Tennessee Walking Horse Soring Issue *Update post 1*

A leading Tennessee Walking Horse industry group sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Monday, contending that the government’s effort to impose minimum penalties for soring and abusing horses is unconstitutional.

Earlier this month, the USDA announced it would put in place a rule requiring organizations that inspect horses to assess minimum penalties to violators of the Horse Protection Act, the 1970 law that makes it illegal to show or transport a sored horse.

SHOW Inc., the Shelbyville-based horse industry organization, filed the lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas in Fort Worth, claiming that the new rules violate the constitutional right of trainers and owners to due process under the law.

The lawsuit seeks to prevent the USDA from putting the rule into effect July 9. Two other plaintiffs — Contender Farms and Mike McGartland, a Tarrant County, Texas, resident and owner and general partner with Contender Farms — joined in the lawsuit.

In a statement, SHOW said the new rules punish organizations that are working to change the Tennessee Walking Horse industry.

“Reformers within the walking show horse industry are committed to self-regulation as demonstrated by recent efforts, but the USDA’s regulations are not only unconstitutional, they unfairly punish those most aggressively working to clean up the industry,” SHOW President Stephen Mullins said in a statement.

Keith Dane, equine protection director for the Humane Society of the United States, slammed SHOW for filing the lawsuit.

“SHOW’s decision to file a lawsuit trying to block USDA’s efforts at reform says everything about whether this industry has the will or ability to clean up its act on its own,” he said by email.

USDA spokesman David Sacks said Monday that the department’s Office of General Counsel has received the lawsuit but declined to comment because it remains pending.

‘Private tribunals’
Soring is the practice of using chemicals and other methods, including putting foreign objects in the horses’ hooves, to produce a higher gait. Dripping harsh chemicals on the horses’ front feet forces them, because of pain, to lift their legs higher. The walk is prized in walking horse competitions.

In announcing the new rules this month, the USDA said it will now require horses found in violation of the Horse Protection Act to be dismissed from the show. If a horse is sored, the new rule also will require those responsible for the soring to be suspended from participating in shows, exhibitions, sales or auctions. The length of the suspension would vary, depending on the number of prior violations.

The federal government has only enough funding to send its own inspectors to a small fraction of the more than 450 horse shows held across the nation each year. Instead, it relies on a form of industry self-regulation, with approved horse industry organizations conducting inspections.

USDA officials said that in the past some organizations have declined to issue penalties stiff enough to deter soring. With the new rule, the USDA said, competitors will know that inspections and enforcement will take place consistently at all shows.

SHOW, in its lawsuit, argues that the USDA can’t use the industry organizations to enforce federal laws without giving individuals proper due process.

The new rule does not give accused trainers or owners the right to appeal, according to the complaint. Using the organizations as “private tribunals” violates the Constitution by unlawfully giving judicial powers to private entities, the lawsuit contends.

SHOW and other industry groups have long cited a 98 percent compliance rate with the Horse Protection Act. But a recent analysis by The Tennessean showed a significant difference between the number of violations issued by the industry when USDA officials are present and when not.

When the USDA was present, horse industry inspectors found seven times as many violations of the Horse Protection Act.

SHOW cites efforts
SHOW officials say they should not be lumped in with other industry organizations. The group has said it is tougher than other horse industry organizations and points to efforts it has under way to cut down on horse soring.

For instance, a new swabbing program began June 15. The program uses sophisticated technology to test for chemicals and masking agents, such as drugs that numb pain, that might help disguise whether a horse is sored.

In a separate statement to The Tennessean, SHOW said what is important is not how people perceive the lawsuit but making sure horses are protected. SHOW said it supports consistent enforcement of federal law.

“It is not an issue of uniform penalties, as we would like the entire industry to adopt the strict rules SHOW has. The issue is forcing the industry to prosecute bad actors as if it was a court system, something that would hinder our ability to focus on real reform,” SHOW said in its statement.

The Walking Horse industry has struggled with soring for decades. It came back into the spotlight last month after an undercover video released by the Humane Society of the United States showed nationally known trainer Jackie McConnell soring and abusing horses at his Collierville farm. McConnell was indicted for his actions and pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to violate the Horse Protection Act.

