Sick Kitty and ER Vet issues (long and kind of rant-ish)

[QUOTE=threedogpack;5649813]
this is still at the E clinic?

if so, then I would want to stablize and do minimal treatment, in order to take dog to my own vet in the morning.

if not, and this IS my vet, we are going to either take payments or euth.[/QUOTE]

Because a DKA this sick with this many other problems has one of 2 treatment options: All the way, meaning 24 hr care, repeated blood work monitoring, etc, or euthanasia. There is no “half way”, etc treatment.

If the pet was a “healthy” DKA pet, then stablization over night/weekend and onto vet in the morning is a perfectly acceptable and viable option.
In this area of still rural but sort of urban OK howerver, I would find very few of the regular veterinarians wanting to take this patient on in the morning. THEY would recommend leaving it with me/us for treatment. Or euthanasia.

And minimal treatment for this patient is agressive IV fluids, insulin therapy, blood values rechecked every couple of hours, etc. Just to get the dog STABLE. Not fixed.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;5650296]
What about cats? They seem much more sensitive to the effects of general anesthesia than dogs. Is it more dangerous for them or do they just take longer to clear it from their system?[/QUOTE]

Nope.
Some drugs they clear quicker.
Some drugs will accumulate with continuous administration.
Most are the same in any 4 legged (and 2 legged) critter.

The percieved senstiivity is that they are smaller and things change faster so if you aren’t on top of stuff you can get caught with your pants down, so to speak.

And if you are talking injectable drugs only for anesthesia, that is dose dependant more than anything (ok, other things to but I can’t teach an entire 3 yr anesthesia residency here!!)

[QUOTE=prairiewind2;5650790]
No, we don’t know what he died of. No one does necropsies here, and vet just said, “old dog.” As I also mentioned, we were younger and stupider then, and had more faith in vets.

We did not take him in for pain or stronger meds. He was doing fine. We were in for a checkup. The vet said they had a newer, better painkiller, and so “let’s get him off aspirin.” Not our idea. So I took in a dog who was doing very well for his age, gave him a new med, and he died. Is there a chance that something unrelated to the Rimadyl caused his death. Sure, I suppose so. Most all things are possible. But am I suspicious because a pretty healthy old guy went in, was given a new med with no tests or aspirin layoff, and died with a couple of days after becoming anorexic? You bet.

I was under the impression that Rimadyl (carprofen) inhibited Cox 2.

As far as Addison’s and glucocorticoids - you are describing primary Addison’s. That is not what my dog had. Checked my records last night, and he had what my vet generally called secondary Addison’s, though that may not be the scientific name. (Remember, no specialists here.) I looked in the Merck Manual to see if I could find what she was talking about and found with this page.

http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/sec12/ch153/ch153c.html

Prolonged steroid use can bring it about, whether or not the steroid is stopped abruptly. There are other possible causes, and the dog/person probably has underlying issues. But do I still doubt the vet that put my puppy on months of steroids? Yes, because the next vet we took him to did allergy tests, and had allergy shots made that took care of the dog’s allergies with no steroids. Obviously the steroids were the easy way out, and may have contributed to my beloved dog’s illness and death. Perhaps I would have been more understanding if that same vet clinic hadn’t given my old dog Rimadyl with no tests, and nearly declawed my kitten (and I absolutely DO NOT believe in declawing cats!).

As far as anesthesia goes - I am probably misspeaking. It is not the protocols that I have trouble with, it is anesthesia in general and surgery. I’ve had three sighthound breeds, one of them rare in this country. That one has a problem with malignant hyperthermia. I don’t know that the anesthesia protocol has anything to do with that, just anesthesia in general. I agree that protocols for sighthounds are much safer now than they used to be, in general anyway.

Factor VII can be tested for, and has proven to be of questionable predictive value in my rare breed. Some dogs with it don’t bleed, and some dogs without it do. No one knows why.

