PIONEEROF THE NILE gone :o(

Heart attack, like colic, is a very broad term. IN both, there can be tears and ruptures, and more. It will be interesting to see what actually is the cause of this sad event.

Can you show statistics to back up your claim that breeding stallions in KY seem to have much more instances of heart attacks than other stallions?

Is it because TB stallions with a full book are more likely to suffer heart attack or it is because they make the news over the many other breeds and horses that have heart attacks that no one but their owner and vet are aware of?

2 Likes

As for heart attack, horses donā€™t have the same type of ā€˜heart attackā€™ that humans usually suffer.

I wish theyā€™d just call it a cardiac or circulatory event and be done with it.

I personally know of two sports horse stallions, not just reading it but heard straight from their involved people, who died of a ā€œheart attack.ā€ Much lower book, had used AI. One of them I had my mare booked to. No frozen, only fresh, so when he died, that was it. That farm cooperated with another breeder who was standing a son of their horseā€™s and offered this son to cover remaining mares booked to the first stud. I accepted on the ā€œeasiest option at this late pointā€ logic and got a nice colt. Still wonder at times what that never-performed first breeding would have produced for me, though.

Can you expand on that? Physiologically, wouldnā€™t a blocked cardiac artery be a blocked artery no matter whose heart it is?

They didnā€™t say much in the PR. This is just bad.

Dear Zayat Family, So sorry for your loss.

Are TB stallions (or TBs in general) are more likely to have cardiac events than other breeds?

Thatā€™d really be the first question. First hand I know of an inordinate amount of DLB progeny that died unexpectedly/suddenly of cardiac related events (when he himself lived to be 30, but has several sons that died before the age of 14 of ā€œheart attacksā€), and for being such a small-time horse person myself, have wondered if it was extraordinarily bad luck, or if it was something else.

I certainly canā€™t answer that question myself. Itā€™s tragic when it happens regardless of breed. And itā€™s not just TBs that collapse and die either.

Or because there are more TBs covering more mares in Ky the any other state?

I sold a QH gelding years back who dropped about a year later, probable cardiac event, about 14 IIRC. Not only never covered a mare, never set foot on a track but hardly overexerted himself at any time. Been around a good number of horses of assorted breeds over 50 years in boarding barnsthat dropped due to ā€œcardiac eventsā€, lifetime pleasure and light duty show horses mostly. IIRC they were all early to mid teens and do remember they were all male. Most geldings. Perhaps thatā€™s more the genetic risk then any specific use or bloodline?

Most horses donā€™t get necropsied and no large based statistical base exists.

1 Like

I think its safe to say that stallions with full books have a lot of wear and tear on their bodies from breeding so many mares. it takes a tremendous toll on their circulatory system among other things to cover many mares over a single season.

as I stated in my original post; heart attacks can happen to any horse at any time. But for stallions, breeding mares heightens that risk exponentially.

IIRC, horses donā€™t have the same type of fatty diet we do so their ā€œheart attacksā€ are not, IIRC, caused by blocked arteries.

Again, statistically or anecdotally from what you read in social media?

Yes, breeding is hard on the stallion. Many also deal with back and hock issues.

as noted in another postersā€™ post; no scientific data has ever been compiled on any of this and its effects on the breed. I see someone else noted the Seattle Slew family line. It doesnā€™t take long to compile your own info over time when reviewing stallion death announcements and autopsy results.

What cannot be denied is the incredible toll that the act of breeding takes on a stallion and multiply that by the amount of mares they breed per year; including the mares they have to service more than once. I do not think it is a coincidence when these stallions die in their teens or even early 20ā€™s of ā€œinfirmities of old ageā€.

I donā€™t believe Nile was ever shuttled to another country but look at these stallions covering massive books of mares domestically and then moving to another hemisphere to cover massive books there. They all will be completely shot by the time they hit 20 if they make it that far.

While not approving AI may keep some genetic variability within the breed; I think its thatā€™s a cop-out. AI would open up the avenue for breeders to use a wide array of stallions across the globe, regardless of travel time and location. I imagine many mare owners try and keep their mating choices to a reasonable distance unless its a top mare. Shipping mares all over the place is a massive risk in itself. but A.I. would take away a considerable amount of bodily stress that these stallions go through facing massive books of live cover.

2 Likes

I would simply suggest that ā€œdeath announcementsā€ and publicly released autopsy results would still fall into the category of anecdotal information and not any, at least for me, meaningful cause and effect study.

Just me.

Question: Why couldnā€™t AI be a strictly monitored procedure: stallion collection over-seen by the vet as much as a live cover is. A very limited number of pipettes available: = live cover.
A LIMITED amount of collected semen could be frozen and shipped to other countries. Again, the same number of mares that would be covered, would be the same via AI. A vet oversees all of it. No more than 2 pipettes per mare, and ONLY if the first insemination didnā€™t take. Other pipettes are destroyed.
There is DNA typing and micro-chipping. I feel this ā€˜couldā€™ work. Maybe not.
Opinions?

1 Like

When hell freezes over perhaps the Jockey Club will allow A.I. :slight_smile:

On a different subject, am I the only one who immediately thinks ā€œartificial inseminationā€ when A.I. is mentioned instead of ā€œartificial intelligenceā€ which is what the general public is usually referring to?

4 Likes

The AQHA was sued when it tried to limit the number of foals a mare could produce in a year (via embryo transfer). They lost the lawsuit, had to change their rules, and pay a financial settlement to the breeders.

AI opens the door to a similar problem in Thoroughbreds. Any restrictions set by the JC would probably be very quickly contested in court where the JC would be likely to lose.

6 Likes

You can still limit a horseā€™s book if you are doing AI. Can you expand on your ensuring diversity statement? If you limit a horse to 50 live cover mares, versus 50 AI coversā€¦what is the difference?

1 Like

You conveniently overlook the fact that advances in theriontology have decreased the number of covers required to get ONE mare in foal. Twenty years ago a stallionā€™s book might have been only 60 mares, but that stallion might have to jump many/most of those mares 2-3-4 times before the mare was confirmed in foal. Now, thanks to more accurate methods used to predict ovulation, itā€™s more likely to be ā€œone and doneā€.

5 Likes

Big_Tag, did you read this post?

Yes, but I donā€™t quite get how that even transpired. It makes sense to me that youā€™d limit a mare to 1 foal a year bc thatā€™s all they can actually produce on their own. Standardbred stallion breeding is almost entirely AI (at least at the commercial level) and itā€™s not some limitless free for all; a stallions ā€œbookā€ is closed after a certain number of mares. No one is getting sued over this practice so Iā€™m not sure why it couldnā€™t work in TBs.
To be clear, I have no idea if AI is better or worse than live cover for a stallion; Iā€™m just addressing AI feasibility.

2 Likes

Standardbred people are perhaps less litigious than TB people because you guys have let that restriction stand. It probably wouldnā€™t happen in the TB industry where everything is a numbers game and the only thing stallion owners really want is more, more, more. At any rate, the JC doesnā€™t want to have to defend a lawsuit that they would probably lose based on precedent.

2 Likes