Contact Duane W. Gang at 615-726-5982 or dgang@tennessean.com. Follow

[QUOTE=GaitedGloryRider;6397237]
Not entirely implausible.

My horse was sored before I got him. I’ve had him fifteen years and even still he will cower, run away, scramble at the stall wall, try to escape in the right/wrong circumstances. Sometimes he reacts to men with loud voices, someone walking past his stall with a lunge whip, getting too close to him with a board or something similar (think trying to do a repair in a stall next to him or replace a board in his pasture too close to him).

When he goes into that panic mode all you’ve got to do is get hold of his halter and put him in the cross-ties, and you’ll see him mentally check-out; he freezes up, stands stock still and trembles a bit. One could describe as instantly going from a sheer panic to “stoic”.

When that fear response is triggered it’s nothing like when he gives off a little spook on the trail or getting a little belligerent over something he doesn’t want to do. It’s hard to describe but to someone that knows him it’s easy to see the difference between his “that scares me, or I don’t want to do that” and his “Oh dear God PLEASE don’t take me back to that part of my life” reactions.

I can totally understand where that woman is coming from as she describes her horse, my horse is the same way. And it does make handling the horse tricky, makes them unpredictable.[/QUOTE]

When they check out like that they won’t move. And they won’t hardly guly let you pick up their feet…but then out of the cross ties they can panic and move…the cross ties are often a trigger.

As for some of the articles errors…welll
…the horse owner did not write it. Blame the author for those

[QUOTE=walknsound;6397313]
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20120626/NEWS01/306260016/Tennessee-Walking-Horse-group-sues-USDA-over-fines?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|News[/QUOTE]

Huh. So SHOW is suing the government because they don’t want to be told they cannot allow illegal activities within their organization. Nice.

Love 'em or hate 'em, Kieth Dane summed it up pretty well with the quote “SHOW’s decision to file a lawsuit trying to block USDA’s efforts at reform says everything about whether this industry has the will or ability to clean up its act on its own”.

[QUOTE=katarine;6397337]
When they check out like that they won’t move. And they won’t hardly guly let you pick up their feet…but then out of the cross ties they can panic and move…the cross ties are often a trigger.

As for some of the articles errors…welll
…the horse owner did not write it. Blame the author for those[/QUOTE]

My horse never moves in the cross-ties (or in hand) when he’s in that state. Even if he’s freaking out, if you manage to get hold of him or tie him that’s what he’ll do, every time. Thankfully nowadays his episodes are few and far between but it still happens on the odd occasion. Just locks up, eyes roll back and he starts trembling. If you unhook him and try to lead him away he’ll go, but you’ve gotta be very careful how you handle him or he’ll just blow and do everything he can to get away.

Can’t speak for all horses but I can speak for mine, and that’s what he does. And I from what I know of my horse I can kinda visualize what hers does. Maybe I’m off-base, maybe hers behaves similar to mine. I dunno.

Yep…my Chip does not blow up but he does have to have time to come back to earth.

I just wonder how many times the Fed has been sued successfully for anything. I always heard, “Sue the Federal Guvmint-----good Luck!” Hope this is tossed out as a frivilous lawsuit. Appears to me to be a delaying tactic.

[QUOTE=hurleycane;6395661]
Do you feel free to speak for or against the stacks and chains that the TWH are subjected to? I do not recall ever having read anything other than worries about whether any such ban will affect other breeds from you.

Me? I am completely against stacks (and you know that does not mean pads) and chains. What the devices in this extreme produce is horrid and looks the same as a sored horse.

What say you?[/QUOTE]

I am against soring Period. If chemicals and chains are the cause then that is against the law. I do not believe the TWH needs chains in the show ring. I do not believe the semi tiered stacks should be allowed. There is, as you pointed out, a great difference between pads and stacks.

My comment is about the article. The inconsistencies are what those, who support BL and non interference will pick up on. Also, with not knowledge of horses however have the ability to see inconsistencies will be lost to your cause.

