They could be ‘frightening’ but are mostly frustrated attention-seekers. I know someone who posted a civil comment over on BCH and was verbally attacked followed by nuisance emails to their personal account with the usual name-calling insults on the verge of threatening.
BCH previously encouraged a gang-frenzy mentality of insult-bombing the Martins over social media after the Taylor Made acquisition and appeared to gloat to each other afterwards to share their cathartic ranting. The Martins took down that website shortly after. They punctuate their entries with language you certainly would not utter in church. Do they really think this is effective for them in a ‘good’ way??? The bizarre irony is that their fans who post the most negative things to the Martins then turned up on his site and others acting like angels to glean Chrome information (since they can only rely on the ridiculous speculations by the administrator for their latest Chrome news). Where does she even dream up her ideas???
The latest eye-rolling statement she has posted is: ‘this page (BCH) exists because of the continual lies, twisted facts, and half-truths coming from the other side since the whole thing started.’ Could there be anyone more in utter denial?