[QUOTE=ayrabz;7767057]
I’m not going to pretend I read all of these pages. I started to, I tried.
What I am going to comment on is the original intent of the title.
Really? You want to diminish something someone else has to say in their heart about a horse relationship?
Why? Why would this be important to you to downplay and try to tear down?
I don’t get it.
You may not feel this way. You may be a horse trader, or someone who has many cross your path. You may be a trainer who wants your students to purchase another and yet another…you may therefore have reasons to encourage something beyond this. But, why? are you adamant about striking out at someone (many of us) who will never walk away from a certain horse…who will always hurt for the loss of that horse…
what was your point?
You’re not a horseman in my book if you cannot acknowledge that these connections do exist.
You’re a hollow horseman that I would not want advising me in anyway on my journey. I can always buy another horse. I will always listen to someone I admire. But I won’t admire anyone who says there is no reason to recognize a ‘heart horse’[/QUOTE]
:eek:
Ok, I shall translate for the rest of us heartless wenches:
“You are a big mean poopy head for not recognizing that what Dobbins and I have is spechul!!1!!1!!eleven!!!”
I admire professionals who know their stuff, not their fluff or perception of butterflies and rainbows!
And your post is likely the prime reason ‘Heart Horse’ makes a bunch of us cringe.
Fluff does not make a horse professional. I admire people a lot more who treat their horses - all horses - with the greatest of care.
And yes, it’s been common knowledge in my family for generations: The horses get treated better than people, and yet…they are horses.