Too many are now crying wolf and claiming their horse was abused. That is the same as every Mom filing for divorce claims the father of sexual abuse. People are becoming cynical and believing less and less of what they read.

Used to think my one horse was being very polite when he stood stock still for me during hoof cleaning as my other gelding bit him on the flanks. Now I shudder to think of what may have triggered his politeness.


ETA I am not saying he is abused, but often my farrier, vet or trainer will say they feel he has been abused. He is polite, very responsive and attentive and will leave you in a New York minute if you carry a crop, pitch fork, tool, etc. He only learned to make eye contact when we taught him to “touch” our hand for a treat. He is in many ways a total joy and very dangerous if misunderstood.

Fairfax - I did have the impression you were not in any way in favor of continuing stacks and chains - I just was not sure that you had ever clearly stated it. Thanks for responding.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6395743]
Read for comprehension Fairfax/Leo. She approached him once loose in a stall. Im sure she would have gotten an entirely different reaction had the horse been in hand or in cross ties. But maybe not, maybe he was one of those horses that fought stewarding. Whats your point Fairfax ? Does that make his scarred pasterns disappear ? Stoic, or cowering in terror - whats the difference ? Both would be logical behaviour of an abused horse.

Day said she once triggered Big 'Un’s memories by approaching with a measuring stick.

“I’m not brandishing it at him, just walking,” she said. “I’m about a 5-5, average-size woman. I go in with this stick, this animal shrank into a corner of his stall and cowered. He was terrified.”[/QUOTE]

She claims that he was abused and therefore is skittish. To the non TWHBL authority…most people reading know horses are already skittish and “high strung”.

My point is: Trainers are accused of beating the horses (caught on tape) so they will fear a beating rather than an examination. It would appear, and it has been claimed by those in the know on this forum, that a horse will endure horrible pain when the examiners touch them and will not move one muscle. Posters have claimed that when they cross tied the horse OR held it by a lead rope, that it had obviously been abused as it would not ever move.

This woman claims her horse not only moves but is terrified AND she makes the claim however where it the show record for a back up?

The overall point is: Those in favor of BL will find every inconsistency and point it out to the media. They will also use the tactic that their charity shows raise money for the poor old vetrans. One poster has already stated they won’t ever give to those vetrans as they should have known who they were getting funds from. Pieces like that are fodder AGAINST your movement.

For those of you who hate the BL, I would recommend going to Youtube and disliking at least the Celebration videos. I have had a lot of bantering with the person putting these videos on Youtube. This person is very argumentative and quick to justify the TWH industry and BL. I keep pointing out the number of “dislikes” compared to “likes” to help illustrate how the public views the BL.
Some of you can help too? Thanks!

My story has not changed in the five years i have owned Chip. He did not
make the cut to go be shown. I apologize that he does not fit your rigid, albeit random, protocol for who can own a horse…even what is a horse… that was mishandled/abused in a WH barn.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6395357]
Yep, Cotten although not necessarily a good guy got hammered by Mullins of SHOW for the wrong reasons. Also interesting that it may have been SHOW inspectors, not actually the USDA that caused the problems at the show in Alabama. DQPs operate under the USDA so i’m still unclear whether SHOW DQPs or USDA inspectors were performing the inspections.
http://www.chattanoogan.com/2012/6/25/228988/Roy-Exum-Cruelty-On-Facebook.aspx

Roy Exum: Cruelty On Facebook
Monday, June 25, 2012 - by Roy Exum

Roy Exum Joe Cotten, a Tennessee Walking Horse trainer from Bell Buckle, Tn., was suspended by the SHOW Horse Industry Organization for 7 ½ years and fined $5,000 over the weekend for all the wrong reasons. After he posted pictures of a badly-maimed horse that had been brutalized by another trainer on Facebook, he was promised by incensed SHOW officials that they would “drop the hammer” and his immediate suspension is the longest in the organization’s history. The Facebook pictures, which graphically show dramatic and prolonged damage to a horse named Joe’s Wine and Roses, were quickly taken down but not before copies were hurriedly sent to advocates who are against the longtime practice of soring and abusing the magnificent animals.

