I’m definitely not part of any such movement, and I would resent anyone who lumped me in with them. But I’ve bought and sold enough horses, and been around enough middling lesson barns, that I recognize when aged horses that have outlived their utility are offered up for sale. Real “schoolmasters” represent decades of training. They are seldom sold and are often leased or lent, and then gracefully retired.
These horses might offer something to low level riders, maybe for a couple years, but how fair is it to pawn off end of life care on these likely green/unsuspecting new owners or risk a trip to the auction when they rapidly accumulate maintenance costs? It is hard to see how WW, at this age and with her injury history, can remain riding sound for long without treatment.
All I ask is that people are honest, and had the ad not mentioned Jane, or insisted upon “forever home”, or used other phrases like “through no fault of her own” and “herd reduction”, phrases which tell you NOTHING about the horse’s qualities and are designed to tug heartstrings and abdicate responsibility for getting rid of an unwanted horse, I wouldn’t have commented.