[QUOTE=wanderlust;8640389]
It’s interesting, she’s not the biggest or fanciest moving horse, but he shows her off to every advantage. The medium is clearly different from the working, the transitions between everything are crisp, the geometry is incredibly accurate. He rides her a bit up and open, probably because she’s a touch short in the neck and not as uphill, and you can see he is always trying to move her to that place where she’s just slightly ahead of the vertical so she can use her back end and lighten her front end. The whole relationship really pretty special. It’s a masterclass every time he enters the ring.[/QUOTE]
I had some of the same thoughts - it is the rider that is the difference, not so much the horse. Saw some fancier movers that didn’t have the same quality test. Definitely Jung has a nice, athletic, scopey horse under him. But so do a great many of the riders at Rolex KY this year. In fact, all of them in the respect that they have a horse capable of qualifying for Rolex. It is HOW he rides that makes a huge difference.
Today I especially noticed that Jung’s transitions were very definite. There was a clear demarcation between movements, and those points were precisely located. Few of the other rides were as sharp, yet fluid, in the change from one movement to the next one.
Jung’s mare was also straight and true in her travel. None of the tilts and wobbles that were waving left & right in the vertical space above the feet of a number of the other horses. Rocana didn’t have the fanciest gait, but it was one of the most consistent.
I thought the ride was a great example for any rider, on any horse, at any level. Want to significantly better your score? Maybe you don’t have to get a new horse, just ride more like Michael Jung on the one you have. (Generic ‘you’.) It may not produce a Rolex-quality test, but, on any horse, it may well be better than 95% of the competition at whatever level. 