(I received copies on Tuesday with an explanation why Cotten would not accept the horse in such bad condition.)

Undaunted, SHOW President Dr. Stephen L. Mullins announced on Friday that Cotten would be suspended until Dec. 21, 2019. “This is one of the longest suspensions ever issued to a Tennessee Walking Horse trainer, even longer than what is required by the federal government. We take these violations seriously and we are relieved to put the very troubling incident behind us.”

Cotton’s penalty is not from soring but – in theory – because he knowingly filed false entry information while on suspension from one violation and probation for another. But industry insiders say that’s not the truth, but that by exposing the graphic pictures Cotton cast further cause for alarm in a tainted performance horse industry that is now reeling from animal abuse, alleged corruption, and literally hundreds of violations of the federal Horse Protection act.

The SHOW press release goes as far as to blatantly point out that Cotton’s violations are the same that caused the notorious Jackie McConnell and three of his employees to enter guilty pleas in a Chattanooga Federal Court and said Cotton sent a vulgar text message to SHOW president Dr. Stephen L. Mullins.

What actually happened was that Cotton sent Mullin pictures of the horses and demanded to know how the mare had passed SHOW inspections in such terrible condition. Equine experts agree the damage to Joe’s Wine and Roses did not occur in Cotton’s stables.

There was further pandemonium over the weekend when SHOW inspectors, stressing a swab test, caused a huge uproar that effectively shut down the Georgia Walking Horse Summer Classic Show in Buckhead Saturday. It seems SHOW discourages licensed trainers from participating in shows that do not endorse and include the new initiative. SHOW, of course, is part of FAST, which provides money for horse shows.

Last week the Tennessee Veterinarian Association joined a consortium that is eager to eliminate action devices to achieve “the Big Step” at Walking Horses shows and a growing outcry from the public sector is beginning to gain momentum into the cruel and illicit quest for the blue ribbons.

While horse followers acknowledge Cotten violated probation at the Liberty Lions Club Show, there is huge sentiment he is being “hammered” for the Facebook pictures and for speaking out in an industry where the last 10 “Trainers of the Year” all have past violations of the Horse Protection Act.

State charges will he heard this week in Fayette Co. against Jackie McConnell, who has already pleaded guilty to federal charges in Chattanooga and will be sentenced on Sept 10. Animal cruelty will become a felony in Tennessee in July.

royexum@aol.com[/QUOTE]

Thanks for posting the entire article. Ugh.
Excellent reporting by Roy Exum. Big Yuck needs to go down. And all those people with TWH who cower from sticks and zone out in cross ties… how sad. Believe me, my Thoroughbreds don’t zone out in cross ties and anything that causes an Ouch reaction Gets a reaction. At the same time, I can approach all of them without any fear reaction no matter what I’m holding… …unless it is the lead rope attached to an alpaca.

here is something to ponder.

why did SHOW Inc. not stay in Tn to file suit.who is SHOW Inc. other than Mullins.

Why did they need McGartland,in Texas.

this suit could back fire on them.

if K.D. steps up with $$ and means to cover all the twh shows,the other HIO would be out of a job so to speak,bet they did not think of that.

Mullins has opened a big can of worms.

Done

[QUOTE=clbailey54;6397616]
For those of you who hate the BL, I would recommend going to Youtube and disliking at least the Celebration videos. I have had a lot of bantering with the person putting these videos on Youtube. This person is very argumentative and quick to justify the TWH industry and BL. I keep pointing out the number of “dislikes” compared to “likes” to help illustrate how the public views the BL.
Some of you can help too? Thanks![/QUOTE]

I disliked some of them, more later. Seeing those BL horses made me cry, about all I can take right now. :mad:

[QUOTE=Fairfax;6397560]

My point is: Trainers are accused of beating the horses (caught on tape) so they will fear a beating rather than an examination. It would appear, and it has been claimed by those in the know on this forum, that a horse will endure horrible pain when the examiners touch them and will not move one muscle. Posters have claimed that when they cross tied the horse OR held it by a lead rope, that it had obviously been abused as it would not ever move.

