[QUOTE=findeight;8271377]
Yes, I said it was on a curve, because that’s the best way to try to explain they are ranked in comparison to others in that class that day.[/QUOTE]
I tend to explain it that hunters are judged by ordinal numbers (first, second, third), by direct comparison between the horses. Dressage is judged by cardinal numbers (one, two three), and comparison to a standard for each movement.
For instance-
The hunter judge likes the round of the bay number 123, so gives it a score of 90.
The hunter judge likes the round of the gray number 456, but not as much, so gives it an 80.
The hunter judge thinks that the round of another bay, 789, is better than 456, but not as nice as 123, so gives it a score of 85.
In order to do this, the hunter judge has to hold onto the score sheet for the entire class.
The hunter judge USES the numerical score to document and keep track of the ORDER in which he/she prefers the horses.
The hunter judge ALWAYS knows which horse got the highest score
The dressage judge, on the other hand, assignes a score to each movement (and the collective marks), and then gives the score sheet to the runner. The judge does not know what total score any individual horse got until he/she checks the results after the class is over.
It is quite common for the dressage judge to check the posted results during her break IN ORDER TO FIND OUT WHO WON the class he/she just judged.
I personally, would not call the hunter judging “on a curve”, but it is definitely based on RANKING the rounds in comparison to each other, rather than assigning a score without consideration of what other scores have been assigned.