I can’t speak of DIC in all sighthounds, just in my three breeds (of which I have only one now, the rarest). And DIC is a problem in this rare breed. But because the breed is rare, there won’t be lots of testing and studies. Sighthound studies are usually done on greyhounds, because there are a reasonable number of those and lots of money in racing them. (At least there used to be.) DIC is a mystery and a terror to us owners, though less so to me because in my breed anyway, it most often happens in females and I only have males.

Liz[/QUOTE]

Yes, rimdadyl inhibits COX2. That is the reason we use it. However it, and ALL the NSIADS, inhibit COX1 too. To some degree or another. That is the effect we DON’T want and is responsible for the side effects.

Addisons: There is primary, which is the dog’s adrenal, all by itself for no identifiable reason, stops working. There is secondary, or iatrogenic, addisons, which is due to us putting to much of the steroids into the dog causing the normal negative feedback mechanism to cause the adrenal to “take it easy”. It is still working but has backed way down. So when the long term, high doses of steroids are suddenly removed, there is no adrenal function. This is (usually) temporary, but still needs to be treated until the adrenal resumes it normal function.
With primary, there are 2 “types”: typical and atypical. It seems, at least in my world, that most are atypical. Ie they don’t come in with dramatically elevated K and dramatically low Na, bradycardic, in shock, etc. Most present with vague, waxing and waning, non-specific signs. Perhaps your dog was an atypical addisonian?
With secondary addisons, as long as the dog is on steroids, he is fine. If anything, they become iatrogenically CUSHINGOID due to the excess steroids.
And speaking of Cushings, when treating a dog with “real” Cushings, one of the risks we are taking is perhaps making the dog addisonian.

MH: it is a genetic disease and not caused by anesthesia. It is TRIGGERED by some anesthetics, which are seldom if ever used any more in veterinary anesthesia. However there is a syndrome that looks alot like MH, but isn’t. And is brought on by drugs we often use for sedation. It is not a sighthound specific problem though. If the dog lived thru the “MH” episode, it wasn’t MH. And again, you can test for MH.

Factor 7: Bleeding, or not, is a funciton of the amount of factor present. Many von Wilibrands dogs wont’ bleed, until something upsets their apple cart. Some bleed if you look at them wrong. The former have low amoungs of the factor involved but “enough”. The later have virtually none of the factor involved. Not an all or nothing.
If you think (or know) your dog has a facto 7 problem, then advse the vet to either do an IN HOUSE PT clotting test to see if he has enough to clot at that time, or just go ahead and administer fresh frozen plasma to replace the factor if the dog needs surgery.

DIC is a mystery and terror to ALL of us. Once we know what is triggering that particular patient to develope it, we might be able to treat it and it will no longer stand for Death Is Coming or Dead In Cage. :frowning: If you have any PROOF you have or know of some breed that is predisposed to developing it, I want to see it. I am not being a smart as here. I really do want to see it. And you PM me the info.

Liz:
Sighthounds don’t require any more special anesthesia than any other breed.
What is required is that each PATIENT needs to have its own anesthetic protocol. No matter the breed.

PM me with your breed. You have me curious now.

[QUOTE=threedogpack;5650038]
Dear Squish the Bunny. Why are you so intense about this? I’m not one of the thinkallvetsareouttogetme crowd.

I feel singled out because I played to your scenerio. I’m not a vet, I never said I was a vet and I listen to what my vet (and if was at an ER that vet) says and make as informed a decision as I can. I was playing YOUR game here. But I won’t again.

You have a nice day.[/QUOTE]

Not trying to single you out at all :slight_smile: Just wanted to make a point that patients that appear to be only “kinda” sick, can be incredibly ill and if the owners want them to survive, $$$ will need to be spent. It was just a scenerio, one of many, that happened this weekend at work. Clients were really unwaware that their pet was this ill.

