because they feel that’s when it is at its peak in the bloodstream. It’s not uncommon. Especially for a big show where the extra expense would be warrented.
The problem with using the phrase “altering the horse’s behavior” is that it’s often impossible to separate physical behavior from mental behavior. My horse gets ulcerguard and it changes his outward behavior - no more cranky ears and tail wringing. My horse gets regular Pentosan injections and his behavior changes from having sticky lead changes to clean ones. Both of those meds alter his behavior.
While I agree with the principle expressed in LH’s post, it is very difficult to adhere to the principle without crossing over into the gray area of legitimate therapies.
Of course, but thats not the real problem and not why some of this stuff is given as routine by some trainers. I don’t want to deny a competition horse access to legit therapeutic substances in controlled amounts for legit reasons either.
But that is not why they are given so openly and without question. Maybe they snow the owners about the “meds” charge on the bill with that BS but the comfort and well being of the horse/Pony is the last thing on their minds.
findeight, but how do you articulate in a rule that a horse may be given Robaxin for sore muscles but he may not be given Robaxin to make him quieter? I think that is the problem. So many legitimate meds have a sideline effect of making a horse “easier”.
[QUOTE=2bayboys;6747423]
findeight, but how do you articulate in a rule that a horse may be given Robaxin for sore muscles but he may not be given Robaxin to make him quieter? I think that is the problem. So many legitimate meds have a sideline effect of making a horse “easier”.[/QUOTE]
I may be in the minority in believing this, but in my opinion just because a medication has a legitimate therapeutic use does not necessarily mean horses should be competing on it. Why not change your horse management program to accommodate the particular horse’s needs? Should horses showing at the top levels of their sport really need to be shot up with dex, robaxin, and hormones in order to do their job? And conversely, if the horse is uncomfortable or its performance is impacted to the point that it needs these drugs, is it really fit and sound to be competing?
I have no idea…other then maybe if the horse is so sore all the time it needs a shot for every show? They need to back off with it? Maybe a shot every show is not the best thing to do with it?
Too many of these horses get alot of stuff and get it every time mixed with God knows what else and no thought of drug interaction. Not as needed for legit reasons. I would bet some of these “trainers” don’t even know what the stuff is really for.
It’s not all trainers, again. There are still ethical people concerned with the horse’s welfare out there that are capable of making informed decisions regarding legitimate uses for meds. But the rest of them are getting more and more numerous and the owners more and more ignorant of what is really being done at their expense.
Well said Sticky, thats what I was trying to get at but we posted at about the same time.
I agree with the above post. Perhaps if show horses are required to fill out a " reason for med form"… Then have it follow the horse for the entire show year. It would help with following trends…Why is Dobbin getting Dex for hives at every show? Then maybe something can be done…a show vet perhaps could be required to evaluate the horse to see if indeed it has hives.
[QUOTE=Horseymama;6745408]
Your response is exactly why it would work. Because if people have so much pressure and scrutiny from their peers to behave in an ethical manner lest all in a group be penalized, it is much more likely that they will then behave ethically.
It would make people choose much more carefully their trainers, barns, employees, and peers. It’s not about each person winning a nice ribbon. It’s about elevating the sport as a whole and promoting the utmost respect for our horses’ welfare.[/QUOTE]
No way in hell am I spending that kind of money to risk someone else in my barn blowing it. Too many people on this board alone have done their homework, and still been screwed. No matter how carefully I pick, there is always too much of a chance that someone in the barn miscalculates when to give bute. Punishments should be between the trainer and owner alone. NOT remotely OK to drag innocent people into someone else’s punishment. It’s like sentencing an entire family for a crime when one member of the family decided to steal jewelry. Our justice system doesn’t work that way, neither should the horse show circuit.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
