[QUOTE=Fairfax;6721595]
I have never argued they don’t cause joint pain.
I was pointing out that my ex did not suffer from any effects of high heels.
I do not know if her legs and feet adapted OR they were formed in such a manner that it caused her no problems. She is over 60 and has worn them since she was 15
I expect the same can be stated about SOME TWH’s. That is why I have no reason to doubt Cordial. She (?) has owned them for a long time AND would have had noticed any soring over that period of time. There is no reason for anyone to question her honesty.
I still wonder why there have not been any PUBLISHED studies by vets and under the direction of a university? That is where they study the horse against others and do follow them documenting problems OR dispelling urban legends.[/QUOTE]
High heels pay for the houses, cars, and boats of a lot of podiatrists and orthopedists. They also probably buy a fair number of college degrees for their children. My mother wore heels most of her life as a teacher; she had some foot deformation in her later years. In China they used to use an analog of the stack/band to bind girls feet and keep them small for aesthetic reasons. There’s plenty of evidence that things are capable of serious deformation of living tissue.
And, remember, a woman takes off her high heels for at least 8 hours a day. 
You know, as well as I do, that university level studies on this sort of thing will be very expensive. They will of necessity be multi-year and will include a significant number of horses. Who’s gonna fund it? The TWHBEA? Yeah, when pigs fly on that one. Who else? The USDA? I don’t read the HPA as authorizing research on soring, just enforcement of the law. An independent group? Any research from this type of study will immediately be challenged by one side or the other (depending on who’s ox is being gored).
I would not have much respect for any alleged equine professional that could not tell the difference between a therapeutic pad and a “cosmetic” pad. While there might, in a very few cases be some overlap, applying the “first, do no harm” standard could separate the sheep from the goats pretty quickly, here.
As to Cordials allegations, “where’s the beef???”
Again, the assertion that the cosmetic pad system used in the creation of the Big Lick has NO impact on the health of the horse is one that is made by either a blind man, a committed zealot, or paid shill.
G.