[QUOTE=hurleycane;6799589]
:rolleyes:Lordy.
OK as Preacher would say - lets break it down.
For one - I read that Guilherme having been DQP trained at one time (BTW when was that? ) is conveying that there are a bunch of sored flat shod horses that are getting away with it cause people are focusing on stacked and chained horses. Am I understanding you?
The DQP training was 1998. I’m telling you that flat and light shod horses are sored up at least as much as the padded horses. Right now everybody is fixated on the padded horses; the others are getting caught but probably at a lower rate.
But tell me this - all shown horses in TWH SSH and Racking land are subjected to DQP, right?
If that’s what the HPA says.
Are you implying that soring is going on on every Racking, TWH, and SSH horse - even if passing DQP???
Not every drunk driver gets caught; not every sored horse gets ticketed.
DO you realize what you are implying? Do you think there is no gaited horse of these breeds that is an honest high stepping smooth moving son of a gun???
Please read for comprehension. I’ve said that soring among the light/flat shod horses is common. Neither more nor less. I imply nothing; I only make a statement.
That is how it reads. Kinda reminiscent of your previous mantra that HPA is for all horses.
You’re reading what you want to read; read the HPA, too. But READ it.
So question - Do Mangalara Marchadors have to go through DQP? Are they all sored?
I’ve been advised by show managers that if we have a Machador Only class then no DQP inspection is required. If we enter an open gaited class then DQP inspection is required. I’ve never seen a sored up MM and I’ve seen almost 75% of all the horses in the U.S. At the shows I attended in Brazil soring is a non-issue because the judging standards do not overly reward a particular way of going.
I bring it up cause you seem to give no credit to the TWH SSH Racking horses natural abilities at all - specially when you imply there is rampant soring in flat shod land. Tell that to the folks at NWHA.
I’m not in the “credit giving” business. I doubt i need to instruct the NWHA on their business, either.
Katarine - You indicated first hand knowledge of a sored horse. Was he exhibiting this behavior at home or at the show? Did he flinch at the DQP? Stumble with the DQP?? Did he in any way fail the test other that act sullied up as you said? My guess is by he sucked you mean he did not pick up his front feet? Was he actually sored at the time of the show?
I just gotta repeat that these recurrent statements of “they sore flat shod horses” are wearing thin. Of course they might - and it is why there is a DQP. So pulease understand it is NO and I mean NO SURPRISE or ‘blow up a kilt’ that the potential to sore any horse - even a barefoot horse is there. Heck they road sore the paso finos! And the mountain horses!!! It is a plague of the gaited show industry!
But to infer that advocates are only focused on the stacked horse is way crazy. They check em all! So this constant inference of oversight is tiresome, and contra to the effort to remove action devices which are indeed used to enhance soring for the sored horse. NO DOUBT ABOUT that.
Again - a simple soring use of the light chain action device = A horse limps when it is sore. When it no longer is sore, it no longer limps. Same for the founder crawl of the sored horse.
So if a horse is not sore at the time of the show, the soring will have no benefit. UNLESS a horse is “sored” and conditioned to raise a foot really high r/t the pain of the chain. Then he may do the foot raise with just the chain.
And then we have the stewarding - I know - so the horse will not flinch to palpation.
But please tell us all how a “sored” horse can be “sore” and not DQP test as sore? And what sored horse is bright eyed and bushy tailed? I am telling you they well be sullied up as Kataine described for sure if sore at the time of the show.
So break it down. Parse out your rationale for me please how this atrocity of a bunch of sored flat shod horses is getting in the show ring time and time again cause folks are focused on stacked horses? Which by the way we are not - action devices are more than just the stacked horse.[/QUOTE]
You can train a horse to jump through a hoop of fire. The Army trained them to run straight at cannon and people shooting at them. Baucher taught them to canter backwards. Do you think it’s a big trick to teach them not to react to a specific type of pain?
Not all DQPs are created equal. Even the most honest and consciencious can miss a sign twords the end of day then then it’s hot and they’ve conducted several hundred inspections.
There’s also an element of judgement in doing an inspection. If you palpate once and get a reaction most will try again to “confirm” that you got a real reaction and not just a random movment. Remember that if somebody challenges a ticket you’ll have to swear under oath about what you saw. That’s a substantial burden. So if you get a reaction, retry and don’t get one, then what do you do? Being thorough, you try a third time and get no reaction. You observe no stewarding. You see no other evidence of pain on palpation. The horse passes. Maybe it was sore and maybe it wasn’t. But if you don’t have evidence of sorenesss then the horse passes.
DQPs and VMOs are humans. The good, honest ones will tell you that they always do the best they can but the initiative rests with the Bad Guys. If they come up with a way to “beat the system” then the system will take some time to catch up. That’s just the way it is in law enforcement at any level.
G.