I have signed multiple non-competes throughout my career, and in my state they are, indeed, enforceable. Since I am an ethical employee, I have no issues signing them. Why, you might ask?
-
I would never dream of taking our customer lists and soliciting business from them. That list belongs to the company I work for and to their brand. This is no different to the horse industry.
-
I have signed NDAs as I should not be able to disclose sensitive information about my company. If you are a professional and ethical employee, you should have no issue with this. I would welcome a barn that was so organized they had these in place. I would not want someone posting images of my injured horse on FB or IG, for example, without my permission to show services like therapy, etc⦠when my horse is injured. I also do not want the price I paid for a horse to be public. The details should be private.
-
If I was given the opportunity to learn from a trainer, to assist them, to work under their brand, OF COURSE I would not dream of poaching their clients to start my own program. I have observed this here in my state several times, and what I have seen is the āvisiting trainerā or āassistant trainerā move in, start drama, takeover the customers, offer significantly reduced pricing initially to further attract the customer, and in one bizarre case even load up a trailer of customer horses and leave in the night. A professional and ethical individual would do no such thing. The horses were not at risk - it was pure control and drama over a starstruck client. A customer who follows such a character is also no loss IMO. But the financial loss to the trainer that took this individual in was quite huge. If I didnāt see it happen so many times I might think differently, but when I see a person refuse to sign I have to wonder what their intentions truly are. If you want to be so badly on your own in the area, why not hang out your own shingle in the first place? Because you need a baseā¦
-
Why is it such a big deal to negotiate a non-compete with reasonable terms? Why not a 20-30 mile radius for 1 year, for example, with an exception that it is void if the person is fired by said trainer? This is a standard situation in business - donāt we expect our trainers to also be professional and ethical? Maybe some customers will travel to the new trainer and some will not. But the whole point is to use your brand and talent to build your business, not to let your employer build a business that you then take. If you are so good and your customers love you so much, they will travel the 20-30 miles in the interim to go to you.
I would never judge a trainer for having a non-compete. I would think instead that perhaps this trainer actually understands business, and maybe even dare I say is a professional who expect the staff to behave ethically and professionally?