I shouldnt have said “YOU” so literally, what I meant was in general, as a pet owner - its hard to understand that the ER vets arent trying to steal your money and keep your dog in hospital for no reason…the good ones are seriously trying to save lives and have far more capabilities at doing so than your regular clinic. Like comparing your family doctor to a trauma surgeon.

I appologise for singling you out, really didnt mean for it to come off that way - just wanted to persue the point that some people were not getting.

[QUOTE=MeghanDACVA;5650982]
Nope.
Some drugs they clear quicker.
Some drugs will accumulate with continuous administration.
Most are the same in any 4 legged (and 2 legged) critter.

The percieved senstiivity is that they are smaller and things change faster so if you aren’t on top of stuff you can get caught with your pants down, so to speak.

And if you are talking injectable drugs only for anesthesia, that is dose dependant more than anything (ok, other things to but I can’t teach an entire 3 yr anesthesia residency here!!)[/QUOTE]

I was wondering about this because twice in the last 20 years I’ve had an experience with cats taking DAYS to get over the effect of general with regard to coordination, etc. I always figured they got too much for their weight.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;5652045]
I was wondering about this because twice in the last 20 years I’ve had an experience with cats taking DAYS to get over the effect of general with regard to coordination, etc. I always figured they got too much for their weight.[/QUOTE]

I bet they got IM drugs only. And high doses. I wish I could tell you this doesn’t happen often but it does. And as an anesthesilogist, it drives me nuts!! :wink:

I haven’t read all of the posts, but count me in as another person who has a problem with the ER vets. I’m sure with others who have complained, we know there are good vets out there… just not by us!

Had a “free” cat who got hit by a car. It was winter, so when we found him an hour or so later he hadn’t bled that much (too cold!), but most of the damage was to his head. He didn’t look good. We brought him to the vet–and they wanted 1600 dollars just to look at him. No tests, wouldn’t even take him back into the room to glance at him–and there was a VERY good chance they could have taken one look and seen he wasn’t worth trying to save. When my parents balked at that number, they wanted nothing to do with them. ‘Well, if you want to save your cat you’ll do it.’ Excuse me?

My parents got them down to 1000 and they took the cat back, just to come back out and say he probably wouldn’t make it through the night. (after the receptionist picked up the phone and called the vet in the back: “We got it! We got the money.”) …gee, thanks. We told them we’d give the cat until 8 in the morning–if he was stable we’d take him home, but we made it clear he wasn’t going to be staying with them for 1600 a day.

4 in the morning he was ‘looking better, even got up and moved around’. Awesome! We were making plans to bring him home (bunch of medical/doctor people in my immediate family so we were going to set up IVs and whatever else he needed until our normal vet could come out). And then at 7:55am, we got the phone call that he didn’t make it, and that would be 1600 dollars, please.

I’m sorry, and I may sound crazy for saying this, but I’m pretty sure they euthed my cat so that ‘we wouldn’t have to make the decision’. Five minutes before the time we’d given him he suddenly didn’t make it, with no explanation? They may have thought they were doing us a favor but it wasn’t their decision to make.

They were terrible to deal with, insanely expensive, and made us feel like terrible owners for not being able to fork over 1600 for a barn cat. [On pricing: I realize some of the things he would have needed were expensive, BUT the price to look at him at all was outrageous.] I never get too attached to cats, but he was one of THE coolest animals I ever had the privilege to meet, and he deserved so much more then what he got. (It’s been over three years and I’m tearing up! Miss you coop!)

I will NEVER go back there–I will put my own animal out of its misery then return there if I can not get a hold of my vet. To all those vets/techs on this thread who seem so kind and reasonable… please come my way!

ETA: I forgot–my mother wanted to bring the cat home to be buried, and when she got there they handed her a trash bag and said ‘here.’ whilst my mother BAWLED. I know you’re no counselors but some sympathy, please!!

I have a really really hard time believing they wanted over a grand “to just look at the cat”, no tests, no nothing.

THere are definitely part of the rest of the story that are missing here.

Anyone with half a brain knows this is just ain’t so.