My biggest issue with this is the emotional narration behind the account (“Save Larry!!” in the title of the GFM does not really make me respond warmly, when it’s clear the horse isn’t in need of ‘saving’ rather, her ride on him is in question).
That said, I think this is one of the situations where I’m less opposed to seeing a GFM. She clearly had an agreement that was working with her original sponsor. Unfortunately, she passed on. In that emotional (and no doubt, also concerning time for the rider - wondering about if she would be able to secure her ride on the horse or not?) time she jumped at what seemed to be a solution. Clearly, as indicated now, it wasn’t.
The why isn’t something I’m sure on - was the new sponsor expecting things that were unreasonable? Did the rider over-promise? Did they just misunderstand each other? Who knows. It doesn’t seem like the public has been made privy to those details.
That said, the rider arranged for loans on her own time to immediately address the issue. Technically she’s not looking for funds to buy the horse, but pay back those loans. Again, it sounds like she might have leapt at an immediate (short term) solution when the problem arose.
Hopefully she’ll learn from this event and going forward, will work on creating a set of contracts and hash those business decisions out more securely. There’s a bunch of lessons to learn.
But from all accounts (and I don’t know her personally but know of people who have worked with her) she’s a hard-working, solid rider (and personally I’m inclined to think well of her given her willingness to work things through with a horse that to all accounts can be a challenging ride in dressage) who puts in the effort and the hours.
((Not directly related to this situation, but it’s annoying to me as a rider when we have independently wealthy professionals or professionals who are well heeled with great sponsors, who have one horse after the other who are absolutely lovely but the rider themselves is unsupportable - Marilyn Little is a great example of this. And then on the flip side, we have riders that seem to be precariously positioned in terms of sponsors and finances, even if their horsemanship and riding is good. I don’t advocate GFM as a solution to this disparity, for what it’s worth, but I can’t blame someone in Sara’s situation for trying.))