The overall point is: Those in favor of BL will find every inconsistency and point it out to the media. They will also use the tactic that their charity shows raise money for the poor old vetrans. One poster has already stated they won’t ever give to those vetrans as they should have known who they were getting funds from. Pieces like that are fodder AGAINST your movement.[/QUOTE]

I can’t speak for everyone else but I know for a fact my horse was abused. Wasn’t too hard to figure out what the guy was doing when he told me to leave the barn while he taught the horse a lesson because I wouldn’t want to watch. What was he being punished for? He fidgeted when the guy tried to handle his feet. And I did hear the blows landing so even though I didn’t see it firsthand I feel pretty comfortable saying it happened. I bought him that day and he arrived at my barn in stacks, pressure shod and with some nasty raw spots on his pasterns. Got him pretty cheap because he “wasn’t doing well in training” and the guy was “fed up with him” (his words). He even had the nerve to ask me for the stacks back if I was going to have them pulled.

And before you go all apey on me for not speaking up right there, I was a young naive woman alone in a barn with a rather gruff man who. So yes, I kept my mouth shut because I didn’t feel like it was a very safe situation. And yes, I reported what I saw to my local AC. He was the first horse I bought, that man was my first experience with a Big Lick person and it was a real eye-opener. AC did nothing that I know of but I do know the guy isn’t in horses anymore, he’s serving a rather lengthy prison term for domestic violence and cocaine possession.

Furthermore I’m not putting my story out there for media to dissect. But my horse’s abuse is not an assumption on my part, I know for a fact what was done to him.

June 26 Morningline interview with Marty Irby and Keith Dane

http://www.newschannel5.com/category/107462/morningline

And Roy Exum

http://www.chattanoogan.com/2012/6/27/229135/Roy-Exum-Another-Nail-In-The-Hoof.aspx

Roy Exum: Another Nail In The Hoof
Wednesday, June 27, 2012 - by Roy Exum

Roy Exum The Tennessee Walking Horse industry, already in dire straits as blatant and persistent examples of animal cruelty, criminal misconduct and increased bickering between its organizations are quickly coming to light, drove what is being described as a “coffin nail” into an already badly-sored hoof Monday when its leading group – of all things – sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The complaint, filed in Texas, alleges the government’s efforts to impose minimum penalties for soring animals and other horrific abuse is unconstitutional and anybody who has ever watched a Matt Dillon movie knows the last thing you want to do is mess with the “Marshal,” especially when the nation’s public perception is now rampant that the Tennessee Walking Horse industry is as crooked as a mare’s back leg.

The suit, to no one’s surprise, comes from the Shelbyville-based organization called SHOW, which has been rife with past and present violators of the federal Horse Protection Act since the law was enacted in 1970 but, not until earlier this year, have federal prosecutors sought and earned guilty pleas. One plea came from the now-infamous Jackie McConnell, a Collierville trainer who in an unrelated incident was filmed viciously beating a horse with an electric cattle prod and cruelly harming other horses.

The tape, distributed by the Humane Society of the United States, was initially shown on the ABC News show “Nightline” but spread like wildfire, igniting the furor of the 500,000 owners of Tennessee Walkers in the United States and abroad. It triggered other compelling news reports, such as the last 10 “Trainers of the Year” all have violations of the Horse Protection Act and, of the top 20 trainers in the so-called Rider’s Cup competition, they have a collective 161 violations in just the last two years alone.

Curiously, SHOW officials said very little publicly, other than to ceremoniously take McConnell’s picture off the Hall of Fame wall, and, with desperation beginning to mount, formed a new group called Tennessee Walking Show Horse Organization on May 25. Less than two weeks later, the now-alarmed USDA published final rules for greater horse protection but, by June 15, TWSHO announced a controversial “swabbing test” that still has the various groups in the floundering industry mystified.

