[QUOTE=candico;8677274]
Since these violations occurred over a few years, that means ownership was okay with it. Someone concerned with animal welfare would have tightened up the ship so to speak after the first one or two violations. And to agree to pay a 3.5 million dollar fine and shutting down that portion of their business vs fighting the accusations in court speaks volumes about knowing they have no valid excuse for the infractions and probably put profit over prioritizing animal welfare. I just wonder how much went on that inspectors never saw.
Owning a bunch of show horses does not mean someone cares about animal welfare at all.[/QUOTE]
could be true, but you are assuming a lot of things about what everything means. We really don’t know for sure what really happened.