So we are riding topless and pantsless now? That really would be relaxing the rules! Sorry, couldnât resist!
I hope this goes through. It would reduce the stress factor when one has to be her own groom, and maybe it would encourage availability of breeches in more medium colors. It seems right now most are either very light or very dark.
What? Are you saying that the dressage saddle and position for dressage makes riders look fat so people need to wear a specific brand required by the USDF so everyone looks the same?
Iâm still not following how dressage makes people look fatter than, say, hunters. Your leg should be against the saddle in all of them.
My interpretation is that the spirit of the proposed changes was intended to make it more inviting & affordable for riders of other disciplines to dabble in dressage by enabling them to come as they are, so to speak. Iâm going to make the assumption that most of these riders arenât going to pay to join the USDF & instead will start out with schooling shows. At least locally, where the hunter tradition is 100+ years strong & still dominates the area equestrian culture, the dressage community bends over backwards to make things open & inviting at the schooling level. It is very common to see riders at a dressage schooling show here in black or navy breeches & a short sleeved show shirt with integrated collar or a polo in a color other than white. Gloves do not have to be white. Helmets are simply supposed to be âconservative coloredâ, but I canât imagine any of the dressage judges locally dinging a rider for wearing a bright colored/patterned schooling helmet (or for much of anything, really) when that rider had clearly made the effort to be neatly turned out.
At a local schooling hunters, 99 out of 100 riders will be in buff-colored TS or RJ Classics breeches, black coat, and black boots/helmet. Occasionally, some bold rider of a chestnut will wear a dark green or navy coat, or UK transplant rust or canary-colored breeches/jodhpurs & coat with a subtle pattern. That it is it. It is noticed if your coat has 4 buttons (dressage coat) instead of the requisite 3. Field hunters are similarly conservative & traditionally dressed. If any of these riders come as they are to a dressage test, theyâre going to be more conservatively attired than is actually called for. Theyâd have to go out & buy dark-colored breeches & show shirts if that is what they wanted. Most eventers & show jumpers already own a couple pairs of white breeches. Theyâll wear them. They are not going to bother going out & buying anything different.
Personally, I have no issue with a rule change to allow dark-colored breeches at USDF shows. I just donât see a substantive difference in the dirt/flattery factor between white/light-colored breeches & the official buff breeches of hunter land that no one seems to take issue with. Personally, Iâve had better luck with white breeches because theyâre typically heavier fabric than the buff. Itâs expected that white breeches will get dirty. I once saw a show jumper walking around Upperville with their entire back, shirt & pants, stained with good old VA clay. Look close at pictures of riders like Charlotte Dujardin & Carl Hester post-ride. The inseam of their breeches is stained black from the saddle & arena dust is clearly visible. The only pristine white breeches Iâve seen are on a Pikeur model.
Why are spur required at high levels? Shouldnât it be left to the rider to decide? On another note, why force the double bridle as well? Again shouldnât it be left to the rider to decide what is best?
Regarding spurs, I believe they are only ârequiredâ at the FEI show level (thatâs the CDIs, not a âregularâ USEF/USDF show), and âdummyâ spurs are permitted (they have no shank) SInce the spur is a refinement of the leg aid, I suppose it is expected that upper level riders have a refined leg.
Regarding DOubles, they are now optional all the way up to GP at National shows. Here is a good resource for USDF/USEF shows: https://www.usef.org/forms-pubs/sAH3nOVD85c/dressage-attire-equipment-booklet
If you donât understand how unflattering white breeches are when compared, to say, dark grey, me thinks you arenât a dressage rider OR you are a lovely size 4 or lower. Which, good for you, but seriously, even buff colored breeches are more forgiving than stark white.
Color (and fabric weight) MATTER when putting together a âpictureâ and darker colors are a hellâa lot more forgiving than flat white, It doesnât really flatter anyone but brides and even then, a nice ivory is normally the better choice.
That wasnât the question, though @AltersAreUs. It was why dressage, specifically, would make one look fatter because your âthigh is flat against the saddleâ.
Eta: As far as I can determine, buff & cream breeches are allowed through 4th level under the current dress code. Probably even light grey. Hopefully, someone who knows for sure can verify.
White breeches are a personal or peer pressure choice, even at the FEI levels. Lots of lovely alternative turnoutsâbrown shadbellies/helmets/boots and cream breeches/accessories, for instance, out there.
My very old-school trainer flinches somewhat at my buff or pale grey breeches, but she gets over itâŠ
Just wanted to report back that the SmartPak Soft Shell coat I linked earlier in the thread was a little too bright. I did however get a Horseware jacket (https://www.smartpakequine.com/pt/horseware-competition-jacket-11008) in Hunter Green to try and after ordering the right size kept that one.
Ha! That I know I wonât be as Iâve shown in the past in a wool hunter green jacket with 3 buttons that was too big on me! The funny thing is when I got my first ârealâ dressage coat and wore it at Regionals the in gate asked where my green coat was.
I did like the material on the SmartPak coat better and Iâm not sure how the smaller size would have fit. But the Horseware coat in the smaller size fit perfectly except for sleeve length. For a backup coat, AND most importantly a green, you canât beat the price.
This is excellent news for you guys in the US. British Dressage specifies white, cream, or beige. I can live in hope, right?
Now if they got rid of stock ties, I would be dancing in the streets. Who thought wearing a piece of strangling white fabric around your neck, generally on roasting summer days, was a good idea? Other sportspeople wear stuff which improves performance, safety, or even if itâs just for looks, it at least doesnât impede those things, but we get stock ties, which are uncomfortable and horrible and a pain in the arse. I donât think they look good on anyone.
I used the velcro ones and it could never be loose enough. But I really hate stuff around my neck. Iâm from in the US originally and showed there, but it was the late 90s/early 2000s, and my hazy memory is that they were required.
Reading BD rules suggests they are required on this side of the pond. But at the moment, thatâs a future problem.