For example: Last weekend complete pandemonium occurred at the Summer Classic Horse Show in Buckhead, Ga., when a committee member was informed TWSHO inspectors would be present. Believe it or not, the Buckhead show officials had never heard of TWSHO, nor invited them. Allow me to share part of the email that is also spreading across the Internet to millions of titillated horse activists:


“Yesterday someone from TWSHO called and said they were coming to swab horses at our show. They did not ask me – they told me – they were coming. I told them that we did not want them to come to our show to swab and gave some very logical reasons which I will list below. I was told that we had no choice in the matter, and I was also told that I could not show my horse if it was not swabbed. Please tell me how TWSHO has any authority whatsoever to tell me that I can’t show my horse if it is not swabbed.

“I don’t remember voting to give this organization any authority over me as an owner. I have not been made aware that you are an “official” organization representing the TWH industry, and have not received any correspondence from you to explain who you are and what the “swabbing initiative” is.

“So, I went to your website to find out more about TWSHO. There is certainly not much information there! There is no address or phone numbers. Where are you located? There is no indication of what type of legal entity you are. I have no idea who your officers and Board of Directors are. Do you even exist?

“The one thing I DID find on your website was a letter that contained the following (and I copied and pasted this directly from your website): The swabbing initiative will start June 15th with SHOW events and any Show Manager that requests or agrees to have it at their event. Since I have seen nothing else in writing from TWSHO, I have to trust that this statement is still true. Therefore, we do not request nor agree for you to conduct swabbing at the GWHEA Summer Classic Show.

“The reason for our hesitation about this is that many of us have a lot of unanswered questions about TWSHO and this “swabbing initiative.” Is there anything in writing that has been sent to the industry stakeholders like myself explaining who TWSHO is – such as your purpose, what you think you can accomplish with it, why you think it would benefit me to join with your initiatives, and how you think this will benefit the industry?

“I got a call out of nowhere from a woman on the phone that I don’t know representing some organization that I don’t know anything about, assuring me this is being done to help the industry – but she couldn’t answer any questions I have about it, nor do her assurances protect me from potential legal ramifications that might result from this.”


The well-written email goes on and on but the “big lick” came Monday when SHOW sued the USDA in an unbelievable reaction. Keith Dane, the equine protection director for the Humane Society, said “SHOW’s decision to file a lawsuit trying to block USDA’s efforts at reform says everything about whether this industry has the will or the ability to clean up its act on its own.”
Ironically, one of just two names listed on the TWSHO website is Kathy Zies, who threatened to have Dane appear at a closed hearing last week to see if he should remain on the Breeders and Exhibitors Board after making the scathing McConnell tape available to Nightline which, she claimed, harmed the walking horse industry.

Apparently the hearing was cancelled after Zies later said she was betrayed. “I am withdrawing my complaint due to the fact that even though all the protocols in the past have deemed that a complaint be kept confidential, this one was put out to the national press and public by TWHBEA’s President Marty Irby.”

Obviously those who have become glued to this story don’t have long to wait until the next episode. In a late-afternoon email from the Humane Society’s Keith Dane, he writes, “SHOW’s decision to file a lawsuit trying to block USDA’s efforts at reform says everything about whether this industry is willing or able clean up its act on its own. It shows that this industry wants to continue with absolutely no oversight, and without even the most minimum of standards to provide a deterrent.”

Finally, an uproar has emerged over the sudden 7 ½ year suspension on trainer Joe Cotton, who posted gruesome pictures on Facebook of a badly-injured horse named Joe’s Wine and Roses after the horse was brought to his barn by another trainer. Cotton, who allegedly got no hearing before “the longest suspension in Walking Horse history,” is believed by many bloggers to be an industry scapegoat and legal ramifications are said to be underway.

royexum@aol.com

This does just get crazier and crazier. You couldn’t make this $hit up.

Fascinating what people will do to protect their “right” to abuse.

All sarcasm aside - Roy may not be a horseman but he sure puts it in a perspective like no one else!

In fact this is no longer just about the horse is it?

Thanks again WITW!

Roy Exum for Emperor!

I cant find out the outcome of Jackie McConnell’s day in court yesterday. Has anyone heard ?